Some churches adopt that as a deliberate policy. Edwin Hatch, best remembered today as the main author of the Hatch-Redpath concordance to the Septuagint, once said something like that in a sermon. Taking as his text Gal 6:15, “In Christ Jesus neither circumcision availeth anything, nor uncircumcision, but a new creature”, Hatch preached a sermon in 1876 that was later published under the title, “The Place of Controversy in Christian Life” (link below). I suspect that in this paragraph he may have given away more than he intended to about the aims and motivation of the Broad Church faction within the Church of England.I find it very surprising that many do not consider or even know the theology of the church they attend. Some of the non-denoms can be very vague.
This is protestant favorite that catches and holds the haughty.I wouldn’t want to just show up and hide in the back one day a week.
For a Baptist to relocate to a Lutheran church would be a monumental step, indeed. The differences in worship alone are beyond significant. The views of the sacraments are diametrically opposite.And then maybe a Baptist relocates to the Lutheran church, or a Presbyterian tries out the Methodists, or whatever.
Meaning no disrespect to American evangelicals, I find that sad. The Lutheran mass is so beautiful and inspiring.That is true but seemingly not in all cases. In my community, there are two Lutheran churches who have started up in the last 15 to 20 years whose style and worship procedures have eliminated most liturgical practices and have taken on a more Evangelical flavor.
And the doctrine of the real presence, Confession and Holy Absolution, both corporate and private?Other than for infant baptism, Baptists could feel at home there.
I wouldn’t say that. If worship includes invocation, Holy Absolution, the word (scripture reading), homily, the sacrament, it contains the basics of Lutheran worship. It isn’t Lutheran if they step away from the Confessions.Some stalwarts refer to the newer Lutheran congregations as “not real Lutherans!”
I’m hoping you didn’t find my personal opinion arrogant, if you did I apologize, I meant no offense.This is protestant favorite that catches and holds the haughty.
I’ve found there are individual congregations that think or believe this way (Baptist, Pentecostal, especially the Campbellite Churches of Christ), but it’s usually not across-the-board as a whole for the denomination. In Evangelical Protestantism, denomination is more a general guideline and the individual congregation is in charge of their own doctrine/theology for the most part.And I am really interested to know whether any of these churches regard themselves as “the one true church”, and if so, why?
This is very interesting, and possibly fodder for a new thread — “are there any non-Catholic Christian congregations that belong to more than one denomination simultaneously?”.There are a couple churches near me that have dual membership in the SBC and another denomination, for example (like United Church of Christ).
I don’t know. I’m just giving an anecdote from my town.For a Baptist to relocate to a Lutheran church would be a monumental step, indeed. The differences in worship alone are beyond significant. The views of the sacraments are diametrically opposite.
In some ways, there is a more significant divide between liturgical/ sacramental non-Catholic traditions and other Protestant traditions than there is between the former and Catholicism.
As someone who has spent the majority of my life worshiping in Southern Baptist Churches I find that shocking. In my area if a SBC said they were part of another denomination they would be removed from the local association and would lose the ability to vote and get resources from the state and national convention.The Southern Baptist Convention offers their member congregations the most leeway, so you find a lot of those. There are a couple churches near me that have dual membership in the SBC and another denomination, for example (like United Church of Christ).