Why do fundamentalists believe the world is 6000-10000 years old?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Gift_from_God
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
If its the M31 question I won’t answer it I am happy to admit I have never considered it before. I did not pretend I had all the answers or that I was going to disprove the millions of years theory on the contrary I am asking you to prove this theory to me, been as it is the new theory.

Show me the reasons for you belief
 
If its the M31 question I won’t answer it I am happy to admit I have never considered it before. I did not pretend I had all the answers or that I was going to disprove the millions of years theory on the contrary I am asking you to prove this theory to me been as it is the new theory.
I have already told you carbon dating is not used to date the earth, this has nothing to do with calibration, but to do with the duration of the half life.
 
carbon dating is not used to date the earth. Again how can it be we can see m31?
I presume AlbertBall m31 is a star supposedly millions of years away? Well the answer has two answers, one by faith one by science. The Scriptures tell us God showed man starlight on the day he created Adam and Eve less that 10,000 years ago. We are also told, man still alive will see the stars in chaos on the last day.

From a scientific view I presume you know that measuring the distance of starlight is an assumed science, which of course is not a science. Why science doesnt even know a far star from a near star. So the true distance of stars could well be only a day away, a week away, a year away, 5,000 years away, 10,000 years away. Who knows?
 
I have already told you carbon dating is not used to date the earth, this has nothing to do with calibration, but to do with the duration of the half life.
We are discussing the date of the earth, Rossum bases his belief on the date of the earth on carbon dating are you suggesting he is wrong to do so?
 
We are discussing the date of the earth, Rossum bases his belief on the date of the earth on carbon dating are you suggesting he is wrong to do so?
No he didn’t, he said Carbon dating falsifies your claim the earth is around 10000 years old.
 
I presume AlbertBall m31 is a star supposedly millions of years away? Well the answer has two answers, one by faith one by science. The Scriptures tell us God showed man starlight on the day he created Adam and Eve less that 10,000 years ago. We are also told, man still alive will see the stars in chaos on the last day.

From a scientific view I presume you know that measuring the distance of starlight is an assumed science, which of course is not a science. Why science doesnt even know a far star from a near star. So the true distance of stars could well be only a day away, a week away, a year away, 5,000 years away, 10,000 years away. Who knows?
No m31 is not a star, the rest of you post is very painful to read. Believe me the size of the universe is very much “a science”, a science you clearly know little about given you don’t even know what m31 is.
 
Rossum is correct, in my opinion. I am a Catholic. I am a religionist. Everyone on CAF knows these things about me. But, I work with fossils. I have been to where the layers of earth have been dug up. I have used a hammer and a chisel. I have separated the layers and found extinct creatures, particularly fish. I know those layers are much, much older than 10,000 years. If we wouldn’t try so hard to work the earth into our own peculiar schemes of things, we wouldn’t have this problem.

Merry Christmas and God bless,

jd
What is the science of your dating method? Why do you trust this method?

Dr. Berlinsky has said that there are many methods of dating the age of the earth and most of them point to a young earth.

For instance, we have helium wells in Texas. Why is this the case? Helium is a very small atom and diffuses out of containment. Diffusion rates for helium can be measured, and measurments point to a young age for the earth.

Now explain your method of dating, and why it is scientific.
 
No m31 is not a star, the rest of you post is very painful to read. Believe me the size of the universe is very much “a science”, a science you clearly know little about given you don’t even know what m31 is.
Oh big deal Albert, less of the rhetoric and just tell me what M31 is then. I probably know as much ABOUT science as you do and I never heard of M31. - Unless it is a highway somewhere. Oh, I just googled it in and found it is not a star, but a group of stars known by me as the Andromeda Galaxy.

Now don’t you think what is good enough for a star is applicable to a group of stars Albert?
 
Greenland - The ice is around 12000 feet at the thickest. In the 80’s they went to recover a WWII plane that crashed. There was over 200 feet of ice over the top.

That’s around 5 feet per year give or take.

