Why do we fear others' beliefs so much?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mystical_Seeker
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
A good book I read on the subkect is;

“The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion”
by Jonathan Haidt.

Another good book on the subject is “A New Earth: Awakening to Your Life’s Purpose,” by Echart Tolle.

Some people will have problems with me posting this, but the author is right on and actually repeats the same as Archbishop Fulton Sheen wrote years ago, only it’s more up to date.

Jim
 
I think it’s important to distinguish what is “fear” and what it “prudence”.

And what is “syncretism”.

Avoiding the teachings, rituals and practices of another religion isn’t always out of fear, it may be out of prudence. We do pick up things from people we hang out with, from things we hear etc. We can’t and do not need to avoid all contact with others and differing beliefs, but it may be prudent to refrain from participating in activities that are connected with other faiths.

Hearing how yoga, tantric healing, etc totally revitalized the life of someone we like and respect may indeed lure us to not only the particular body position, but lead us toward openess to other modes of spiritual practice etc etc. And many of those practices ARE efficatious and do lead to spiritual experiences etc…but also lead one away from the practices of the Catholic faith.

There is a difference between “fearing” yoga (since that is the example being used) and avoiding it out of prudence. We know as humans that we have that vulnerability. Refraining from taking part in those things can be an act of humility, obedience, and even an opportunity for spiritual growth by committing on a deeper level to immerse oneself in the practices of the Catholic faith.

Some may be able to do yoga, guided meditations, and attend a Course in Miracles class and still be totally faithful to the Church and be able to pick and choose from those other things only that which is unchallenging to their faith. They may be able to boldly go where no angel dares to tread. I believe there are Saints who have done just that. But not all have that gift, or calling.

And syncretism is very easy to fall into. “Oh, I don’t believe that nonsense…I’m just cherry picking the good stuff, no problem at all” but the practices, music, talk we hear begins to sink in. Hey, we can be faithful to Christ and have some pretty crystals on the windowsill, and take a bath with certain essential oils believed to open the fourth Chakra…because we only use them because they smell nice. And wow, the sound of the singing bowl is so relaxing…

God warns repeatedly in the Old Testament of adopting pratices of pagans, syncretism can be insidious. One doesn’t even realize, or doesn’t believe it is happening. They don’t recognize their own practices and reasoning to have anything to do with syncretism. They believe they are incapable of falling into such.

I say this because I have seen it happen many many times to those around me. “Hey, you know, I never thought I’d like this but I tried it because a friend recommended it to me and it makes SO much sense, and I feel so good after I do it, so I got a few books about it from the library…”

In older times, religion and culture were one and the same. Foods, festivals, practices etc were all part of a whole. These days it seems less that way, and so we think that we can always clearly delineate what is “faith” or religion based, and what is “everything else”, but many of those practices stem from a time and culture where there was no “everything else”, and some things can’t be teased apart into “spiritual” and “not spiritual”.

Some people are very aware of this and make intentional efforts to maintain their culture and this often includes faith practices, because those ARE culture.

It is good to respect the cultures of others. It is good to respect our own culture as well, and one way of doing that can be to stay true to it’s own practices and refrain from those of other cultures.

During Seder the story of the original Passover is shared. This is what we do, and this is why.

When I was growing up, the Polish culture was shared. The Christmas customs were explained, this is what we do, and this is why. No other culture was despised, we simply did what we did.

Same with Catholicism, when I was growing up, it wasn’t our religion, it was our way of life. This is what we do, and this is why. Others have their things, that lead to their own conclusions. But this is what WE do, and this is why.

When I would ask, “but why don’t we do THEIR thing” the answer was “Because we have this beautiful thing that has been passed down to us and we have the responsibility and grace to maintain it, benefit from it and pass it to others”
It does seem to me, however, that within the acceptable scope of Catholic orthodoxy there are those who are more rigid, and those who are more flexible. The more rigid might be labeled traditionalists, and the more flexible might be labeled progressive, although I know the use of such labels is a loaded topic. The more rigid might see, in their estimation, the more flexible edging toward syncretism, and so they sound the alarm. Just how much fear plays into this reaction, I cannot say. It might indeed be prudence, as you say. However, if the more flexible have already considered syncretism and determined that whatever they are doing is acceptable within the limits of our Faith, they are liable to be put off by any admonishment from the more rigid. I think that what Jim says is very true here. We get very attached to our own point of view.

How we approach each other matters as well, I think. If the rigid come at the flexible with a strictly “letter of the law” approach, or limit their argument to “this is how we’ve always done things” (which is never entirely true, as all things change, including cultural and religious practices), the flexible will likely again be put off. The flexible by their very nature will often be on the edge in some ways, and arguments from the edge will not likely hold water with the rigid. It is an impasse. Both sides believe they are right, and then our ego, as Jim says, and sometimes pride, complicate things all the more.
 
It has to do with those who have en ego-identity connection to their religion.

It isn’t spiritual, so much as a group identity connection.

Anything that threatens the group is a threat to the ego and they react offensively.

It’s the same in politics as it is in religion, which is why people are told to not get into discussions on religion or politics.

Jim
I agree completely. The same goes for sports teams.

It is a product of our ancient tribal mentality. There is “us”, and there is “not us”, and “not us” is anywhere between suspicious and hostile.
 
Old post but not closed 🙂

Yesterday, Feast Day for Edith Stein/ St Teresa Benedicta of the Cross

God leads everyone by their own way

“As each person is unique so are their religious experiences; in good logic, approaches to God, then, must enjoy the privilege of singularity. She put her philosopher friend, Roman Ingarden, on guard when she wrote to him: Quite clearly I have no intention to present to you my way as the way. I am deeply convinced that there as many roads leading to Rome as there are human heads and hearts.”

The appeal of truth in Edith Stein…
"
I have always been very far from thinking that the mercy of God is confined by the borders of the visible church. God is truth, whoever searches for the truth searches for God, whether they are aware of it or not".

discalcedcarmel.com/

Blessings ~ in LoveMercyGrace
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top