Why do non-Catholics keep saying dead people who are in heaven cannot hear our prayers?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bill_Pick
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
But I have asked you to look to what early Christians believed and understood … [and I would consider that “Catholic” but in reality and historically they can be looked to as early Christian witnesses] … and as I have noted early grave markers have the phrase "Pray for me’ [the inhabitant] and references to prayers of Saints already passed “… pary for us”

Scripture gives a a glimpse … when you say they cannot hear … and scripture shows they can … when you say they cannot know aboutearthly concerns and they do …
Where did I say any such thing? You are railing against things I never said.
added to the belief and practices from the earliest Christian’s… which I have mentioned in other posts …

You see - we do not look to scriptures wriiten over a period of time after the existance of the Church to be the sole basis from which we look at our faith … and as I have pointed out … it is faith … we cannot know first hand … we look to the evidence …

You say that the only evidence you will look at is Scripture … **Wow. amazing amounts of assumptions About what I believe accept and do. wanna give some examples based on facts?
I will look at Scripture "to be ignorant of scripture is to be ignorant of Christ"
Jerome or Clement - I forget at this moment :o] … but I also will look at the early patristic writings, the church througout the ages, even archeology and liturature.

Also, though I am sure you would discount personal testimony, I know many people who have asked for a Saint’s prayers and had them answered … by God … where the person is certain it was through the Saint … however, while I may find some individuals carried away there are some who I find very credible …
No I wont count personal testimony as infailable evidence. but that isn’t the same as discounting it out of hand, many of the early Christians were very wise. IF you are interested in further debate please give some evidence of what you are saying and drop the wild assumptions about what I believe and what I might say next and let me speak for myself. Otherwise you can just argue with yourself some more, you seem to be enjoying it so far.
 
