Why do gays want marriage? What do they hope gain from it?

  • Thread starter Thread starter sweetcharity
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Ok, so let’s take the next step. Why are there fewer and fewer people willing to accept and embrace Church teaching? Not just on this issue, but on many other social issues?

I have many friends who have ZERO issue with the words of the Creed, but cannot commit to the Church because of social issues like divorce, birth control and gay marriage. Why does the message of the Creed still resonate but not the other issues?

I realize I may be drifting off-topic here, but I think that is a question that needs to be answered.
You seem to imply (in your comments) that the Church should be doing something different – something other than teach that divorce is wrong and that SSM is illegitimate. Why not ask: What forces in society are leading people away from God’s truth?
 
Dear Lord, what is your obsession with trying to make ME the enemy??? Where did I say ANYTHING close to what you’re indicating?

I’ll try this AGAIN.

Society (NOT ME PERSONALLY) has seemingly rejected the teachings of the Church in the matter of divorce. What has happened in the last 40 years that has changed society’s (NOT MY PERSONAL) opinion? Have we as a church failed to convey the message of Christ to the world?
You are the Church. Do you seek to evangelize your gay friends? I think you are in a unique position to offer a great ministry.
I have PERSONALLY given up what society says I need in order to stay within the graces of the Church because I have been convinced by good people that there is no other place to find the truth. Why did that work for me but not for so many others?
This is highly commendable, Seeker, and I respect your commitment to God. Turning from sexual immorality (or any “pleasure” sin) is a very difficult thing to do. Perhaps God is calling you to minister to those who can identify with the cross you bear…
 
Your point (and mine) is that the LGBT community will work to persuade the American public. This contradicts Seeker’s assertion that they simply want to live their lives without bothering anyone or haranguing those with traditional views of marriage.
Like I said, the LGBT is a blanket term. There is no organisation that is the LGBT community - the term covers every single person that considers themselves gay, lesbian, bisexual or transgender. You can’t tell me that every single one of these people only wants marriage so people accept homosexuality. That’s absurd. Besides, I’d imagine most of them would be more rational minded, and would know that SSM wouldn’t make that happen.
Well you will see first hand for yourself if ssm becomes legal everywhere. Catholics still will not acknowledge this as true marriage. SSM participants will still feel upset and unfulfilled because of that.
Whatever you say, dear.
 
Q. Why do gays want marriage?
A. Satan
Are you joking? Maybe that should be part of a new pro-gay campaign. “Satan supports same-sex marriage. Do you?”

No.
Q. What do they hope to gain from it?
A. The object is intrinsically evil, so their intention, even if a self-delusional good, cannot make the act good. The only extenuating circumstance might be absolute chastity within the relationship, but in order for the act to be good, the object, intention, and circumstance must all be good, and this is impossible. (Moral Theology 101).
You didn’t really directly answer the question, you just stated that it was evil, but I noticed that you implied that homosexuals want marriage so people accept homosexuality. Once again, I’ll claim this is an absurd thing to say, and an extremely broad statement, and isn’t a claim you can ever prove.
 
Are you joking? Maybe that should be part of a new pro-gay campaign. “Satan supports same-sex marriage. Do you?”

No.

You didn’t really directly answer the question, you just stated that it was evil, but I noticed that you implied that homosexuals want marriage so people accept homosexuality. Once again, I’ll claim this is an absurd thing to say, and an extremely broad statement, and isn’t a claim you can ever prove.
I answered the original question, from a moral theological standpoint. You don’t believe in absolute morality or in God, which means we have no common ground for discussion in moral theology- a subject which you clearly do not understand or seek to understand. Having no background, you can only result to mockery.
 
I doubt this. Part of believing in ‘one holy, catholic and apostolic church’ is granting that its moral teachings are to be followed. That these creed-loving friends of yours think the Church is teaching moral error in at least three areas—divorce, artificial contraception, and same-sex marriage–means they think Christ is teaching moral error for he is the head of the Church!
Yes, these heterodox “friends” clearly do not understand the Creed, which is deeply theological. Implicit in this deeply theological Creed is an acceptance of the teachings of the Magisterium- which absolutely condemns same sex “marriage.”

Pointing out that some Catholics are in serious error about same sex “marriage” only shows that- some Catholics are in serious error about same sex “marriage!” It proves nothing, although the strategy is transparently clear- encourage division, doubt, and discord.
 
Can I tell you someone won’t sue? No, of course not, all kinds of people file lawsuits, including those that cannot be won for a variety of reasons.

Will the Supreme Court ever find against churches in this matter?

Never. Not in this country. Freedom of religion is the religion of the US.

I doubt any lower court would, either.
I hope that you are right about the courts, but I doubt you are. There will surely be a new court in the coming years. If the President is reelected, it is highly likely that the court will be more liberal in its interpretation of the Constitution. From that anything will be possible.

Pray that if/when the HHS Mandate reaches the courts, that it is struck down in a landslide.
 
Oh really Julia Mae, and then how come this is still rejected by many scientists? It doesn’t seen that your sentence is accurate.

sciencemag.org/content/284/5414/665.short ← This study finds that the hypothesis of women passing through the X chromosome the genetic predisposition for their male offspring to be homosexual is not observed.

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1678219/pdf/bmj00033-0005.pdf ← This is a critical review opposing your statement, Julia.

