Why do Protestants object to evolutionary ideas more than Catholics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter PathDiagnosis
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
P

PathDiagnosis

Guest
Could it be because Protestants believe in Sola Scriptura?
Many people also do not understand the word “evolution” much last DNA/central dogma of molecular biology, natural selection etc.
 
I believe that Sola Scripture is part of the problem, but there is other problems as well. One of the main problems being (related to SS) is a literalist interpretation of the Bible as opposed to a literal interpretation. Example being “raining cats and dogs” from a literalist perspective would mean cats and dogs were falling from the sky, while the literal interpretation is that it is raining hard outside.

Another problem is that many protestants seem to hold on more tightly to historical beliefs because they are less adaptable to new information when compared to the Catholic Church. The Catholic Church has a set system in which to evaluate new information and integrate it into the beliefs of the faithful while protestants tend to distrust changes (when they are fundumentalists). They also don’t have an infallible guide outside of scripture to trust, thus any new scientific discovery has a hard time braking into protestant thought.
 
I once had a discussion (on-line) with a Bible-literalist protestant, who stated that everything had to have an origin of about the same time as Adam. Reason? Because Death entered the world because of Adam, so if anything existed 65 million years ago, it would have still be alive at the time of Adam. Since his believe in Sola Scriptura and literalism was so pronounced he had to blind himself to reason & science to mainatin those beliefs. Logical, really, but somewhat flawed.

And he had the cheek to mock Catholics for believing in the literalism of the Real Presence!
 
Another problem is seeing the Bible as a book. It is NOT a book, but rather a library of books assembled into one tome by the early church. If you go into the Poetry section and condemn the whole library as being unscientific then that is your error, not the libraries.
 
The title of this post makes some assumptions that I’m not sure are accurate.

It might be more accurate to state that Fundamentalists and Bible Christians deny evolution more. If these are lumped in with mainstream Protestantism, it will certainly inlate the numbers. But most of my Evangelical, Baptist and non-denominational friends here in the deep south would just as soon distance themselves from mainstream Protestant Churches and their doctrines as they would from the Catholic Church and it’s doctrines. Non-denom’s and Bible literalists, even Southern Baptists to a certain extent, see themselves as far different from both.

Methodist, Episcopalians, and Lutherans are probably closer to Catholics on creation doctrines than we think. The one thing I learned about non-Catholic religions here in the deep south is not to lump them all in together. Mainstream denominational Protestantism is very different from Fundamentalist “Jesus and me” Bible literalism

-Tim-
 
The title of this post makes some assumptions that I’m not sure are accurate.

It might be more accurate to state that Fundamentalists and Bible Christians deny evolution more. If these are lumped in with mainstream Protestantism, it will certainly inlate the numbers. But most of my Evangelical, Baptist and non-denominational friends here in the deep south would just as soon distance themselves from mainstream Protestant Churches and their doctrines as they would from the Catholic Church and it’s doctrines. Non-denom’s and Bible literalists, even Southern Baptists to a certain extent, see themselves as far different from both.

Methodist, Episcopalians, and Lutherans are probably closer to Catholics on creation doctrines than we think. The one thing I learned about non-Catholic religions here in the deep south is not to lump them all in together. Mainstream denominational Protestantism is very different from Fundamentalist “Jesus and me” Bible literalism

-Tim-
I think this is true… the liberal branches of christianity (usually among the protestants) seem to endorse evolution in higher rates than the average Catholic community. At least this is the impression I get where I live, but if you lived in a highly fundamentalist area it might be hard to see that all protestants dont feel the same way.
 
I reject evolution and always have done.

God didn’t create apes and wait for them to turn into man.
 
Because of the Fundamentalist movement in the 1960’s that heavily attacked evolution theory and stresed the “historical” and “scientific” validity of the Bible (which is somewhat obsurd, since the written tradition is based on oral traditions, and oral tradition doesn’t lay claim to exact social setting and is usually based off of the spiritual reality of those experiencing an event that reveals God’s nature.)
 
I reject evolution and always have done.

God didn’t create apes and wait for them to turn into man.
Afraid so… What makes us in the image and likeness to God is our capability of intellect, creativity and metaphysical insight. However, the origins of all are as humble as the dust of the Earth, whether you follow the creation myth of Genesis or scientific theory. I do know that modernday primates share 98% or our DNA, have similar anatomic structures in their ears, hands, feet, body structure and a common ancestor that is a homo-sapien. 😛
 
Could it be because Protestants believe in Sola Scriptura?
Many people also do not understand the word “evolution” much last DNA/central dogma of molecular biology, natural selection etc.
I don’t think that has anything to do with it. My father was a strict Catholic and never bought into evolution.
Come to think of it, neither do I.
 
May I remind everyone that Both accepting and not accepting evolution is fully valid according to Catholic teaching? If you want to debate which is right I suggest opening a new thread.
 