Paul is telling the Thessalonians not to live in despair for those who have gone ahead of them in the Lord. The passage you cited is out of context.
I know that’s what he is saying. But if he really wanted to comfort them, why didn’t he tell them they could talk to those in heaven if they wanted?
The writer of Hebrews speaks of “a great cloud of witnesses” that surround us on earth.
What do witnesses do?
Uh, witness things?
You again take Rom 8:1 out of context. There is a qualifier(s) to that verse are in v. 9]“if in fact the Spirit of God dwells in you.” & v. 17]"… provided we suffer with him in order that we may also be glorified with him."
“May”, “if”, “provided”; you really should look at the who passage in its context before to take one phrase in isolation and expound an entire doctrine off of that one phrase. Paul has always been known for being a very deep and thoughtful writer, but also rather long-winded.
Well, sure. But don’t all children of God have the Spirit living in them? And don’t they all suffer?
Here’s a question. It says in Galations 2 that Peter, who you say is the first pope, sinned. Paul says he “was clearly in the wrong” and other Jews “joined him in his hypocrisy”. Now, if Peter had fallen over dead immediately after this, without repenting, where would he have gone? Heaven? Purgatory? I’m just curious to see what you think.
It’s also funny that you cite Ephesians 1, whic at the end of the chapter says something about the Church: [22] and he has put all things under his feet and has made him the head over all things for the church,
[23] which is his body, the fulness of him who fills all in all."
If the Church is the fullness of Him who fills all in all, how can any Protestant say that there exists no authority outside the bible? [see also 1 Tim 3:15])
I think I’ll save that for another thread.
OSAS is not biblical. The bible talks about how our sins hold Jesus up to contempt and in sinning we re-crucify Him. God’s mercy does not negate His justice. It is unwise to make light the issue of sin. God saw sin as so offensive that He sent His only Son to suffer and die a humiliating death on a cross. What do you think God likes more, a heart full of prideful confidence, or a heart full of humility and contrition?
I know our sin is heartbreaking and offensive to God. Of course I wouldn’t make light of it. But I think that is why God’s grace is so unbelievably amazing. That if we just believe, we are justified; that if we confess, we are saved.
Of course God likes humility more than pride(Proverbs 3:34). But I think I should approach God not pridefully, but humble that He, not I, has saved me, confident in his grace (Hebrews 4:16).
Heb 10:[26] For if we sin deliberately after receiving the knowledge of the truth, there no longer remains a sacrifice for sins,
[27] but a fearful prospect of judgment, and a fury of fire which will consume the adversaries. [28] A man who has violated the law of Moses dies without mercy at the testimony of two or three witnesses.
[29] How much worse punishment do you think will be deserved by the man who has spurned the Son of God, and profaned the blood of the covenant by which he was sanctified, and outraged the Spirit of grace?
God’s grace is a gift that can be rejected by the very act of our sinning. Hebrews speaks very plainly that if we sin after our incorporation into Christ’s body His sacrifice no longer remains in us. By our sin we have “spurned the blood” of Christ and “outraged the Spirit of grace.” How can one continue in unrepented sin and yet still claim to live a life of grace in the Spirit when by your sin you have outraged that very same Spirit?
Well, yeah. If you sin deliberately then you are rejecting God’s grace. If you refuse salvation after learning about it, then there really is nothing left to save you. Jesus even said some would fall away after hearing the word(Mark 4). I believe if a person truly accepts salvation and doesn’t turn away, then they can trust in God to save them, even though they still live imperfect lives on earth.
If we don’t need to worry about our sin why does Paul write so much in his letters about avoiding sin?
Well, we should always try to live more like Christ. Even though Jesus died for our sins, we should obviously try not to sin.
Paul tells us that praying for one another is “acceptable in the sight of God our Savior.”
1 Tim 2:[1] First of all, then, I urge that supplications, prayers, intercessions, and thanksgivings be made for all men, (Paul makes no distinction between those on earth or those who have died in Christ)
[2] for kings and all who are in high positions, that we may lead a quiet and peaceable life, godly and respectful in every way.
[3] This is good, and it is acceptable in the sight of God our Savior,
[4] who desires all men to be saved and to come to the knowledge of the truth.
That is not talking about praying to people, but for people. Of course we should pray for everyone.
James 5:[14] Is any among you sick? Let him call for the elders of the church, and let them pray over him, anointing him with oil in the name of the Lord;
[15] and the prayer of faith will save the sick man, and the Lord will raise him up; and if he has committed sins, he will be forgiven.
[16] Therefore confess your sins to one another, and pray for one another, that you may be healed. The prayer of a righteous man has great power in its effects.
I know we should pray for each other. It is just asking those in heaven to pray for us that I find odd.
 
I think you know what I mean …

These saints no longer walk in this world … eating supper with us, going to work …

They are not ‘dead’ to consiousness of this world … as the saints who ask for vindication in the book of Revelation illustrate [and many other passages like the Rich Man and Lazarus for one other example]… they [the saints] know of earthly events, they are told more events will occur among their brothers and sisters in Christ … that their numbers [those who have died on earth and risen in heaven to new life] will increase …

Do you really believe that Jesus is the Lord of the dead … no, our god is the God of the Living not the dead … we have EVERLASTING LIFE … what does everlasting mean to you :confused:
I’m glad you asked me about everlasting life, YADA. I believe in the everlasting life described in John 3:16. “that whosoever believeth in me shall not perish, but HAVE everlasting life.” I believe that when I accepted the Lord as my Saviour, He gave me life, everlasting life, and I shall NEVER perish. I don’t believe a Christian can go from life to death if they sin to life to death again. When I die, my everlasting spirit will simply move from my body to my home in Heaven, but I don’t expect to be hearing the voices of my friends and relatives praying to me when I get to Heaven. I believe only God can hear those voices.
 
