T
thephilosopher6
Guest
See, there you go with your ad hominem again. Projecting much?
Suggesting you read up on Theosis is hardly an ad hominemSee, there you go with your ad hominem again. Projecting much?
From reading your posts, no you don’tI know what Theosis is.
I don’t see where anyone suggested you are DOING anything against the Church. It is your belief that Mormons receive Christian baptisms, and are therefore Christian, which goes against the teaching of the Church.I’m not doing anything against the Church, and I fully support Mormon converts also being baptized as part of their conversion to the Catholic church.
Are you suggesting that the Mormon Church believes in Theosis as the Catholic Church does?You might want to bone up on Theosis, before you keep throwing rocks.
They also baptize living people in place of the dead who were not baptized in life. It ain’t right.Yep. Mormon baptisms are not valid, which means, they are not actually baptisms.
Yeah. I performed hundreds and hundreds of those baptisms. Sorry to say …They also baptize living people in place of the dead who were not baptized in life. It ain’t right.
Stephen, @thephilosopher6 very clearly said I wasI don’t see where anyone suggested you are DOING anything against the Church. It is your belief that Mormons receive Christian baptisms, and are therefore Christian, which goes against the teaching of the Church.
As an observation, even most protestant denominations have doctrine that goes against the teaching of the Church. If they didn’t, they’d be Catholic. LDS and JW differences are just more numerous and significant.@thephilosopher6: I am informing you that you are going against the Church.
Anyone who read your complete conversation with thephilosopher6, and speaks English as a first language would know he was talking about belief, not action.Stephen, @thephilosopher6 very clearly said I was
Correct, Mormons are not Christian according to the teaching of the Catholic Church.As an observation, even most protestant denominations have doctrine that goes against the teaching of the Church. If they didn’t, they’d be Catholic. LDS and JW differences are just more numerous and significant.
Don’t put words in my mouth I didn’t say. I only quoted @thephilosopher6 and disagreed with his statement.Anyone who read your complete conversation with thephilosopher6, and speaks English as a first language would know he was talking about belief, not action.
Anyone that speaks English as a first language could see I wasn’t putting words in your mouth. I’m glad you agree that Mormons are not Christian according to the teaching of the Catholic Church.Don’t put words in my mouth I didn’t say. I only quoted @thephilosopher6 and disagreed with his statement.
Also, nothing I have said was even ‘against’ Church belief. I referenced the dictionary definition, something you would expect non-Catholics to reference. I never suggested LDS meet the Catholic definition, nor should they be seen so.
Verse 4 is clearly not Trinitarian. (Perhaps when you say Joseph Smith started out as a Trinitarian you had another verse or statement in mind. Please share if this is the case.)1 And now Abinadi said unto them: I would that ye should understand that God himself shall come down among the children of men, and shall redeem his people.
2 And because he dwelleth in flesh he shall be called the Son of God, and having subjected the flesh to the will of the Father, being the Father and the Son—
3 The Father, because he was conceived by the power of God; and the Son, because of the flesh; thus becoming the Father and Son—
4 And they are one God, yea, the very Eternal Father of heaven and of earth.
Joseph Smith started out as a Trinitarian. His views of God were constantly changing.
Puh-lease, the whole purpose of this thread is to proselytize Latter-day Saints.Bearing your testimony is against forum rules because it is proselytizing.
Verse 4 is consistent with 1 thru 6 in a proper understanding of the Trinity.Verse 4 is clearly not Trinitarian. (Perhaps when you say Joseph Smith started out as a Trinitarian you had another verse or statement in mind. Please share if this is the case.)
The definition of the Trinity includes the following assertions:
The Father is God.
The Son is God.
The Holy Spirit is God.
The Father is not the Son.
The Father is not the Holy Spirit.
The Son is not the Holy Spirit.
(There’s other stuff too, like the the hypostatic union of Jesus’ natures and consubstantiality of the Three Persons. Knowledgeable forum members can fill in any gaps I’ve missed.)
Anyway, verse 4 you cite above violates assertion 4. Declaring that the Son is the Father contradicts Trinitarian doctrine.