10000 feet / 5 feet per year = 2000 years. Just sayin…
There is a lot of Greenland. The annual layers are a long way from where the planes were.The airplanes landed near the shore of Greenland, where snow accumulation is rapid, at about 2 m per year. Allowing for some compaction due to the weight of the snow, that accounts for the depth of snow under which they are buried. The planes are also on an active glacier and have moved about 2 km since landing. Ice core dating takes place on stable ice fields, not active glaciers. The interior of Greenland, where ice cores were taken, receives much less snow.

Source: Claim CD410: Airplanes Buried in Ice.
Your creationist sources are lying by omission. Why are you following sources thet ignore one of the Ten Commandments?

rossum
 
Indeed but for that to be reliable the actual rate of decay of the thing you apply it to has to be constant and always uniform.
Correct, which is why scientists have measured radioactive decay rates in the past and have found that they are constant.

For example, supernova SN 1987a produced some short lives radionuclides. Astronomers were able to measure that half life of those radionuclides and confirm that those half lives were the same as those measured on earth now. SN 1987a exploded 168,000 years ago so that observations tells us that decay rates have been constant for that length of time. Other more distant astronomical objects have pushed back the timescale over which decay rates have been measured to be constant. We have enough data to comprehensively refute a 10,000 year old universe.

Scientists do not assume that values are constant, they measure them to check that they are indeed constant. This is a case in point.

rossum
 
There is a lot of Greenland. The annual layers are a long way from where the planes were.The airplanes landed near the shore of Greenland, where snow accumulation is rapid, at about 2 m per year. Allowing for some compaction due to the weight of the snow, that accounts for the depth of snow under which they are buried. The planes are also on an active glacier and have moved about 2 km since landing. Ice core dating takes place on stable ice fields, not active glaciers. The interior of Greenland, where ice cores were taken, receives much less snow.

Source: Claim CD410: Airplanes Buried in Ice.Your creationist sources are lying by omission. Why are you following sources thet ignore one of the Ten Commandments?

rossum
Creationist source?

The Lost Squadron: A Fleet of Warplanes Locked in Ice for Fifty Years

In 1942 a squadron of new U.S. warplanes (two B-17 Flying Fortresses and six P-38 Lightnings) were forced by foul weather to land on Greenland’s vast glacier. The stranded airmen were rescued 11 days later (a story in itself, told here), but the planes had to be abandoned. This entertaining, large-format book, for which Hayes (No Easy Answers) interviewed participants in the search for the last squadron and veterans of the 1942 forced landing, illustrated with some 300 color photos, tells how the “lost squadron” was located by radar four decades later under 260 feet of ice. One Lightning was brought to the surface in 1992 and transported to a hangar in Middlesboro, Ky., where it is undergoing reconstruction. The effort, funded by private investors, required eight expeditions over a period of 11 years. More than a technical chronicle of a unique archeological project, Hayes’s text also recounts the organizational and emotional dynamics of the venture and the tensions that occasionally erupted in physical violence. For aviation enthusiasts and armchair adventurers.
Copyright 1994 Reed Business Information, Inc. –This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.
 
For the problem of the age of Earth (according to the Bible) and the dinosaurs. The Bible says nothing about how much time Adam & Eve spent in heaven. They were immortal (but the other animals weren’t) and if, for example, they were created 8 million years ago (along with dinosaurs and such) Adam & Eve lived but the dinosaurs died and became fossils. And then 7.9 million years later they would eat the forbidden fruit.

Anyway, I can’t say whether this is true or not, since it is just a theory I came up right now.
Are you saying that Adam and Eve lived in Heaven before they lived on earth? If so, that is the false doctrine of the preexistence and it contradicts scripture which clearly shows that they were created on the earth.
 
Are you saying that Adam and Eve lived in Heaven before they lived on earth? If so, that is the false doctrine of the preexistence and it contradicts scripture which clearly shows that they were created on the earth.
I found that to be a strange post. One of the things about this thread comes back to the idea that Church teaching does not require a believe in creationism. A God guided evolution is fine by Church teaching. Think of the incredible awesome power of God shown in billions of years of creation. Since he is outside of time…what is so hard to accept about it? BTW…can you imagine God trying to explain to Moses the theory of relativity in Scripture?
 