it talks about asking our friend or loved one (who is alive) to pray for us (and praying for others). There is no support found in any passage in scripture for praying to dead men we presume to be saints … period! Nor will any apostolic tradition help you. This is a man made doctrine invented by the Roman imagination (already inundated with centuries of pagan imagery). Just look at the striking similarity between the concept of patronage and the way the Roman major and minor gods were worshipped. Roman pagans ascribed each god to an occupation, location, and so on (the same exact methodology carried over into invocation to saints).
We are to mark the saint or take note of them… SO the only church that really does this is the catholic/orthodox churches… which is called canonization Php 3:17 Brethren, join in imitating me, and mark those who so live as you have an example in us.

and In hebrews 12 the saints that we come to are cloud of witnesses in verse one , so the common teaching that saints can not hear us because they are dead goes against the bible in the sense that they are witness to us…And guess what if you read revelation the angel takes the prayers of the saint to God , mediates the prayers to god… (Rev. 8) and Jesus is the high priest the one mediator… For priest mediate , we are all priest and we also only mediate in jesus name Mary, the saints, and the angel ,who clear mediates, the prayers of all the saint to God in rev. 8…
 

Isn’t there a slight difference between them, & God ? What is true of God, is not always true of them; which is why no one says, “We believe in Saints Peter & Paul, creators of heaven & earth…” 🙂

God is Omniscient - is St. Teresa of Avila ? And so on: some Divine attributes & works are God’s alone; so not all statements about God are applicable to them: St. John Baptist is no more simple, eternal, uncreated, infinite than the Apostles or martyrs. Holiness OTOH can be conferred on mere creatures, as can the moral & intellectual & theological virtues, so that they are elevated by grace to a participation in the Divine Life which would otherwise be necessary, but impossible, for them.
But we’re not talking about Peter and Paul creating heaven and earth. We’re talking about Peter and Paul cooperating with God, working with God.

If God the Son while on earth conferred on the apostles works and authority that were rightfully His to be done in His name, does that take away from God’s glory if He allows them to continue those works from heaven?

This is hardly intercession - it’s a plea for Divine vengeance. 🙂

intercession=plea-ing. They’re asking for something from God. The act is the same.

That doesn’t prove anything about intercession by the Saints in heaven. And the context does not favour such an interpretation. And - what is that “golden altar” for ? the answer is important, because the GA is important. If it were not important to the passage & the book, why is it there ?​

Why stop at the altar? Why is the gold censor important? The incense, the lamps(candles). The Catholic answer is that the angel is performing liturgical actions.

The answer about the issue of the prayers within the incense comes from the response to the prayers: the angel “took the censer and filled it with fire from the altar and threw it on the earth; and there were peals of thunder, voices, flashes of lightning, and an earthquake.”

God acts upon the prayers of those in heaven.
 
too funny…i was taught that in the sda…as a current non-christian, i rejected all that twaddle long ago…fd…🙂
 
I know that’s what he is saying. But if he really wanted to comfort them, why didn’t he tell them they could talk to those in heaven if they wanted?
Have you ever said any words directed to a loved one who has previously passed away while standing at their grave?
Uh, witness things?
Don’t witnesses also testify?
Well, sure. But don’t all children of God have the Spirit living in them? And don’t they all suffer?
Here’s a question. It says in Galations 2 that Peter, who you say is the first pope, sinned. Paul says he “was clearly in the wrong” and other Jews “joined him in his hypocrisy”. Now, if Peter had fallen over dead immediately after this, without repenting, where would he have gone? Heaven? Purgatory? I’m just curious to see what you think.
I don’t know, I’m not God. I am not wise enough to know all ends. And I am not haughty enough to presume to judge where someone “might” have gone. That sort of speculation serves no purpose here.
I know our sin is heartbreaking and offensive to God. Of course I wouldn’t make light of it. But I think that is why God’s grace is so unbelievably amazing. That if we just believe, we are justified; that if we confess, we are saved.
Of course God likes humility more than pride(Proverbs 3:34). But I think I should approach God not pridefully, but humble that He, not I, has saved me, confident in his grace (Hebrews 4:16).
The collory is that you believe that Catholics believe that we can save ourselves. Please provide me with the paragragh from the Catechism where the Church teaches this?
Well, yeah. If you sin deliberately then you are rejecting God’s grace. If you refuse salvation after learning about it, then there really is nothing left to save you. Jesus even said some would fall away after hearing the word(Mark 4). I believe if a person truly accepts salvation and doesn’t turn away, then they can trust in God to save them, even though they still live imperfect lives on earth.
Well, we should always try to live more like Christ. Even though Jesus died for our sins, we should obviously try not to sin.
I am happy we agree.
That is not talking about praying to people, but for people. Of course we should pray for everyone.
Have you ever read Shakespear, pray tell?

