Why does God "kill" in the Bible?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 4HisChurch
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
4

4HisChurch

Guest
What is the proper response to someone who states that in the Bible, God “killed” many people, in violation of His own rules and ethics?

I could reply that life is God’s to give or take away, but I don’t think that would fly with this particular person. If God’s commandment says “do not kill”, why is God portrayed in the Old Testament, especially, as being behind human destruction?

Thank you!
 
The commandment is ‘You shall not murder.’
Also, all lives belong to God, so when He takes life away it could never possibly be murder.
 
What is the proper response to someone who states that in the Bible, God “killed” many people, in violation of His own rules and ethics?

I could reply that life is God’s to give or take away, but I don’t think that would fly with this particular person. If God’s commandment says “do not kill”, why is God portrayed in the Old Testament, especially, as being behind human destruction?

Thank you!
God is not subject to the laws he gave man.

I know, this was one big big thing for me for a long time. I still have a hard time with it some days.
 
The whole problem about why there is evil in the world cannot be answered.
Has the potter no right over the clay, to make out of the same lump one object for special use and another for ordinary use?
(New Revised Standard Version, Ro 9:21, Nashville: Thomas Nelson Publishers, 1989).
O the depth of the riches and wisdom and knowledge of God! How unsearchable are his judgments and how inscrutable his ways!
“For who has known the mind of the Lord?
Or who has been his counselor?”
“Or who has given a gift to him,
to receive a gift in return?”
(New Revised Standard Version, Ro 11:33-35, Nashville: Thomas Nelson Publishers, 1989).
 
Why not?

Why shouldn’t he hold himself to the same rules as he holds humanity? Just because He has authority? Just because He created us?

Well, why can’t we give parents the same kind of authority? Why not give our leaders that same kind of authorty since they are the rulers?

It’s a stupid double standard. It’s too much like someone saying “do as I say not as I do” and holds no credibility.

But then again, it’s like I always say. nobody ever holds themselves to the standarrds of morality and ethical behavior as they expect others to be held to. I guess the same thing is said of God.

It’s very tiresome.

I am so sick of that utter junk that people can excuse themselves from the standards they expect others to be strictly held by.

And when I hear junk like that it’s very disheartening.

And has me seriously considering whether or not I want to be a Catholic anymore or even want to be associated with God.
 
But God came in the flesh to us, and became man. Jesus was obedient to the laws. To death. So, don’t toss it all in the garbage just yet!
Why not?

Why shouldn’t he hold himself to the same rules as he holds humanity? Just because He has authority? Just because He created us?

Well, why can’t we give parents the same kind of authority? Why not give our leaders that same kind of authorty since they are the rulers?

It’s a stupid double standard. It’s too much like someone saying “do as I say not as I do” and holds no credibility.

But then again, it’s like I always say. nobody ever holds themselves to the standarrds of morality and ethical behavior as they expect others to be held to. I guess the same thing is said of God.

It’s very tiresome.

I am so sick of that utter junk that people can excuse themselves from the standards they expect others to be strictly held by.

And when I hear junk like that it’s very disheartening.

And has me seriously considering whether or not I want to be a Catholic anymore or even want to be associated with God.
 
Why not?

Why shouldn’t he hold himself to the same rules as he holds humanity? Just because He has authority? Just because He created us?
For the most part, yes. Our lives belong to him, and he has the full right to take them away as he sees fit. And whenever he does so, it is always good, because God is always good.
Well, why can’t we give parents the same kind of authority?
Because they too are subject to the laws of the state.
Why not give our leaders that same kind of authority since they are the rulers?
Because they are subject not only to the basic laws of the state, international law, and Constitutions, but also to the natural and divine law, even if they don’t believe in it.
It’s a stupid double standard. It’s too much like someone saying “do as I say not as I do” and holds no credibility.
It’s not a double standard, because God is subject to no one. No human being has the right to tell God what he can or cannot do. It’s God who defines the standards of the moral law, not man.
But then again, it’s like I always say. nobody ever holds themselves to the standarrds of morality and ethical behavior as they expect others to be held to. I guess the same thing is said of God.
For God to not hold himself to standards of morality is his right by virtue of his being God and infinite Good. For man not to hold himself to standards of morality given by God is evil. Man is subject to God, and God does not owe man any explanation whatsoever.
It’s very tiresome.
That’s always the case when we question God.
I am so sick of that utter junk that people can excuse themselves from the standards they expect others to be strictly held by.
Those are double standards, and is true for man. Man cannot adhere to double standards and claim that “even God does it”.
And when I hear junk like that it’s very disheartening.
And has me seriously considering whether or not I want to be a Catholic anymore or even want to be associated with God.
Then you need to do some serious thinking about whether you are willing to humble yourself to God’s infinite wisdom, even if we don’t always understand it, or choose your own limited human understanding that we all share. But rejecting God means nothing but sorrow and pain.

