T
The_Barbarian
Guest
Actually, it was your disparaging use of the word “barbaric”, I was objecting to.
I caught that and that’s why I added that you were excluded but I was using it in reply to someone elses’ usage anyway.Actually, it was your disparaging use of the word “barbaric”, I was objecting to.
Nyuk Nyuk.Actually, it was your disparaging use of the word “barbaric”, I was objecting to.
The fact that no spiritual being can ever change.Well, what prevents this god from having been evolved same as us?
I didn’t say that this god changed. I asked if it could be evolved. As the Barbarian noted, individuals do not change, populations do.The fact that no spiritual being can ever change.
See, no parts. No parts means no change.
And in order to maintain the universe, He’d have to be a spirit, not a part of said universe.
No, there’s only one Supreme Being (hence the name), therefore there is no population that could evolve–and the single-only supreme being can’t change.I didn’t say that this god changed. I asked if it could be evolved. As the Barbarian noted, individuals do not change, populations do.
So a god, even a spirit god could certainly be the product of the same kind of evolutionary process. If you are axiomatic about this being impossible, perhaps you simply have a negative opinion of evolution. But I’m not aware of any teaching that states this god cannot have been evolved. But that’s all another subject anyway.
And not to put too fine a point on it, but spirits, individual spirits, must certainly be capable of change. For there must be some fundamental difference between a soul in a heaven and a soul in a hell, or else they would not become segregated after departing from their point of origin, which is this god.