By asking someone to pray for you, you are praying to them to pray for you. You are asking them for a favor. It is all one in the same.
I know we should pray for each other. It is just asking those in heaven to pray for us that I find odd.
Believe me it took me some time too; I am a convert. But when you stop looking at God as merely a boss or a judge and realize Him as more of a Father who loves His children and who is not offended but glories in the things His children accomplish for His glory, the fear will melt away.

God the Father is happy to allow His children to cooperate with Him in His works. It’s not that God can’t answer prayers good enough or that He has lost any of His glory or omnipotence. He wants to share His very life with His children. In this sharing of life and love comes with it the intercession and aid of us on earth. This is His will, it has always been His will.

God didn’t have to send His Son, born of a woman, to die on the cross. He could’ve just snapped His fingers and we’d all be saved in a instant because He “desires all men to be saved…”(2 Tim 2:4). But He didn’t. Why? Because that was His will.

I’m not trying to say that you’re completely wrong and I’m right. I’m not saying that you have a responsibility to go out right now and start praying to the saints.

I’m just trying to convey to you and other Protestants that we Catholics and Orthodox Christians have good reasons to believe the way we do.
 
I’m glad you asked me about everlasting life, YADA. I believe in the everlasting life described in John 3:16. “that whosoever believeth in me shall not perish, but HAVE everlasting life.” I believe that when I accepted the Lord as my Saviour, He gave me life, everlasting life, and I shall NEVER perish. I don’t believe a Christian can go from life to death if they sin to life to death again. When I die, my everlasting spirit will simply move from my body to my home in Heaven, but I don’t expect to be hearing the voices of my friends and relatives praying to me when I get to Heaven. I believe only God can hear those voices.
So you believe in once saved alaways saved 🤷… St Paul would not have joined you … he was "working out’ his salvation, afraid that in the end he might “lose” … but that is a whole different topic …

I’ve lost count of who made which point …

Let me just say that I have spoken with some former protestants - now catholics … about the communion of saints and their pre-catholic experiences and …

After refelecting on this thread … Especially looking at the difference between the “dead” and the concept of life everlasting …

I can see some major differences between the non apostolic christians [primarily protestant - especially evengelical] and the apostolic christians [primarily catholic and orthodox].

One major factor is the difference in how we concieve of the “Communion of Saints” … is rooted in how we see the origins of our faith …

IMHO, catholics foundationally begin from that “Communion of Saints” … it is not “Me and Jesus” but “Us and Jesus” like that book “Here Comes Everybody” … we do not start from “Jesus is my personal Lord and Savior” … let me just say that Jesus is our personal Lord and Savior, we do not discount that, it is vitaly important to have a relationship with Christ]. The catholic begins their faith journey from the Community … the Church, we are fundamentally connected through time from the community that accepts us through Baptism today and outside of and through time with the first Christians [Peter and the Apostles, the Early Chruch] … it is into that community we are welcomed - a community founded by, in and through Christ Jesus …

We recognize this in the Mass, a communal celebration that unites us and brings us face to face with the Body of Christ in the Bread recieved in the Upper Room and standing with John at the foot of the Cross on Calvary. Not just symbolically, not as a pure reflection on a past event … but in a real way - made present at that once in a lifetime event … called anamnesis [with a particular understanding that is more then just “to remember”]

