I don’t think this is a fair characterization. If you read the post I linked you to in my other post (
here it is again, if you missed it), there are Christians who resist the state of affairs. That the majority do not resist in any obvious or violent way is no surprise. The majority of middle eastern Christians no longer live in the M.E., anyway, so who is going to support any uprising? The militaries of these countries? America? Israel? I don’t think so. So I don’t think it is a case of Stockholm Syndrome at all.
Agreed.
Indeed. We’re doing so right now, no?
I should be so blessed to ever be like Abouna Chacour!
I
Yes, it is a historical fact that most of the growth of Islam came from conversion of non-Muslims, forced or otherwise.
I don’t think Muslims are useless at all. I think Islam is a terrible ideology, but that doesn’t make Muslims useless. It makes them adherents of a terrible ideology.
No. I think you’re off here. The current state of affairs is what ISLAM has produced. This is part of the problem I was talking about in my reply when I said that we do ourselves a disservice by framing everything in terms of Islam (or Islam vs. everything else). I refuse to buy into the Islamic historical narrative of lands that only became Islamic by force to begin with. I don’t see Iraq, Lebanon, North Africa, or anywhere outside of Arabia proper as “Muslim land”. It is Muslim-occupied land. As long as they continue their stranglehold over every inch of territory they’ve ever set foot on (or obsession over what they lost; e.g., talking about the Crusades as though they are still going on), I will not give Islam’s view of the world any credence.
Islam is not the Middle East, and the Middle East is not Islam. Here is another link that I’ve put up before that you might not have seen that will hopefully make the point more convincingly to you than I ever could:
What Arab Civilization?
Resist the Islamicization of history.