Why Did Christ Wait So Long to Come Into the World When Men Had Been in the World For 200,000 Years? A Catholic Article About This

  • Thread starter Thread starter mdgspencer
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I don’t. But any astrophysicist and astronomer would have a resounding “Yes!”
 
Fr. Georges Lemaitre was also an evolutionist. There’s a lot of problems with evolution.
 
That’s not what the Church Fathers believed.

There are also problems with the Big Bang. Nobody wants to challenge them though.

Here’s a starting point: Big Bang Fizzles
 
There are wayyyy more problems with young earth creationism lol
 
A rudimentary understanding of the geological record. Pangea
 
That’s because other sub-species and cousin species of Homo have since died off. Our genetic diversity is limited because we spent most of our history, as a species, as a relatively small group in Africa. It’s only in the last 50 000 years or so that we’ve started to spread out across the globe.
 
The Big Bang model was first formulated by a Catholic priest / astronomer, Monsignor Lemaitre, in the early 20th century.
 
Recent popes, going back to Pius XII, have not seen any conflict between Catholicism and modern science.
Why do you insist on promoting evangelical pseudo-science?
 
What are your credentials for challenging every respectable biologist, geologist, chemist, and physicist in the world?
 
I will have to disagree with the evolutionists. the first part of genesis is easy to figure out, doesnt take a rocket scientist to figure it out.
 
Last edited:
That’s because other sub-species and cousin species of Homo have since died off. Our genetic diversity is limited because we spent most of our history, as a species, as a relatively small group in Africa. It’s only in the last 50 000 years or so that we’ve started to spread out across the globe.
That still doesn’t explain why we’re the dominant ones out of the bunch…and they’re dead. Let alone explain why we’re the dominant ones out of everything afaik.

And even Chimps living relatively close to each other (a mere river apart) in Africa still have more genetic diversity.

The authors also contrasted the levels of genetic differentiation between the chimpanzees from the different groups with those based on similar data from humans from different populations. Surprisingly, even though all the chimpanzee populations lived in relatively close proximity (with the habitats of two groups separated only by a river), chimpanzees from different populations were substantially more different genetically than humans living on different continents.
Professor Peter Donnelly, Director of the Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics in Oxford and a senior author on the study, said: "Relatively small numbers of humans left Africa 50 000-100 000 years ago. All non-African populations descended from them and are reasonably similar genetically.
“That chimpanzees from habitats in the same country, separated only by a river, are more distinct than humans from different continents is really interesting. It speaks to the great genetic similarities between human populations, and to much more stability, and less interbreeding, over hundreds of thousands of years, in the chimpanzee groups.”
And that’s just chimps. The same could be said for apes.


Even corn 😛

http://maize.teacherfriendlyguide.o...sity-and-evolution/genetic-diversity-of-maize
 
Last edited:
Not EVERY scientist.

I’m being scientific and looking st objections to common scientific beliefs. Isn’t that what scientists do?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top