Why do protestants name their churches after Saints?

  • Thread starter Thread starter flatlanderjenn
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
It was a pun. You guys are too tight.

peace
Hmmm. A pun. Lemme see now…Duchene/Duchesne… Du-chen…Du ches ne. D u c h e n e.

Nope. Loose as I get, I can’t see it. Where is it?

Come to think of it, did you put 2 r’s in Gasparri?

GKC
 
Oh.

Reminds me of an exchange I had on a board I can’t recall. The topic devolved into whether a Roman Catholic could write science fiction (don’t ask). I got involved with (apparently) an odd woman who maintained that it was impossible for a faithful RC to do so. I ran my list of great SF writers who were RC, and specific works. Was met by surreal responses. Plowed on, anyway.

Never guessed it was a put-on, until the author revealed it.

But, all the same, the author knew little of science fiction.

What a minute. Won’t this cause distress to geraldffff?

GKC
Saying, “I was joking” is a way of saying “Uncle.” That’s as close as some people will ever get to saying: “Thank you GKC, I learned a lot about SF writing from you.”
 
Oh.

Reminds me of an exchange I had on a board I can’t recall. The topic devolved into whether a Roman Catholic could write science fiction (don’t ask). I got involved with (apparently) an odd woman who maintained that it was impossible for a faithful RC to do so. I ran my list of great SF writers who were RC, and specific works. Was met by surreal responses. Plowed on, anyway.

Never guessed it was a put-on, until the author revealed it.

But, all the same, the author knew little of science fiction.

What a minute. Won’t this cause distress to geraldffff?

GKC
Don’t worry about geraldfff. I think he is on our team.

Think about Edwin. He took the opportunity to rail against me, not that was anything unusual; but, this was his worst yet. But, I know he doesn’t mean any harm. I’m like the most recalcitrant student in his class. He gave me another D-.

peace

PS there are two r’s in Gasparri.
 
Saying, “I was joking” is a way of saying “Uncle.” That’s as close as some people will ever get to saying: “Thank you GKC, I learned a lot about SF writing from you.”
I hope I serve a modest purpose.

GKC
 
Saying, “I was joking” is a way of saying “Uncle.” That’s as close as some people will ever get to saying: “Thank you GKC, I learned a lot about SF writing from you.”
Or it is another way of saying, I was joking.
 
Don’t worry about geraldfff. I think he is on our team.

Think about Edwin. He took the opportunity to rail against me, not that was anything unusual; but, this was his worst yet. But, I know he doesn’t mean any harm. I’m like the most recalcitrant student in his class. He gave me another D-.

peace

PS there are two r’s in Gasparri.
I know. I couldn’t remember if you did.

I think Edwin is an honorable man, who expects and assumes honor in others. Unless there is reason to doubt it. I appreciate his words. On its face, I’d give your performance a D-, myself. As serious exchange, or as persiflage.

Hmmm. GF. G F. Could be on your team, yes.

GKC
 
All this mudslinging I almost forgot that we are on a CHRISTIAN forum and not a political one.

Let’s get back on topic how 'bout? 🙂
 
All this mudslinging I almost forgot that we are on a CHRISTIAN forum and not a political one.

Let’s get back on topic how 'bout? 🙂
We’ve been off this thread for ages. I thought you appreciated a little fireworks, Singinbeauty.

You bring us back, if you don’t mind.

peace
 
Hmmm. A pun. Lemme see now…Duchene/Duchesne… Du-chen…Du ches ne. D u c h e n e.

Nope. Loose as I get, I can’t see it. Where is it?

Come to think of it, did you put 2 r’s in Gasparri?

GKC
Humor is poor when you have to explain a pun.
Quote
Yeah, I am hard to talk to. It has to do with English being a second laguage (sic).
Unquote

English, and second LAGUAGE. You don’t get it.
I guess that is why ‘pun’ is the lowest form of humor.

It seems to be a mutual admiration society, you and Edwin.

His last post was a vicious, venomous attack on me and this from an ‘honorable’ man. Right!

Usually, I don’t let him away with his vicious tongue. Ad hominem arguments are part of his life style. Today, I was just being nice.

But now that you keep reminding me of how honorable he is, I’m saying I don’t appreciate anything he said in his post, and he should apologize for it.

peace
 
Humor is poor when you have to explain a pun.
Quote
Yeah, I am hard to talk to. It has to do with English being a second laguage (sic).
Unquote

English, and second LAGUAGE. You don’t get it.
I guess that is why ‘pun’ is the lowest form of humor.

It seems to be a mutual admiration society, you and Edwin.

His last post was a vicious, venomous attack on me and this from an ‘honorable’ man. Right!

Usually, I don’t let him away with his vicious tongue. Ad hominem arguments are part of his life style. Today, I was just being nice.

But now that you keep reminding me of how honorable he is, I’m saying I don’t appreciate anything he said in his post, and he should apologize for it.

peace
Duchene. Laguage. Pun. Nope. Nothing there. Duchene was far ahead of my typo. Was it a pun, even back then?

Edwin took you at face value. And assessed you accordingly. If you are offended about being taken at face value henceforth, it is possible you needn’t be.

GKC
 
Duchene. Laguage. Pun. Nope. Nothing there. Duchene was far ahead of my typo. Was it a pun, even back then?

Edwin took you at face value. And assessed you accordingly. If you are offended about being taken at face value henceforth, it is possible you needn’t be.