The question of the age of the universe is irrelevant to the task of religion

This is a point I think both sides can agree upon.

Just as we, as individuals, may be the only ‘Bible’ some will ever read, the Earth is a ‘book’ with as many mysteries as God Himself. God gave man the ability to reason in an effort to understand the many complicities of our Earth, to attempt, as it were, to ‘read’ the hidden messages beneath its surface and beyond its sky. In this regard, I am willing to accept the vast scientific evidence that supports the age of the Earth to be be between 13.65 billion years and 13.7 billion years old.

I am still somewhat sleep deprived, but I hope there was something rational to my above thoughts!

Merry Christmas!
Peace, good will…
It is very relevant since the Church has and will continue to comment about any claims made by science regarding man’s true origin. The Church has declared the universe has a finite age.

Peace,
Ed
 
I found that to be a strange post. One of the things about this thread comes back to the idea that Church teaching does not require a believe in creationism. A God guided evolution is fine by Church teaching. Think of the incredible awesome power of God shown in billions of years of creation. Since he is outside of time…what is so hard to accept about it? BTW…can you imagine God trying to explain to Moses the theory of relativity in Scripture?
I find nothing awesome about billions of years of creation. What I do find awesome is Jesus giving sight to the blind instantly, cleansing the lepers instantly and raising the dead instantly. These are things God can do.

Peace,
Ed
 
Here is a problem I have run into:
  1. As Christians we are taught that death entered creation through man’s sin.
  2. The earth is billions of years old, and countless speices had gone extinct before the evotution of man.
    I am not able to reconcile the two statements.
    I have submited this to different appologist, and no one has replied.
    Any thoughts? Is this bad theology?
Thanks.
Phil
 
Here is a problem I have run into:
  1. As Christians we are taught that death entered creation through man’s sin.
  2. The earth is billions of years old, and countless speices had gone extinct before the evotution of man.
    I am not able to reconcile the two statements.
    I have submited this to different appologist, and no one has replied.
    Any thoughts? Is this bad theology?
Thanks.
Phil
Humans die because of sin. I think animals die because it’s a different way of life for them. I’ve heard that animals have material souls or something like that
 
Oh big deal Albert, less of the rhetoric and just tell me what M31 is then. I probably know as much ABOUT science as you do and I never heard of M31. - Unless it is a highway somewhere. Oh, I just googled it in and found it is not a star, but a group of stars known by me as the Andromeda Galaxy.

Now don’t you think what is good enough for a star is applicable to a group of stars Albert?
It’s 2.5 million light years away- this means the light that enters our eyes and is processed by our brains left that galaxy 2.5 million years ago.
 
Here is a problem I have run into:
  1. As Christians we are taught that death entered creation through man’s sin.
  2. The earth is billions of years old, and countless speices had gone extinct before the evotution of man.
    I am not able to reconcile the two statements.
    I have submited this to different appologist, and no one has replied.
    Any thoughts? Is this bad theology?
I assume that you are thinking about Romans 5:12 “Therefore as sin came into the world through one man and death through sin, and so death spread to all men because all men sinned.”

I would just point out that this verse says that death “spread to all men” and talks about “all men” sinning. It is talking about the death of men, not the death of plants or animals. Plants and animals cannot sin. During all those billions of years there were no men because men had not yet evolved. If there were no men than no men could sin and no men could die.

HTH

rossum
 
Humans die because of sin. I think animals die because it’s a different way of life for them. I’ve heard that animals have material souls or something like that
believe it or not the answer can only be found in Catholic bibles which contain the Book of Wisdom.God and death do not go together for God is life.So how and why and when did death of humans and animals[see Wisdom 1:13-14].When Adam fell the whole of creation fell with him.It is a mistake to think this was millions of years after animals were created and were dying before Adams sin for humans and animals were created together.God did not see the millions of skeletons of dead things torn about and savaged to death and then create Adam and say to him,look at the “very good” world I have created for you - twinc
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top