R
richbansha
Guest
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ce17d/ce17dd73b308ae8d8100b825bfbd54a312945faf" alt="40.png"
Not so. Marriage is never over until death. A bishop may decide that a marriage does not exist, but if it does exist then it continues for life.In theory your advice sounds noble but there is a reality that must be dealt with. The marriage is over when a man is living with another woman. The legal part is a mere formality as far as morality is concerned.
That is a father’s job and nobody else’s. Lexee forfits that protection for her children if she deprives them of a father. If Lexee provokes her husband enough, then no black robed terrorist will be able to stop him from flushing the bunch of them.The divorce is important for other reasons. There are children who must be provided for. Lexee needs to do what she can to protect her children. It will ensure she gets the child support necessary to provide necessities like food, shelter, and medical care.
Here is the root of it then! Divorce is no longer a disgrace – it is a career opportunity! You can’t serve both God and money. If what you say were true then they would have already starved to death. From Lexee’s post, we have no indication that her husband has anything against the children. It is best for all concerned that she keep it that way. If her husband does decide to stop doing his fair share, the court option will still be open when and if she needs it.Letting it go gives him a free pass to continue hiding assets and will allow him to dodge the responsibilities of providing for Lexee and the children.
Is there no one who believes in for better or worse anymore? If this marriage was good enough to enter into, why is it not good enough to try to salvage? Maybe divorce is chic – everyone is doing it. The more acrimonious the better. It is a fine way to publicly vent your spleen and impress your friends with your bitterness. I still think that peace and contentment are a better lifestyle choice. But the decision is not mine.
Maybe I am just too old fashioned, but I always thought that “what God has joined, let no man put asunder” was a command and not just idle chatter. I suppose that since daytime tv has made divorce a spectator sport, there is no way back to the days when it was a reason for scorn. So be it. At least divorce has not been made mandatory yet.