That’s not always true. Remember that evangelicals have a very pragmatic approach to the Church. They tend to see church primarily as a means of saving souls. “Sheep-stealing” consists of luring away from other churches people who are truly saved (and alas, not all evangelicals see the evil even of this). If a person does not have a living relationship with Christ, then they are not a “sheep” and can’t be “stolen.” From the evangelical point of view, what matters is that the person be brought into a relationship with Christ, and whatever church can do that is the right church for that person.
Most evangelicals today do not think that Catholicism is simply un-Christian, but most of them do think that there are a distressingly large number of self-identified Catholics who are not real Christians. And they think that these “nominal Christians” are fair game. From their perspective, a “hands-off” policy would put boundary claims above immortal souls.
A college friend of mine who became a Christian Church pastor put it best. He had been on a summer trip to Chile, and I made a sarcastic remark about his having gone to convert the “papists” (i.e., I was implicitly accusing him of being anti-Catholic). He responded (I’m paraphrasing since the conversation took place a long time ago), “I’d be quite happy if the Catholic Church would convert them–but someone needs to.”
This, I think, sums up the evangelical–as opposed to fundamentalist–attitude to evangelizing Catholics.
On the other hand, Billy Graham adopted the policy–which made him anathema to fundamentalists–of sending Catholics back into their parish churches after they had made a “decision for Christ” in his crusades. This is one of the most truly ecumenical acts of the 20th century, IMHO.
In Christ,
Edwin
I think there is a lot of truth in what you said.
I go on mission trips with non-Catholic Christians and have seen some that think the Catholic Church is nonChristian, and some who believe there are Christians in the Catholic Church.
There are several reasons I go.
First, there is the opportunity to serve others.
There is also the opportunity to share the Gospel.
There is also the opportunity when colaboring with nonCatholic Christians to tear down some of the myths or false witness that circulates in some circles. However imperfectly I live and share my faith, seeing a Catholic wanting others to know Jesus Christ and what He accomplished for us, does work in tearing down misperceptions.
I am also grateful for my Protestant brothers and sisters in Christ.
They encouraged and taught me by example to share my faith.
They challenged me and taught me by example to take my faith more seriously. How I spend Sundays changed significantly after hearing a Protestant sermon on honoring the Sabbath.
They challenged me, which led me to embrace the Catholic faith so much more deeply and sincerely.
Even when we disagree, while some have cut off friendship as I became more Catholic, others are always there to encourage regardless of disagreements.
I respect that when we disagree, they often are able to articulate and defend what they believe, both in their own words, and with Scripture references. Ironically, it is often easier to have a thoughful discussion about Catholic theology with a Protestant friend or aquaintance than with the majority of Catholics I meet, as they generally seem more familiar with our Scripture than we often are. Then again, some of the renewal within the Catholic Church has been significantly influenced by converts from Protestant denominations, teaching us the depth of our Book.
May God continue to bless you,
Michael