Lastly,

ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/content/12/3/259.short

This study of Public Opinion finds that the more likely people believe that homosexual is genetic, then they are more likely to support homosexuality marriages. However, the evidence on homosexuality as a genetic trait is not favorable, and clear cuts as many think.
Still relevant
 
I doubt this. Part of believing in ‘one holy, catholic and apostolic church’ is granting that its moral teachings are to be followed. That these creed-loving friends of yours think the Church is teaching moral error in at least three areas—divorce, artificial contraception, and same-sex marriage–means they think Christ is teaching moral error for he is the head of the Church!
It doesn’t mean “Catholic,” like Roman Catholic; it means “universal.” And a lot of Christians use the creed, not just Catholics. And some of those churches marry same sex couples.
 
I hope that you are right about the courts, but I doubt you are. There will surely be a new court in the coming years. If the President is reelected, it is highly likely that the court will be more liberal in its interpretation of the Constitution. From that anything will be possible.
I don’t care how liberal they are, church and state is an inviolable concept.
Pray that if/when the HHS Mandate reaches the courts, that it is struck down in a landslide.
No, I don’t have a problem with it and don’t want it struck down.
 
It doesn’t mean “Catholic,” like Roman Catholic; it means “universal.” And a lot of Christians use the creed, not just Catholics. And some of those churches marry same sex couples.
The Catholic Church cannot prevent other churches from using the Nicene Creed- or from “marrying” same sex couples. If other churches want to “marry” same sex couples, it only proves that those other churches are in error. So what, is that news?
 
I don’t care how liberal they are, church and state is an inviolable concept.

No, I don’t have a problem with it and don’t want it struck down.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;

So you disregard the “inviolable concept of church and state” regarding HHS? :confused:
 
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;

So you disregard the “inviolable concept of church and state” regarding HHS? :confused:
Nope, because it doesn’t violate it. But explaining would get us way off-topic in this thread. Go post in a thread about HHS and send me a link in PM if you want to discuss it with me and I’ll post there.
 
I doubt this. Part of believing in ‘one holy, catholic and apostolic church’ is granting that its moral teachings are to be followed. That these creed-loving friends of yours think the Church is teaching moral error in at least three areas—divorce, artificial contraception, and same-sex marriage–means they think Christ is teaching moral error for he is the head of the Church!
Ok, let’s say this another way. My friends believe in the Trinity, they believe in the life, death and resurrection of Jesus, they believe in baptism…their problems come in with birth control, divorce and gay marriage. It doesn’t mean they think it’s an error, they struggle with the understanding. It’s what has led many of them to Protestant churches or out of church altogether.
You seem to imply (in your comments) that the Church should be doing something different – something other than teach that divorce is wrong and that SSM is illegitimate. Why not ask: What forces in society are leading people away from God’s truth?
I think the Church should be doing something different because we are clearly not communicating the link between the Gospel of Jesus and the social issues of today. People aren’t seeing the big picture. And yes, it’s easy to blame “Satan” because then it’s no longer our fault. We can wash our hands of all those souls and continue to bask in our moral superiority.
 
I think the Church should be doing something different because we are clearly not communicating the link between the Gospel of Jesus and the social issues of today. People aren’t seeing the big picture. And yes, it’s easy to blame “Satan” because then it’s no longer our fault. We can wash our hands of all those souls and continue to bask in our moral superiority.
I think the Church is doing a great job here: artificial contraception, abortion, euthanasia, embryonic stem-cell research, and same-sex marriage are all terrible things, great wrongs. The Church is right about them all. This should be a clear sign to the faithful that their Church is a much surer guide in moral matters than opinion polls and sentiment.
 
I think the Church is doing a great job here: artificial contraception, abortion, euthanasia, embryonic stem-cell research, and same-sex marriage are all terrible things, great wrongs. The Church is right about them all. This should be a clear sign to the faithful that their Church is a much surer guide in moral matters than opinion polls and sentiment.
Why are these things terrible things?

How/why is the church right about them?

The church has been wrong about moral issues before, why should we listen to them on subjects like same sex marriage?
 
Why are these things terrible things?
What is terrible about abortion, embryonic stem cell research, and euthanasia should be obvious: they are the deliberate destruction of human beings. (Thou shalt not kill and all that.) Advocacy for same-sex marriage stems from a confusion about marriage and sexuality. (Same-sex couples cannot make a marriage and homosexual acts are depraved and harm those who perform them.) The use of artificial contraception is wrong in itself and the widespread use of it has so decayed normal moral thinking----the only reason many people NOW think same-sex marriage is fine is that they’ve been using contraceptives all their lives and think sex has nothing to do with children (-unless, you know, you happen to be into the whole biological family thing)— that people a) think abortion, embryonic stem-cell research and euthanasia are fine and b) that they know this because they’re so morally astute, not like that backward old Church.

I actually have more respect for people who say, “Hey, I don’t CARE if abortion is murder, I don’t want a kid” than I do for people who argue that it is not only moral, but, you know, Catholic!
 
Advocacy for same-sex marriage stems from a confusion about marriage and sexuality.
No, it doesn’t. I’m sorry, but just because you believe this with all your heart, it’s just totally untrue and all you have to do is look at the reasons people do advocate for it.

I am, believe me, completely clear on marriage and sexuality as per the Catholic Church. My advocacy for SSM is based on nothing contrary to those teachings. So, you are wrong.
 
I am, believe me, completely clear on marriage and sexuality as per the Catholic Church. My advocacy for SSM is based on nothing contrary to those teachings.
What parts of ‘marriage is a Holy Sacrament’ and ‘sex between two people of the same gender is gravely disordered’ don’t you get?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top