P
paul_barlow
Guest
please explain how christ is our saviour if he did not remove origial sin
I know it doesn’t answer the question, but hey, I love quoting scripture!And I say unto you again that he cannot save them in their sins; for he cannot deny his word, and he hath said that no unclean thing can inherit the kingdom of heaven; therefore, how can ye be saved, except ye inherit the kingdom of heaven? Therefore, ye cannot be saved in your sins.
our cocept of the god head is more in keeping with scripture than the niecene creed. if God, Jesus and the holy ghost are one without body form or passions then i must have read a diffrent version of the scriptures than you i find your doctrine incorrect. and maybe it could just be that our churchs teachings are correct.I think a better question is how can the savior take away the sins of the world if the father and the son are not consubstantial? If it wasn’t God who died on the cross, how is the sacrifice any more meaningful than if any other spirit child of God died for our sins?
The mormon concept of the Godhead robs Christ of the very power required of him as far as I can tell, whereas the Catholic trinity allows both a clear distinction between the three persons of God while still maintaining a single being called “God” which is absolutely essential to the whole idea of salvation. God had to make himself one of us (not the other way around as eternal progression implies) in order for his sacrifice on the cross to have any effect. There is no amount of metaphysical hoop jumping that can reconcile the Mormon godhead with the Mormon church’s (and every other Christian church’s) teachings on why Christ’s sacrifice was meangingful or even necessary in the first place.
MEP, what you have said here is so true. I didn’t quite get the reality of Christ’s sacrifice until I became Catholic for the very reasons you mention.I think a better question is how can the savior take away the sins of the world if the father and the son are not consubstantial? If it wasn’t God who died on the cross, how is the sacrifice any more meaningful than if any other spirit child of God died for our sins?
The mormon concept of the Godhead robs Christ of the very power required of him as far as I can tell, whereas the Catholic trinity allows both a clear distinction between the three persons of God while still maintaining a single being called “God” which is absolutely essential to the whole idea of salvation. God had to make himself one of us (not the other way around as eternal progression implies) in order for his sacrifice on the cross to have any effect. There is no amount of metaphysical hoop jumping that can reconcile the Mormon godhead with the Mormon church’s (and every other Christian church’s) teachings on why Christ’s sacrifice was meangingful or even necessary in the first place.
Mormon doctrine is in keeping with the Gospel of John? Please explain how the LDS concept of the Godhead fits in with these passages.our cocept of the god head is more in keeping with scripture than the niecene creed. if God, Jesus and the holy ghost are one without body form or passions then i must have read a diffrent version of the scriptures than you i find your doctrine incorrect. and maybe it could just be that our churchs teachings are correct.
Well now that not’s quite accurate. LDS doctrine on the trinity started out right in line with the nicene creed. Read the last line of the testimony of the three witnesses in the BoM. 1 Ne. 13: 41, Alma 11: 35 or this is the best example :our cocept of the god head is more in keeping with scripture than the niecene creed. if God, Jesus and the holy ghost are one without body form or passions then i must have read a diffrent version of the scriptures than you i find your doctrine incorrect. and maybe it could just be that our churchs teachings are correct.
You mean the BOM hasn’t been changed to read “one eternal Godhead” yet? Better write a letter to the LDS church so they can make sure it gets changed in future edits.Well now that not’s quite accurate. LDS doctrine on the trinity started out right in line with the nicene creed. Read the last line of the testimony of the three witnesses in the BoM. 1 Ne. 13: 41, Alma 11: 35 or this is the best example :
Alma 11: 44
“…Christ the Son, and God the Father, and the Holy Spirit, which is one Eternal God…”
Later on as JS ideas on theology changed and he went from a Father who was a spirit being (Bible) to the Father has a body and there is no Trinity in the D&C. Thus the term “Godhead” had to be taught to reconcile the two concepts.