Why does Daniel refuse the King's wine and meat?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ErinGoBragh
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
E

ErinGoBragh

Guest
In Daniel 1, King Nebuchadnezzar has Daniel and some other hebrews “trained” in his court. The servants of the king are supposed to make sure they are properly fed and taken care of. However, Daniel and these hebrews refuse to drink the kings wine and eat his food. Why? This obviously isn’t a doctrinal cliff hanger by any means but I was just reading it today and was wondering why. Any insights would be appreciated.
 
Probably a better thread for the Scripture forum.

The food was unclean according to the Jewish Levitical Law. The meat and wine may have been offered to idols and prepared improperly according to the dietary laws. There was really no way to know exactly what meat it was, from clean or unclean animals.

One example of what was going in is how King Nebuchadnezzar has siezed the holy vessels from the temple, and how Nebuchadnezzar’s son later used the sacred vessels for profane purposes.

King Belshazzar gave a great banquet for a thousand of his nobles, with whom he drank. Under the influence of the wine, he ordered the gold and silver vessels which Nebuchadnezzar, his father, had taken from the temple in Jerusalem, to be brought in so that the king, his nobles, his consorts, and his concubines might drink from them. (Daniel 5:1-2)

This is an example of why Daniel and his comrades were hesitant about consuming anything other than vegetables and water. They were usure where the food came from, if it was used in pagan rituals, who had prepared it, etc. Some of the pagans even ate human flesh, and so anything was possible. They were simply trying to be faithful to the Law of Moses and thereby be faithful to God.

-Tim-
 
Meat, wine and even cooked vegetables may have been sacrificed to the Persian gods, even if the food might have otherwise been kosher.

Rather than face the possibility of accepting foods that would violate their covenant with God, they asked only for raw vegetables and water.

I don’t know whether that would have normally met their nutritional needs with such a diet so I am sure God would have supernaturally provided for any nutritional lack they may have had. (this in light of the saints who lived only on the Eucharist for part of their lives)
 
Probably a better thread for the Scripture forum.
Sorry, i’m still kinda new to this website so i’m not sure which threads go where. However I appreciate your answer and the clarity that it gave me. It never crossed my mind about the preparation of the meat and wine. Very good insights! Thank you and God Bless!
 
I wasn’t aware that they were raw vegetables, as SonCatcher pointed out.

-Tim-
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top