See a discussion of anamnesis here: usccb.org/liturgy/godsmercy.shtml
Of particular interest is this paragraph
. 3. The central action of Christian worship, the Eucharistic celebration, is likewise linked historically with Jewish ritual. The term for Church, ecclesia, like the original sense of the word synagogue, is an equivalent for the Hebrew keneset or kenessiyah (assembly). The Christian understanding of ecclesia is based on the biblical understanding of qahal as the formal “gathering” of the people of God. The Christian ordo (order of worship) is an exact rendering of the earliest rabbinic idea of prayer, called a seder, that is, an “order” of service. Moreover, the Christian ordo takes its form and structure from the Jewish seder: the Liturgy of the Word, with its alternating biblical readings, doxologies, and blessings; and the liturgical form of the Eucharist, rooted in Jewish meal liturgy, with its blessings over bread and wine. Theologically, the Christian concept of anamnesis coincides with the Jewish understanding of zikkaron (memorial reenactment). Applied to the Passover celebration, zikkaron refers to the fact that God’s saving deed is not only recalled but actually relived through the ritual meal. The synoptic gospels present Jesus as instituting the Eucharist during a Passover seder celebrated with his followers, giving to it a new and distinctly Christian “memory.”
While our Protestant brethren come to “Jesus” as a more personal, individual act of conversion … they do not necessarily acknowledge the faith community present in this time, let alone the faith community that has existed from Jesus until the present time … One can make an "altar call’ and recite the sinners prayer and be ‘saved’ … whether they have ever committed to a “Community” before or after the conversion experience is of no consequence. Individual bible study and interpretation is all that is required, even baptism for some is viewed as merely symbolic and not required. WHen the present “Commnion” of believers hold little real significance - the Saints from the 1st, 2nd or 14th centuries are of no importance. Now I recognize that the Church COmmunity to which a protestant may belong is very important to them. They share a mission, a Christian focused community, and one that can nourish their life in Christ … somehting I do not discount. What relationship do they have with the past …?

I work with RCIA, one of the common comments I get from people is how wonderfully different funerals are in the Church. Does that mean catholics are less saddened by death? No. I believe the difference is in recognizing - even in our grief - that though departed from this life - they live in Christ - that is the Truth upon which our faith is founded - that those who die in Christ have eternal life.

That us why St’s days are celebrated on or near their the date of thier death … we are celebrating a life lived for Christ …

Pax Christe
 
After refelecting on this thread … Especially looking at the difference between the “dead” and the concept of life everlasting …
I’m glad you worded your sentence this way, since I think those two options are the only options available to people. I see the Bible describing people as either being “dead” or having “life everlasting.” When do Catholics stop being “dead”? I hear of Baptism being refered to as a “birth” but is that when a Catholic stops being dead in their sins? If they are not dead, then they must have “life everlasting,” since spiritual life is described in the Bible as “everlasting.” At least that’s the way I see it. Is there a word that Catholics would use for that “fuzzy area” between being “dead” in sins and having “life eternal.”
 
I’m glad you worded your sentence this way, since I think those two options are the only options available to people. I see the Bible describing people as either being “dead” or having “life everlasting.” When do Catholics stop being “dead”? I hear of Baptism being refered to as a “birth” but is that when a Catholic stops being dead in their sins? If they are not dead, then they must have “life everlasting,” since spiritual life is described in the Bible as “everlasting.” At least that’s the way I see it. Is there a word that Catholics would use for that “fuzzy area” between being “dead” in sins and having “life eternal.”
Dying to sin is somehting we must do daily … our life everlasting depends upon our perserverance in a faith that is not dead … we can choose good over evil, we can choose Christ … but we can also depart from Him, choose to leave after once confessing our Lord [Judas did]