GKC
Duchesne has nothing to do with the pun, so forget it.

Face value? You know nothing about me, nor does Edwin.

What kind of sentence is that: “If you are offended about being taken at face value, henceforth it is possible that you needn’t be”.

What does that mean?

Edwin’s post was unacceptable, but that is for him to determine.

peace
 
Duchesne has nothing to do with the pun, so forget it.

Face value? You know nothing about me, nor does Edwin.

What kind of sentence is that: “If you are offended about being taken at face value, henceforth it is possible that you needn’t be”.

What does that mean?

Edwin’s post was unacceptable, but that is for him to determine.

peace
I assume Edwin does know nothing of you. So he judged you by your performance, as anyone would. If it was, as you state, a charade (see what that sort of thing gets you?), then you were functioning as a species of troll. I was wondering how anyone could be so ill-informed. Now I wonder how ill-informed you might be. And there is no way to tell.

If you poison the well, no one can tell when you are in earnest.

GKC
 
I assume Edwin does know nothing of you. So he judged you by your performance, as anyone would. If it was, as you state, a charade (see what that sort of thing gets you?), then you were functioning as a species of troll. I was wondering how anyone could be so ill-informed. Now I wonder how ill-informed you might be. And there is no way to tell.

If you poison the well, no one can tell when you are in earnest.

GKC
Ill-informed? Really? Who is poisoning the well now?

Enough of the insults!

maranatha
 
Ill-informed? Really? Who is poisoning the well now?

Enough of the insults!

maranatha
It’s not an insult. It’s the simple truth. I have no way of knowing what, if anything, you actually know about Anglicanism, after 10-12 pages of what you say was mainly joking posts. As long as I thought you were being straight forward, I could gauge how well/ill-informed you were. Now I have no way of knowing.

GKC
 
It’s not an insult. It’s the simple truth. I have no way of knowing what, if anything, you actually know about Anglicanism, after 10-12 pages of what you say was mainly joking posts. As long as I thought you were being straight forward, I could gauge how well/ill-informed you were. Now I have no way of knowing.

GKC
I know a great deal of Anglicanism. I also know a great deal about the issue of Anglican Orders, but you wanted to make it a pop quizz, which I daresay most Anglicans could not answer, and maybe even Edwin couldn’t answer.

It was an insult to pose such nonesense. In light of that, what I did was turn the tables on you. I despise snobbery. I don’t have to prove to you, or to anyone else what is my knowledge of “Apostolicae Curae”, its history and background.

The subject and topic is over as far as I am concerned.

peace
 
I know a great deal of Anglicanism. I also know a great deal about the issue of Anglican Orders, but you wanted to make it a pop quizz, which I daresay most Anglicans could not answer, and maybe even Edwin couldn’t answer.

It was an insult to pose such nonesense. In light of that, what I did was turn the tables on you. I despise snobbery. I don’t have to prove to you, or to anyone else what is my knowledge of “Apostolicae Curae”, its history and background.

The subject and topic is over as far as I am concerned.

peace
You don’t have to guess. Edwin couldn’t answer them, I’m almost certain. I could because the subject is one of my hobbies. Like Chesterton, and WWII history (certain topics therein), and about 12-15 other areas that I collect books in. Lots of books. It makes me what you can call informed. And it makes for a deeper historical conversation. You know, being deep in history, and all that.

What you may or may not know about Anglicanism will remain a mystery. Unless you really want to talk, some day.

Pax.

GKC
 
Since we are all worshipping the same God and are brothers and sisters in Christ why would it offend you for a church to choose a fellow christian they hold in high esteem to be the namesake for the building they worship the Almighty in?
because i take my faith seriously. it’s not about feelings or being nice. it’s about the truth and the responsibility and humility that comes with knowing the truth.

for them to use a seriously holy catholic saint to name their parish trivializes the catholic faith.
 
because i take my faith seriously. it’s not about feelings or being nice. it’s about the truth and the responsibility and humility that comes with knowing the truth.

for them to use a seriously holy catholic saint to name their parish trivializes the catholic faith.
How?
 
st. francis believed in the truth of gospel so seriously that he lead a radical life of poverty, mortification of the flesh–purity–and humility.

objectively, none of these qualities are a part of the episcopalianism but are in a large part diametrically opposed to ethos of this sect.

look no further than the demonic acts of its founder, king henry the 8th.
 
because i take my faith seriously. it’s not about feelings or being nice. it’s about the truth and the responsibility and humility that comes with knowing the truth.

for them to use a seriously holy catholic saint to name their parish trivializes the catholic faith.
Are you serious? If the Baptists down the street decided to name their church after a saint, how in the world does it trivialize either the Catholic Church or the saint. The Catholic Saints are not the personal, private property of the Church, licensed only for use by card-carrying Catholics! Their message is the Gospel message of Jesus Christ. Their lives are examples to the entire world – not just the Christian world, but the whole world, from here to China and back.

Don’t be stingy. We are to be a light to the world. If some of our light has shed a ray of truth of people who do not yet understand the whole package, why gripe at them for what they DO appreciate and understand.

If a Catholic Saint has done something to merit the admiration of other Christians, to the extent that they name a church after him, then we should rejoice.

OTOH, it is certain that in England, where the Reformation left a lot of churches named after Saints quite intact, there was no felt need to change the name after the break with Rome. When you have all this fantastic real estate, and the name of your patron is carved in stone all over the building, you think twice before you mess it up. Unless you are Cromwell, of course.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top