Why did Jesus need to be baptized?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bieby
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
B

bieby

Guest
My wife Lorina recently brought something to my attention while we were reading the Holy Bible together. Obviously the Blessed Virgin Mary was conceived without the stain of original sin, and Jesus is the Son of God. From his mother, He couldn’t have inherited original sin, so does that mean he inherited original sin from His Father (God)? This really doesn’t make sense - Lorina pointed out John the Baptist baptized Jesus and the voice from Heaven called Him the beloved Son. Does this mean that Jesus was not literally a “beloved Son” until then? Is it sinful to wonder about this, I hope not.
Any of you guys have any idea?

Ora pro nobis, Mater Dei!
http://www.google.ca/imgres?imgurl=...ge=4&ndsp=24&ved=1t:429,r:6,s:75&tx=39&ty=108
 
As you rightly pointed out, Jesus did not need baptism for the forgiveness of sins as He does not sin. Neither did He commit the crime necessary to “require” crucifixion.

He was baptized in order to set the example of what we are to do, which is to be baptized.

In being baptized, Jesus once again showed His humility by taking on the trappings of sinful humanity along with the rest of us.,
 
As you rightly pointed out, Jesus did not need baptism for the forgiveness of sins as He does not sin. Neither did He commit the crime necessary to “require” crucifixion.

He was baptized in order to set the example of what we are to do, which is to be baptized.

In being baptized, Jesus once again showed His humility by taking on the trappings of sinful humanity along with the rest of us.,
Thanks!
 
It’s important to keep in mind that Jesus wasn’t undergoing a Christian baptism (how could he?! ) ; He submitted to the baptism performed by John as a sign of His entry into His public life (and, as the Fathers teach, His entry into the water sanctified it as the sign of Christian baptism).

The baptism performed by John is that it is “a unique baptism in the desert in view of the repentance and pardon (Mk 1:4p). . .The baptism of John set up only a provisional economy: it is a baptism of water which is preparatory to the Messianic baptism in the Holy Spirit and fire,” Xavier Leon-Dufour, Dictionary of Biblical Theology. It was an external ritual signifying an effort of conversion of the baptized (much as many Protestant denominations look upon baptism today).

The baptism of John was the “mikveh”, a ritualistic bath which was a common “rite” in Jewish worship. However, in the case of the baptism of John, he was applying the mikveh in a particular sense: a sense of conversion TO Judaism. When one becomes a Jew (even today, in Orthodox Judaism), one has his head shaved and his fingernails and toenails closely cut - as if one is a baby again; and one is immersed into the mikveh (the ritualistic bath) so as to emerge and be “reborn” as a Jew. This is exactly what John was doing as the precursor to the Messiah.

For 2000 years God has asked the people of Israel to keep faith with His Commandments - and for 2000 years the Israelites had failed to do this. Yet, now St. John comes along preaching a baptism of repentance to prepare for the Messiah. Here, what St. John is saying is: "Okay, everybody! Come on back! Become REAL Jews and truly commit yourself to the Jewish Covenant to which you have been unfaithful. THIS is what is meant by the “baptism of John” - a baptism into Judaism, into the Jewish Covenant - in preparation for the Messiah’s coming.

However, Jesus’ Baptism (the Baptism He instructs His Apostles to perform in the Name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit) will do something greater. It will be the Baptism into a NEW Covenant - a Baptism into His Church. The Greek work for “Church” (Ekklesia) means “those who are called out” - that is, out of Judaism, out of the old Covenant of law and into the New Covenant of love. Thus the Church will be that remnant of Israel which, along with the Gentiles, will accept Jesus as their Messiah and King. John’s baptism was not enough to accomplish this. While John’s baptism made one fit to be a Jew (one faithful to the Covenant), it did not make one “born again” into the new Covenant in Christ - just as Christ tells Nicodemus in John 3. So a new baptism was necessary.

John’s baptism, therefore, was NOT for the removal of Original Sin and being born into the New Covenant; rather it was a preparation for the pouring out of the Holy Spirit through the Death and Resurrection of Our Savior. It is the Christian baptism by water and the Spirit into His Death and Resurrection that accomplishes in the soul (1 Cor. 1:13; Romans 6:3 & 9) what it signifies - a rebirth into Christ, the Sinless One, who signs us with His Cross and the power of His Resurrection. It is the new and greater “circumcision” that now joins together Jew and Gentile, male and female, adult and babe into the Familial Covenant of Christ.
 
“John’s baptism, therefore, was NOT for the removal of Original Sin and being born into the New Covenant; rather it was a preparation for the pouring out of the Holy Spirit through the Death and Resurrection of Our Savior.” - FCEGM

Spot on.

