W
wmw
Guest
As for the 2003 data, none of it has been refuted. The age of data does not make it less true today as they were 10 years ago. It’s this new data that is based on less sure ground of not fitting models.
The matter really comes down to, “what is human”? According to Catholicism you may believe in evolution, but at one time a male and a female were made human by the immortal soul being made part of the body & immortal soul union that is human by God. From these two all other people were decendent.
Neanderthals may actually fit some definition of what scientists might think is a sentient being. Any such creature we find on another planet or made in a lab should be given the respect of a human, since only God can tell if its soul may be immortal. Also, we don’t have the knoweldge to question God on whether Neanderthals are to be saved or not.
These are not facts, but Theory and the humans and Neanderthals living in the same century is debated with plenty of conflicting data.Can’t see the reasoning there, since Homo Neanderthalensis and Homo Sapiens actually lived along side of each other for a few tens of thousands of years.
Neanderthals made jewellery, weapons, simple clothing, simple ‘art’, and there is evidence of ritual burial, and of even a little inter species fertilisation.
The matter really comes down to, “what is human”? According to Catholicism you may believe in evolution, but at one time a male and a female were made human by the immortal soul being made part of the body & immortal soul union that is human by God. From these two all other people were decendent.
Neanderthals may actually fit some definition of what scientists might think is a sentient being. Any such creature we find on another planet or made in a lab should be given the respect of a human, since only God can tell if its soul may be immortal. Also, we don’t have the knoweldge to question God on whether Neanderthals are to be saved or not.