I for one will never dare question God’s wisdom, because despite all my education and training, my wisdom is nowhere near a grain compared to God’s. God owns me, and my life is his to dispose of as he sees fit, and I welcome his goodness always.
 
Srarwynd

You wrote:
It’s very tiresome.
I am so sick of that utter junk that people can excuse themselves from the standards they expect others to be strictly held by.
And when I hear junk like that it’s very disheartening.
And has me seriously considering whether or not I want to be a Catholic anymore or even want to be associated with God.
I see you consider some things written here as junk.

People often write from their own difficult experiences and deep thinking.

Many people disagree. Many of us are wrong in good faith. But our thoughts are not junk to us.

It may be healthy for you to consider if you want to be a Catholic from now on. It also may be the honest thing for you to consider if you want to be associated with God. Your decisions may make you as wiser and more mature person.

I wish you well in your reflections.
 
I guess I know what you feel now poster who is doubting…

I readily admit, that I worry I could slip into this type of despair myself, being so new to this.

But, stick it out in prayer for now. Maybe avoid the forums for a while because it can be hard to hear advice (no matter how good it is) when the other person may not really understand where your heart is in this, and why you feel this way.

Don’t worry. Thoughts like this are maybe a blessing. There is a reason why we need to dig deeper into ourselves to really see what it is that is the root of the matter…

I hope that made sense to you. I encourage you to stay if you feel its a benefit to you. I hope you just keep an open mind. 👍

monica
 
The correct explanation is NOT that God is not subject to the same laws that humans are subject to. The moral law is derived from the Nature of God, and God cannot act against His own Nature. It is not so much that God is bound by the moral law, but that the moral law is an expression of Who God Is. So in a sense God is subject to the same immutable moral law.
 
The correct explanation is NOT that God is not subject to the same laws that humans are subject to. The moral law is derived from the Nature of God, and God cannot act against His own Nature. It is not so much that God is bound by the moral law, but that the moral law is an expression of Who God Is. So in a sense God is subject to the same immutable moral law.
Okay. Then, you are making a case for my further confusion.
I would say then, that the God of the OT was not the same God of the NT.

But, that’s me.
 
forums.catholic-questions.org/showthread.php?p=3750688#post3750688

True , all of creation belongs to God ;yet when persons go against God’s ways , they invite in other agents , that in biblical language gets to be called as God’s wrath /anger and are powers against God !

It is God’s wisdom that through out scriptures God is the one mostly sited as the cause of it all so that our hearts would be focused to where it belongs !

May we be blessed to gratefully gaze on The Cross as the sign and source of our victory !
 
God “kills” people everyday–people die every day at all stages of life in a great multitude of manners.

Life is a gift from God, not something owed. It is not unjust to stop giving a gift.
 
forums.catholic-questions.org/showthread.php?p=3750688#post3750688

True , all of creation belongs to God ;yet when persons go against God’s ways , they invite in other agents , that in biblical language gets to be called as God’s wrath /anger and are powers against God !

It is God’s wisdom that through out scriptures God is the one mostly sited as the cause of it all so that our hearts would be focused to where it belongs !

May we be blessed to gratefully gaze on The Cross as the sign and source of our victory !
This is troubling also. Not all people condemened by God to death ever “went against God’s ways” they were simply not Jewish.
 
Okay. Then, you are making a case for my further confusion.
I would say then, that the God of the OT was not the same God of the NT.

But, that’s me.
That’s kind of where I ended up in my original discussion. Jesus came to show the world that God is a just, loving and merciful God. Sometimes, I think people look at just the OT and “judge” God (and Christianity) by the picture that it gives us of God.
 
