G
GratefulFred
Guest
With the handle of “AntiTheist” I take it that you are maintaining a position that God does not exist or at least that Christ is not the Living Son of God. If so, that’s OK. I may not convince you for two main reasons. First, I am not a trained theologian, just a lifelong practicing Catholic in the pew every Sunday and then some. I am grateful for my life, my wife, my family and my Faith. Second, the connection from your ears and eyes to your heart may be blocked. If so, that blockage need not be permanent. Nonetheless, I and others will continue to state how we relate to God and His Son Jesus Christ.There’s not a single, contemporary, eyewitness account of Christ.
Contrast this with Washington – we have items that he owned, a house he lived in, texts he authored in his own hand, legislative records from when he was president of the United States, and – on top of all of this – descriptions of him given by his contemporaries.
To say that these claims are comparable is crazy.
Oral History is as valid as contemporary written history. If you interview your grandfather and he provides you his oral history and you write it down, is that delayed written history to be assumed false by future readers simply because you, the writer, did not personally experience it? I am talking about total rejection of the oral history not just some points that a reader may not fully understand.
To assert that such a delayed written history is false, one should be able to show just how your grandfather was lying and/or just how you wrote other than what he said to the point that you lied too.
So start with what is written that Christ said. What statements attributed to Christ are lies? My 4th grade teacher just knew I was lying when I told the class about a mink farm in Rhode Island. RI happens to be rather small and she, well educated and middle aged, was a native. She did not know about mink being raised for their pelts in RI so therefore it did not exist and thus I Iied. At least until parent conference when my mother confirmed that she was there with me in a particular rural town.
That Christ would come into the world was foretold in many places in the Old Testament. The New Testament documents that Christ fulfilled every sign of who would be the Son of God. No other historical figure has ever been foretold. That many rejected Him then and all through history for their own selfish reasons does not make Christ false. When we see what He taught and the fruits of His Teaching 2,000 years ago, we are compelled to at least accept that Christ did indeed exist and that His Teachings have had a huge positive effect on the world.
God seems silent today because many, especially those in the mass media who try to set trends, refuse to consider that Christ may indeed be the true Son of God. For them it is a badge of ‘honor’ that they be seen ignoring or doing opposite of what Christ taught. They drown out the soft voices of us who follow Christ and persuade others to reject Christ.
Intellectual honesty - try reading the Gospels and the New Testament with a presumption that what is written about Christ just may indeed be the Truth. Love one another. Forgive sins as we would have our sins forgiven. How are teachings like this false and to be rejected?