K
Krisdun
Guest
Looking at the timeline of events should it not be the other way round?
No. Passion Sunday is Palm Sunday, the first day in Holy Week, commemorating the Triumphal Entry into Jerusalem. The Last Supper took place four days later, on Thursday evening.Looking at the timeline of events should it not be the other way round?
In the EF, Passion Sunday is the Sunday before Palm Sunday.No. Passion Sunday is Palm Sunday, the first day in Holy Week, commemorating the Triumphal Entry into Jerusalem. The Last Supper took place four days later, on Thursday evening.
Because that’s what we are heading towards. The Lord is processing in triumph in Jerusalem now, but not so the people can raise Him up as the king He rightfully is. All of Lent prepares us for this. We are now being reminded once again of what the importance of this week is.but the gospel reading for that mass also describes our Lord’s passion including his crucifixion and death on the cross.
Because for one, this didn’t happen on a Sunday, it happened on a Thursday, and two, the Triduum is a single Mass that lasts three days, starting on Holy Thursday, and it is the single most important Mass of the year. Parishes are not even to attempt to celebrate it if they cannot give it the reverence it deserves. Instead they’re supposed to go to a nearby church that can.I suppose another way of asking this is why was the mass of the last supper not made a Sunday mass considering its importance?
Yes, but we know for a fact what day of the week Holy Thursday was celebrated on. And they are not the most important event in the Christian calendar.There are many important feasts/events celebrated at Sunday masses throughout the year which in most likelihood did not occur on a Sunday originally.
There is no intervening Sunday between Palm Sunday and Easter.…therefore if you only attend mass on Sundays (which many people do) and you get the short version of the Palm Sunday gospel reading then you will miss out the last supper event.