That’s kind of where I ended up in my original discussion. Jesus came to show the world that God is a just, loving and merciful God. Sometimes, I think people look at just the OT and “judge” God (and Christianity) by the picture that it gives us of God.
This is true in my case. Of course, I had a few other things on the list, but this was how I saw things then.
 
That’s kind of where I ended up in my original discussion. Jesus came to show the world that God is a just, loving and merciful God. Sometimes, I think people look at just the OT and “judge” God (and Christianity) by the picture that it gives us of God.
Well, God apparently killed a lot of babies. You could look it up.

Genesis flood, etc.
 
Okay. Then, you are making a case for my further confusion.
I would say then, that the God of the OT was not the same God of the NT.

But, that’s me.
Perhaps the way Ron stated it confuses you?

I mean, well – let’s see: if God were able to die, then it is possible that nothing in the universe would have ever been created – and so nothing might have ever existed at all. – If that were the case, then, God would be like us – rather than we a lesser form (likeness) of him.

But then, didn’t God come as close to following the rules as is possible when he sent his only Son to suffer crucifixion and death? In fact, his son was murdered by thieves. How can anyone claim a double standard in the 10 commandments – when God has suffered murder himself? It is as if the commandment is really saying – do not try to kill ME – or you kill yourself. And in doing this, he is speaking the whole truth and meaning of the commandment. We are only alive when we have him in union with us – whenecver God is intimately present in his creation murder is forbidden because it tries to wipe God out of existance.
Animals may clearly be slaughtered, even though they have no soul which goes on after death.

So, How is it that one can really claim a double standard with the ten commandments, anyway?

Let me give a single example. God promised the messiah from the very beginning of Genesis. In the so called proto-evangelum, Eve is told she will be saved through her children (although Eve died) and that kngly Lord/Ruler would come through the tribe of Judah:
Genes 37:26 And Judah said unto his brethren, What profit is it if we slay our brother, and conceal his blood? …
Judah saw, thouigh crookedly, the meaning of the commandment not to kill.
Genes 38: And Er, Judah’s firstborn, was wicked in the sight of the LORD; and the LORD slew him…
The wickedness being most likely the pagan practices of his mother, and since Onan does likewise – one can understand that it had to do with the avoidance of having children with one’s wife – which is the only reason one can explain that Judah himself is not killed by God for the same reason.
Genes 46:12 And the sons of Judah; Er, and Onan, and Shelah, and Pharez, and Zarah: but Er and Onan died in the land of Canaan. And the sons of Pharez were Hezron and Hamul7
Of this Geneology which is here, the three sons born to Judah by the Caananite/pagan wife he had – all three of them died without a line of children after them.
Genes 49:10 The sceptre shall not depart from Judah, nor a lawgiver from between his feet, until Shiloh come; and unto him shall the gathering of the people be.
Even in the earliest prophecies concerning Judah – at a time when only God was to be king of Israel, before the sin of asking for King Saul to be in the likeness of other nations rather than the likeness of God – at this very time God already showed that the kingship was to be in Judah, his favored. This is the tribe which Jesus would come from.

Here’s the point: If Er, and Onan, had succeeded in preventing Judah from having children – the messiah would have not been able to come through that tribe. Since God had already planned it, the Sin of Onan and Er tried to prevent the salvation of all of us – if Jesus were not born, we would all be dead in our sins – murdered by the devil.

There are some things which God can’t do – such as lie. Since this is so, understand that even the principle of double effect can be used in the defense of God. The bible does not say How God slew these people, in fact the usual way (permitting angels / devils to do so) is not the direct killing by God – and since the devil is a murder from the beginning, one can hardly fault God allowing Er and Onan to be killed since their death would pave the way for the Messiah coming.

This is what I think is the key to biblical accounts of the OT. Often, God is spoken of as “doing” something when in fact that can at most be taken to mean God allowed the event to happen. The way it is stated, by a people with blood on their hands, is to show that God was soverign and ruled history – not to state that God destroyed his own image (man) whom he loved directly, himself.

In the NT, God is no different, to allow us all life – he too, in the second person of the Trinity, suffered death as an incarnate man – the only way God could be subject to the law of death.
 
Huiou,

I am sorry- there is no reasonable way to see God killing innocent babies! This is the one thing, my husband keeps drilling in my head each day!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top