Pope Benedict XVI in his book Jesus of Nazareth, explains:

*"…Descending into the water, those baptized recognized their own sins and sought to free themselves from the weight of being oppressed by sin. What did Jesus do? Luke, who throughout his gospel pays particular attention to the prayer of Jesus, and constantly presents Him as the One who prays - in dialogue with the Father - tells us that Jesus was at prayer after being baptized. Because of the cross and resurrection it becomes clear to Christians what had occurred: Jesus took on his shoulders the weight of the sin of all humanity; he took it with him into the Jordan. From the beginning of his activity he takes the place of sinners. There begins the anticipation of the cross. He is, so to say, the true Jonah who said to the sailors: take me and throw me into the sea. (Jonah 1:12) The full meaning of the baptism of Jesus, his fulfillment of “all righteousness” (cf Matt 3:15) reviews itself only in the cross: the baptism is the acceptance of death for the sins of humanity, and the voice from heaven “This is my beloved Son” is the anticipated reference to the resurrection. Thus one understands the reason why in his own discourses Jesus uses the word baptism to refer to his own death. (Matt 10:38; Luke 12:50) [p 38]…” *
 
Old Testament prophets were often commanded to live out a type of ‘dinner theater’ as a form of prophecy. They were commanded to build sand castles and knock them down, marry a prostitute, eat dung, etc.

Jesus discovered who he was and what he was to do by properly interpreting the spiritual sense of the OT scriptures.

He then saw the Father had prepared “dinner theater” for him, which he stepped in to, in order to show that he understood his mission. Rather than getting a direct word from the Father, he understood his mission from the OT scriptures, which he then observed in dinner theater action before him.

So what is the ‘dinner theater’ that he saw?

1 Kings 17:3 in the spiritual sense is a picture of John the Baptist.

“Have a manner of life, turned toward eternity. Disguise yourself to separate the people for a possession, separate the presentation of the one who descended.”

John was disguised as Elijah:

Raiment of camel hair - Works with judge’s authority
Girdle of leather - righteousness of the priest’s portion of the burnt offering
meat of locusts - his nourishment was the increase of God’s kingdom
wild honey - passionate nature in the flesh without sin.

The prophecy said that there would be no water/Word of God until Elijah/John.
Who was John’s Word? “In the beginning was the Word…” John’s Word was Christ.

This dinner theater had been set in motion by the Father. When Jesus came upon John and saw the picture, he stepped in and finished the picture by allowing John to “separate the presentation of the one descended”.

The baptism itself is a picture of his own death, burial and resurrection. As he arose, the Father rewarded his obedience with the Holy Spirit as a dove, indicating that in his resurrection he would one again take up his position in Glory.

Jesus could say that he only did what he saw the Father doing, because he only did the things that the Father had set the ‘dinner theater’ in motion for.

So the baptism is more than just a model for us. It was an active dialog between Father and Son, instructing and encouraging the Son to face the cross. In this way he did not need to use one ounce of his divinity to resist the temptations that we face. He was indeed tempted in every way that we are.
 
Yes, Willy Jose and rcjones. Very interesting posts.

Jesus said that it was necessary that He be baptized, as Benedict says, to indicate the imputing of sins to Him.

It is reminiscent of Noah’s flood, where water is a sign of condemnation. That is also the symbolism of total immersion, where we are going under the water to recall the judgment of God. The emergence from the water is the true sign of new birth in Jesus Christ.

You might also observe that Jesus’ emergence from the water is a symbolic foretelling of His resurrection.
 
he did not need to be baptized, we need baptism so he ordained it as a sacrament in accepting the baptism of John so that his relationship in the Trinity could be revealed. he did not need baptism in the sense of needed repentence and cleansing from sin, any more than he “needed” the effects of any of the other instances in which he, and his parents, obeyed the Law. What he “needed” was to fulfill the will of his Father in all instances, as he told John, so that righteousness might be demonstrated for our sake.
 
Yes, Willy Jose and rcjones. Very interesting posts.

Jesus said that it was necessary that He be baptized, as Benedict says, to indicate the imputing of sins to Him.

It is reminiscent of Noah’s flood, where water is a sign of condemnation. That is also the symbolism of total immersion, where we are going under the water to recall the judgment of God. The emergence from the water is the true sign of new birth in Jesus Christ.

You might also observe that Jesus’ emergence from the water is a symbolic foretelling of His resurrection.
Water always represents the Word. There are waters above and and waters below. They represent Holiness and Grace. They were separated in Genesis 1 so that God’s creation could understand God. We cannot comprehend Holiness and Grace together.

The waters below are grace. Besides the symbolism mentioned previously, his baptism also represents Jesus’s choice to not judge the world. He was the righteous judge, but he didn’t come to judge. He was immersed in grace (the waters below). This is similar to John’s story of the wedding at Cana where he made the water into wine.

Water is both Grace and Holiness (as expressed in law and judgment). Wine is grace and strong drink is law. So water is also wine and strong drink together. To make wine from water he had to remove the judgment. (As Elisha removed the axe/judgement from the stream/water/word). By choosing to provide for their need (lack of wine/grace) rather than judge them for their lack, he removed the axe from the water, and made wine. (He is the living Water, he removed judgment from his own heart.)

His baptism, and changing water to wine were both symbols that he came to give grace, not judgment.

The waters which were separated at creation are reconciled once again in Christ at the cross.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top