D
DENNYINMI
Guest
Very well written…Catholicwife32
Unfortunately this is untrue and unwise in it’s thought structure. First, this may be the only way some will advance to other than offers from McDonalds or a life of servitude to low paying jobs that will require some sort of subsidy. Secondly, some schools have seen the ‘after 12’ idea of academia and are allowing students to actually graduate from high school with college credits up to an associate degree. 95% of these students are then inspired (and financially ept) to further an education to a bachelor of science degree and further WHILE working…how nice not to have a 300,000 loan to repay, eh?..When I was in school- I graduated in 1974- high school students not destined for college could opt for vocational training in 10th, 11th and 12th grade particularly. Children could take OVT (occupational vocational training) classes in a whole host of different courses from cosmetology to shoe repair, to get them ready for the working world. Further, there other individual classes like typing , bookkeeping, stenography for the young ladies looking for secretarial work.
No need to expand childhood for 2 more years.
That is an EXCELLENT book. I second it!!!Pick up the book "Defenders of the Unborn."
Ah yes, bootstrapping. It’s the Gospel thing to do!~Because “bootstrapping” is the sole idea. Once you learn through real life experience that bootstrapping works in rare situations, one changes their paradigm
Here are the three keys to escaping poverty: graduate high school, get a full time job, wait until 21 to get married and have children. According to the Brookings Institute:The main point is not being addressed. 12 years of public education (no matter how excellent the school district) will not prepare someone for a career to pay bills, rent, healthcare and an eventual family. A career does not mean a Phd, or an “artsy” type of career, it could be welding, or some type of vocation training that extends beyond high school. The wealthy are very aware of this but have the means for beyond what I’m discussing.
Fourteen years of free education will help some of those who finish twelve, but isn’t going to do much for those who have already dropped out. Shouldn’t we really be addressing the failures and problems with the education kids are receiving today? Again, this distinguishes the conservative from the liberal approach: the former favor school choice, the latter are adamantly against it. As I said earlier: the two sides have diametrically opposed views of what will work and what won’t, and those views have nothing to do with anything Catholicism teaches. A Catholic can legitimately hold either position.For heavens sakes, education is a means to the end of the “welfare” programs conservatives are dismissive of.
I believe we can safely assume that we won’t agree that persons need to move beyond a high school diploma into a career, trade, or vocation with assistance if need be…I believe education is the pole we use when teaching to fish, and not for a day…hahaha…As I said earlier: the two sides have diametrically opposed views of what will work and what won’t, and those views have nothing to do with anything Catholicism teaches. A Catholic can legitimately hold either position.
Most people fall into long term poverty because of poor personal choices. Having said that, I recognize that there are also a number of people who are poor through no fault of their own. The latter deserve assistance; the former, not so much.But other than this…in what ways does conservative party ideals move persons out of hardships, but most importantly, how is it accomplished? In other words, not what they don’t need…but what do they need and how???
There is a real problem with people borrowing too much for higher education. Little excuse to borrow that kind of money. My nephew just graduated at Akron, the tuition and fees are 19k/ year but they gave him a decent discount, worked during his last two years, and doesn’t owe nearly that.…how nice not to have a 300,000 loan to repay, eh?..
Transitions into and out of poverty often happen after major events such as marriage, divorce, or changes in income. They are also associated with economic factors, such as unemployment rates or wages.Most people fall into long term poverty because of poor personal choices. Having said that, I recognize that there are also a number of people who are poor through no fault of their own. The latter deserve assistance; the former, not so much.
When you let me tell you what you believe I’ll let you tell me what I believe. Until then most people should at least acknowledge that the way liberals describe conservatives is nothing like the way they understand themselves.You really have NO idea how the wheels of conservatism turn, do you
I guess the simple test of this position is to ask whether people in general are better off financially today than they were a year and a half ago. By virtually all indicators, they are.Trickle down economics for example has not proven to be your friend unless you’re at the top. Own it. Wages stagger, but the wealthy are wealthier.
I am not, in fact, costs keep going up and there is no increase in my wages.I guess the simple test of this position is to ask whether people in general are better off financially today than they were a year and a half ago. By virtually all indicators, they are.
They say give a man a fish vs teaching him to fish…you know the rest. However moving a person out of poverty requires giving on some level. The goal of any individual and community is safety, education, and life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. There are persons that need that initial 'help up"…Today with the level of help needed if one subscribes to the Catholic teaching of subsidiarity it may not be feasible for charities to do ALL of the work…we have safety nets within our country for reason, socialism (the word is almost always used out of context from it’s intended definition) be damned. We ARE a social people, we were made that way. I pool resources with association fees in a condo, local taxes for snow removal and schools, car insurance where my neighbor can cause a 10 car pile up and my rates don’t go up…his does, medical insurance so I don’t loose my shirt if I have a catastrophe…Good grief.Socialism aka progressives believe that the government is the answer to all problems. Socialism aka progressives want to take the initiative to good out of the hands of conservatives with the lie that the “state” has all the answers. I know enough about how government bureaucracies work. Give the power of health care, protection, energy, transportation into the hands of a socialist government is to give power to a corrupt sinking ship.