A
aprilfloyd
Guest
Why do we use english style names for apostles? Is this common or just in English speaking countries?
Language preferences. There is no ‘J’ sound in the Hebrew language. Who would think of calling the first presiding bishop of the church, "Yaakov" (Jacob)?Why do we use english style names for apostles? Is this common or just in English speaking countries?
I’m guessing yes.Why do we use english style names for apostles? Is this common or just in English speaking countries?
We use English transliterations of the Hebrew names. Other countries woould use transliterations into their language. for example my name is Steve, in French my name is pronounced Etienne, in Spanish it’s Esteban. So if you read a bible written in Spanish in Acts Esteban was stoned to death.Why do we use english style names for apostles? Is this common or just in English speaking countries?
IESVS or PAVLVS sounds good to me.Why do we use english style names for apostles? Is this common or just in English speaking countries?
So we can pronounce them?=aprilfloyd;10473738]Why do we use english style names for apostles? Is this common or just in English speaking countries?
eh? surley they can be pronounced in their original language.So we can pronounce them?
Well … I doubt that “English-style” names are used in Ukrainian or any of the other Slavic languages. They use their own version. Just as in French where “James” is rendered Jacques. (I think there may have been an Old French version something like “Gemmes” which would have given rise to the English.) Or in Italian where it’s rendered Giacomo. Or in Portuguese where it’s Tiago. Or in Spanish where it could be Tiago, or Diego, or Iago, or even Jaime.Why do we use english style names for apostles? Is this common or just in English speaking countries?
Thanks for reply.Well … I doubt that “English-style” names are used in Ukrainian or any of the other Slavic languages. They use their own version. Just as in French where “James” is rendered Jacques. (I think there may have been an Old French version something like “Gemmes” which would have given rise to the English.) Or in Italian where it’s rendered Giacomo. Or in Portuguese where it’s Tiago. Or in Spanish where it could be Tiago, or Diego, or Iago, or even Jaime.
Take the word “London” for example, which is rendered in French as “Londres” and in Italian as “Londra” etc. Or “Nice” which came from the Greek “Nikea” and is rendered in Italian as “Nizza” and “Nissa” in Provençale. Or “Moscow” which in Russian is “Moskva” and “Moscou” in French. They’re simply linguistic variants. Nothing more, nothing less.
For my dime, it beats the silliness of enforcing “politically correct” things like Myanmar or Yangon. In English, those words have been rendered “Burma” and “Rangoon” respectively for centuries. Or “Mumbai” which has been rendered “Bombay” in English for centuries. The whole “politically correct” thing is absolutely alien to me. When speaking in English, I do, and will continue to, use the traditional English form for all of them.
That would be Petros and Iacovos (I used to attend 50% Greek Mass parish).They just would look out of place in Greek, probably. Imagine reading Petrus, Andreas, Jacobos…
So you see, a big no no.That would be Petros and Iacovos (I used to attend 50% Greek Mass parish).But I certainly agree. Agios = Sanctus = Holy = Saint
![]()
Um…because we speak English?Why do we use english style names for apostles? Is this common or just in English speaking countries?
Wouldn’t that depend on the case (nominative, accusative) it is used?That would be Petros and Iacovos (I used to attend 50% Greek Mass parish).But I certainly agree. Agios = Sanctus = Holy = Saint
![]()
Certainly!Wouldn’t that depend on the case (nominative, accusative) it is used?