So Catholics would not subscribe to the “Once Saved Always Saved” theology …

St Paul said in 1 Cor 9:
24 Do you not know that the runners in the stadium all run in the race, but only one wins the prize? Run so as to win. 25 Every athlete exercises discipline in every way. They do it to win a perishable crown, but we an imperishable one. 26 Thus I do not run aimlessly; I do not fight as if I were shadowboxing. 27 No, I drive my body and train it, for fear that, after having preached to others, I myself should be disqualified.
Paul believed that he could preach the Gospel, bringing people to Christ and Salvation … and still fail to achieve that Salvation if he succombed to sin …

Here in Hebrews Chapter 12 in addition to another reference to “running a race” we have:
12 So strengthen your drooping hands and your weak knees. 13 Make straight paths for your feet, that what is lame may not be dislocated but healed. 14 Strive for peace with everyone, and for that holiness without which no one will see the Lord.
and here
25 See that you do not reject the one who speaks. For if they did not escape when they refused the one who warned them on earth, how much more in our case if we turn away from the one who warns from heaven. 26 His voice shook the earth at that time, but now he has promised, “I will once more shake not only earth but heaven.” 27 That phrase, “once more,” points to (the) removal of shaken, created things, so that what is unshaken may remain. 28
Therefore, we who are receiving the unshakable kingdom should have gratitude, with which we should offer worship pleasing to God in reverence and awe. 29 For our God is a consuming fire.
 
I know that’s what he is saying. But if he really wanted to comfort them, why didn’t he tell them they could talk to those in heaven if they wanted?

Uh, witness things?

Well, sure. But don’t all children of God have the Spirit living in them? And don’t they all suffer?
Here’s a question. It says in Galations 2 that Peter, who you say is the first pope, sinned. Paul says he “was clearly in the wrong” and other Jews “joined him in his hypocrisy”. Now, if Peter had fallen over dead immediately after this, without repenting, where would he have gone? Heaven? Purgatory? I’m just curious to see what you think.

I think I’ll save that for another thread.

I know our sin is heartbreaking and offensive to God.

Of course I wouldn’t make light of it. But I think that is why God’s grace is so unbelievably amazing. That if we just believe, we are justified; that if we confess, we are saved.
Of course God likes humility more than pride(Proverbs 3:34). But I think I should approach God not pridefully, but humble that He, not I, has saved me, confident in his grace (Hebrews 4:16).

Well, yeah. If you sin deliberately then you are rejecting God’s grace. If you refuse salvation after learning about it, then there really is nothing left to save you. Jesus even said some would fall away after hearing the word(Mark 4). I believe if a person truly accepts salvation and doesn’t turn away, then they can trust in God to save them, even though they still live imperfect lives on earth.

Well, we should always try to live more like Christ. Even though Jesus died for our sins, we should obviously try not to sin.

That is not talking about praying to people, but for people. Of course we should pray for everyone.

I know we should pray for each other. It is just asking those in heaven to pray for us that I find odd.

If God is so upset by sin, the answer is easy - He should have designed us in such a fashion that one of the results of becoming a Christian would be impeccability. If He can do that for one person, He can do it for billions. He did not - & He lets us be tempted into the bargain. So either sin is no big deal after all, or it is a fiction, or it is a bad name for perfectly unproblematic behaviour, or it is a name still in use for what is no sin at all; or a combination of the preceding.​

If Christians are not saintly - it is no fault of ours. We, after all, neither designed human nature, nor created ourselves, nor asked to be born, nor decided how “salvation” was to be worked out. So we cannot be blamed for being what we are 🙂
 
