M
Mosacked
Guest
I mean, they had to to excuse his factually recorded act of pedophilia as written in their islamic hadiths (authoritative islamic book of Bukhari) and instead put the blame as ‘culturally practised pedohilia’ which none of them can prove was really practised back then.
They had to excuse his lying to the quaryish tribesmen (Ishaq 166) as a moment of weakness, and they had to excuse his jumping at a common eclipse as humanly fear and some of them even blame instead muhammad’s adopted son for marrying muhammad’s wife first before passing her to muhammad (as requested by islam’s allah which only muhammad could see/hear)
And after excusing the man for all these ‘failures’ they elevate him to prophethood status.
I mean, no offence but what’s the logic? Why accept (if we view it purely on the facts of the case) an otherwise shamefully self-justified sinner as greatest prophet???
See this:
muslimsopenyoureyes.blogspot.com
.
They had to excuse his lying to the quaryish tribesmen (Ishaq 166) as a moment of weakness, and they had to excuse his jumping at a common eclipse as humanly fear and some of them even blame instead muhammad’s adopted son for marrying muhammad’s wife first before passing her to muhammad (as requested by islam’s allah which only muhammad could see/hear)
And after excusing the man for all these ‘failures’ they elevate him to prophethood status.
I mean, no offence but what’s the logic? Why accept (if we view it purely on the facts of the case) an otherwise shamefully self-justified sinner as greatest prophet???
See this:
muslimsopenyoureyes.blogspot.com
.