I don’t think that has anything to do with it. My father was a strict Catholic and never bought into evolution.
Come to think of it, neither do I.
When someone learns more about science they begin to fall away from fundamentalism and gain an acceptance of evolution. They realize anti-evolution feelings are (no offense, by any means) are created from a lack of understanding on the subject and psuedo-scientific propaganda. During this time I was also leaning towards CAtholicism and was afraid the CC might take a position AGAINST evolution for the sake of “God being creator” or something. However, I saw a video froma fundamentalist fallaway Catholic condemning Pope Benedict the 16th for endorsing evolution. To me, that showed the the CC DID care about truth and intuitive research and not just for popular opinion…
 
Afraid so… What makes us in the image and likeness to God is our capability of intellect, creativity and metaphysical insight. However, the origins of all are as humble as the dust of the Earth, whether you follow the creation myth of Genesis or scientific theory. I do know that modernday primates share 98% or our DNA, have similar anatomic structures in their ears, hands, feet, body structure and a common ancestor that is a homo-sapien. 😛
:banghead:

Creation is not a myth, God created us, is He a myth?

Are you also saying that God is unable to create man so He had to create apes and hope for the best?

How do you know about this 98%? Have you seen it for yourself in your own laboratory or are you putting your total faith in science?

:bible1:
 
Sola Scriptura it is. Sola Scriptura still doens’t make sense to me.

Thanks.
 
:banghead:

Creation is not a myth, God created us, is He a myth?

Are you also saying that God is unable to create man so He had to create apes and hope for the best?

How do you know about this 98%? Have you seen it for yourself in your own laboratory or are you putting your total faith in science?

:bible1:
What kind of biological education or knowledge do you have? The word “evolution” doesn’t even necessarily mean God created humans specifically from apes. Evolution is a complex term, it is a way of explaining biological phenomenon.

Please try to understand the following terms: DNA, central dogma of molecular biology, natural selection, genetic mutations, introns, exons, natural selection if you want to understand evolution.

Evolution is a VERY broad term (micro, macro, etc).
 
I think this is true… the liberal branches of christianity (usually among the protestants) seem to endorse evolution in higher rates than the average Catholic community. At least this is the impression I get where I live, but if you lived in a highly fundamentalist area it might be hard to see that all protestants dont feel the same way.
Liberal Protestants tend to believe more in evolution than Christianity. We share with fundamentalists more than we do with liberal Protestants. Liberalism, as Newman says, is the anti-Dogmatic principle. It accepts no doctrine as settled truth. Fundamentalists such as Machem are not to be dismissed along with the mere Bible-pounders.
 
:banghead:

Creation is not a myth, God created us, is He a myth?

Are you also saying that God is unable to create man so He had to create apes and hope for the best?

How do you know about this 98%? Have you seen it for yourself in your own laboratory or are you putting your total faith in science?

:bible1:
As a form of literature, “myth” doesn’t mean “something once believed to be true but is now known to be false.” It’s a story that orients us in concepts beyond our understanding. There are two creation myths in Genesis Chapters 1-2:4 and 2:5-3:24. You can see that these are two distinct and seperate creation accounts. Both are brilliantly written as well. The organizing structure of the first is a work-week. We know the story isn’t contemporary with the account because it’s structured into a culture that has a 7-day week. What are the heavens and the earth? God’s works. What are the sun, moon and stars? Objects of his creation, not gods. What is man? His image and likeness, the heralds of the earth.

It’s common knowledge that chimpanzees share 98% of our DNA, I’m sure you could find it in any text book, peer-review journal or science article on the issue.

I’m not saying God doesn’t know what he’s doing. This great big show on earth is cmplex and extrordinary, if I were God, I would surely equipp my creation with natural selection by means random mutation to ensure they adapt to an ever-changing world or change into something else if they die out. Remember, God is all-knowing and his understanding is far greater than ours. It might not be as simple as “he spun a monkey and hoped for us.” 😛
What kind of biological education or knowledge do you have? The word “evolution” doesn’t even necessarily mean God created humans specifically from apes. Evolution is a complex term, it is a way of explaining biological phenomenon.

Please try to understand the following terms: DNA, central dogma of molecular biology, natural selection, genetic mutations, introns, exons, natural selection if you want to understand evolution.

Evolution is a VERY broad term (micro, macro, etc).
He holds a valid point, immediately people assume “human evolution” when they think of evolution. Or the “ape-man cop-out God complex.” 😛

“Evolution” isn’t an alternative to “Creation.” It’s not one or the other as the media and debating poles would give you the illusion of. “Creationism” merely refers to traditional young-earth “non-evolutionist” views. I’m a creationist, I just believe in a God that intelligently evolves His creation. 👍
 
May I remind everyone that Both accepting and not accepting evolution is fully valid according to Catholic teaching? If you want to debate which is right I suggest opening a new thread.
Excellent idea!
 
How do you know about this 98%? Have you seen it for yourself in your own laboratory or are you putting your total faith in science?
That line of argument will not progress the point you wish to make. We can’t say that someone only knows something if they personal carry out the research themselves. Of course we rely on science. Science also relies on being properly reported. Unfortunately, there are many people out there who try to refute scientific knowledge with false propaganda. There are also many who say that religion and science must be completely separated. It is perfectly possible that evolution happened. It is perfectly possible that evolution happened because that was God’s design.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top