With that logic, why should I ask friends or family to pray for me? Why not just “cut out the middle man” since God hears me anyway?
Because unlike with dead people, you can talk to living people, communicate something to them that you want prayer for, and get a response assuring you that this will happen. You can’t do that with dead people.
These so-called “dead” people aren’t dead, either. They are alive in Christ! The fact that they are closer to God makes them perfect people to ask to pray.
They are absent from the body and present with the Lord. That means they aren’t here anymore. Furthermore, just because a person goes on to be with God does not mean they become omnipresent or omniscient. I really can’t stress this enough- dead people do not take on any deity-like qualities. If dead people are capable of occupying the realm of the living in order to see and hear things (which I’m not sure they can), they can be at most in one place at one time. Again, dead people do not become all-seeing and all-knowing. They always remain finite and limited to being in one place at one time. As a result, your prayers to Saint Peter come across as a little bit silly because odds are very low that he is hanging around in your particular Catholic church in order to hear your prayer. If he is, though, you’d better make sure it’s important because his presence there takes him away from people on the other side of the world who might have something more important to say. If you really think Saint Peter is capable of being everywhere at once and hearing everything, there is something very wrong with your conception of dead people. They don’t become gods.
The Church is a body of believers (including those who are already in Heaven), not just a bunch of separate individuals doing their own individual things with God.
However, it’s only the living ones that I am able to communicate with and ascertain that they have heard me and will indeed pray for me. If you pray to Saint Peter, you have no way of knowing whether he heard you or if he was somewhere in Rome listening to someone else’s prayer at a fancier cathedral. You don’t even know for sure if Saint Peter ever hears your prayers, because you won’t ever get a response from him. Unless you use a Ouija board to get him to talk to you or something like that. Of course, you have better odds of talking to a demon than an apostle if you do that.
Those “dead” people love you and want to pray with you and for you.
But how can they hear a request unless they are able to be present in the same room as you and hear you? Surely you don’t think dead people can read thoughts from afar. Again, they aren’t deities- they’re dead people. There is no shortage of living people to talk to. They are no more omnipresent than a dead person, but at least you can know that they are present with you at a particular place and time. It’s not like you have to pray to dead people, and it’s certainly a less certain mode of communication when compared to talking to a living person. If you ask me, the smart money is on the living, not the dead. Have the living pray for you.
Even more perfectly than people alive on earth, since they are no longer inhibited by worldly distractions. All you have to do is ask them. 🙂
Riiiigggghhht, their only possible distraction is the ability to worship God in His immediate presence at all times. I don’t see what would possible cause someone to want to stay there instead of leaving God’s immediate presence and spending all their time traveling from place to place on the Earth so they can hear people’s prayers and deliver them to God- when God already hears those prayers and knows them before you even say them! And you don’t even know for sure that dead people are able to do this in the first place. God has heavenly messengers, and they are called angels. Do you ever pray to angels? After all, you know for sure that they are present and active on this earth, and you can’t say the same for dead people. They are gone. They are absent from their bodies- this is what the Bible tells us. Some people feel that they are somehow closer to that dead person when they visit their grave, though. But do you really think their soul hangs around the graveyard, or is that just a feeling people get when they have a tangible reminder of the person? I’d say it’s just a feeling, while in reality the person’s soul is G-O-N-E Gone from that place and literally not present to see or hear anything that’s being said about them or (ostensibly) to them. When you talk to a gravestone, you’re talking to nothing but a gravestone.

I totally understand the feeling you get when you visit a grave and feel like you can say something that the dead person might hear, but I also recognize it as just a feeling and not a reality. Their soul is gone. It doesn’t come out at night and fly around like some sort of Egyptian ka. And it’s certainly not omniscient or omnipresent, and that has got to be the only way that all those saints could possibly hear and respond to all the prayer requests they get. Like a person’s gravestone, your little idol or fetish or whatever you call it is merely a tangible reminder of the person that causes a feeling of closeness. It doesn’t actually bring the person’s soul closer, though, and it really is just a feeling- the person most likely can’t hear you.

On the other hand…there’s tons of living people who would be glad to pray for you! So ask one of them. Or five or ten; whatever you want. You know they can hear you, and you can know that they are praying for you. They’ll tell you.
 
…On the other hand…there’s tons of living people who would be glad to pray for you! So ask one of them. Or five or ten; whatever you want. You know they can hear you, and you can know that they are praying for you. They’ll tell you.
A very short reply to a very long (and good!) post:
THANK YOU! :tiphat:

This is a question that I have thought a lot about, and didn’t know what to do with. Your post was very useful!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top