M
Mersenne
Guest
No, it objectively doesn’t make any sense otherwise, for reasons I already laid out. It only makes sense to you because you’re refusing to listen to what I’m saying. Certain conditions are necessary for the fleas not to understand the dog is there. Those conditions also must be present in god otherwise it’s a flawed analogy, logically. It doesn’t matter what does and does not make sense to you.You mean that, because of your understandings, the analogy makes no sense to you otherwise. The analogy makes fine sense to me.
Since you have placed something of a challenge out there, let us continue it.
Well, sense we’re talking about something that is suppose to be analogous to god, we have to assume the dog is also all powerful and all knowing and created the fleas. Then it would be incredibly easy.Let us assume tha tthe Dog is smart enough to concider the option of making himself known to the fleas.
How should he go about it?