Why doesn't the Bible say that Mary was sinless?

  • Thread starter Thread starter emeraldisle
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
ChrisWRIT;3596659]
*Amen. Romans 5:12 refers to the reality of original sin, do you agree with that as well?
Yes, Mary was human, like all other descendants of Adam, she was subject to contracting original sin. But by a special intervention of God, and NOT because of anything to do with her own merits, she was preserved by Christ at the moment of her conception from the stain of original sin.*
Where is the evidence for this claim? Its not mentioned or even hinted at in scripture.
Christ was her savior, just as He is “…the Savior of all men, and especially of those who believe.” (1 Tim. 4:10)
Christ fulfilled the 4th commandment, to “honor your father & mother”, better than anyone else could or can, by preemptively saving His mother at the moment of her conception!

There is no evidence that this is the case. Scripture is all we know of her and it never mentions this kind of thing. Jesus in the instances where He deals directly with His mother never hints at such a thing.
 
Actually, Mary’s sinlessness IS understood as “fitting” rather than “needful.” But then, strictly speaking, we do not understand the cross as “needful” since God could have saved us all by a wave of His ineffable Hand.
For I delivered to you first of all that which I also received: that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures, and that He was buried, and that He rose again the third day according to the Scriptures, 1 Cor 15:3-4

Now according to the Scriptures Mary was to be a virgin not a sinless virgin.

Therefore the Lord himself shall give you a sign; Behold, a virgin shall conceive, and bear a son, and shall call his name Immanuel. Isa 7:14
*
According to the Scriptures all of humanity is sinful and Mary is part of sinful humanity.
*
Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned: Rom 5:12


.
 
Now, now, try answering the question instead of trying to apply an out-of-context Bible verse. :tsktsk:
The question of this tread is “Why doesn’t the Bible say that Mary was sinless?”. So how are the following verses of Scripture out of context?
*
If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us. If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness. If we say that we have not sinned, we make him a liar, and his word is not in us. 1 John 1:8-10*

I don’t think these verses indicate that a human being can be sinless. Was Mary a human being?

.
 
For I delivered to you first of all that which I also received: that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures, and that He was buried, and that He rose again the third day according to the Scriptures, 1 Cor 15:3-4

Now according to the Scriptures Mary was to be a virgin not a sinless virgin.
Huh? I’m having trouble tracking you here. What does 1 Cor 15:3-4 have to do with Our Lady?
Therefore the Lord himself shall give you a sign; Behold, a virgin shall conceive, and bear a son, and shall call his name Immanuel. Isa 7:14
According to the Scriptures all of humanity is sinful and Mary is part of sinful humanity.

Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned: Rom 5:12.*Yes, dear. We understand your interpretation.
 
**1. Strong’s Definition for the word : “all”

Consider the Greek. Romans 3:23 and 5:12, (“all have sinned”) use the Greek word “pantes” for “all.”
“Pantes” is a derivative of “pas,” which has the following meaning, according to Strong’s Lexicon:


3956 pas { pas} . . .

GK - 4246 { pa`” }

1) individually
1a) each, every, any, all, the whole, everyone, all things, everything
2) collectively
2a) some of all types

“… the whole world has gone after him” [John 12:19 ] Did all the world go after Christ?

“then went all Judea, and were baptized of him in Jordan.” [Matt. 3: 5-6] Was all Judea, or all Jerusalem, baptized in Jordan?

“Ye are of God, little children”, and the whole world lieth in the wicked one”. [1 John 5:19] Does the whole world there mean everybody?

The words “world” and “all” are used in some seven or eight senses in Scripture, and it is very rarely the “all” means all persons, taken individually. The words are generally used to signify that Christ has redeemed some of all sorts – some Jews, some Gentiles, some rich, some poor, and has not restricted His redemption to either Jew or Gentile …

C.H. Spurgeon from a sermon on Particular Redemption
Enhanced Strong’s Lexicon, (Oak Harbor, WA: Logos Research Systems, Inc…) 1995.
 
1. Strong’s Definition for the word : “all”

****Consider the Greek. Romans 3:23 and 5:12, (“all have sinned”) use the Greek word “pantes” for “all.” ****
“Pantes” is a derivative of “pas,” which has the following meaning, according to Strong’s Lexicon:

**3956 pas { pas} **. . .

GK - 4246 { pa`” }

1)
individually
1a) each, every, any, all, the whole, everyone, all things, everything
2) collectively
2a) some of all types

“… the whole world has gone after him” [John 12:19 ] Did all the world go after Christ?

“then went all Judea, and were baptized of him in Jordan.” [Matt. 3: 5-6] Was all Judea, or all Jerusalem, baptized in Jordan?

“Ye are of God, little children”, and the whole world lieth in the wicked one”. [1 John 5:19] Does the whole world there mean everybody?

The words “world” and “all” are used in some seven or eight senses in Scripture, and it is very rarely the “all” means all persons, taken individually. The words are generally used to signify that Christ has redeemed some of all sorts – some Jews, some Gentiles, some rich, some poor, and has not restricted His redemption to either Jew or Gentile …

C.H. Spurgeon from a sermon on Particular Redemption
Enhanced Strong’s Lexicon, (Oak Harbor, WA: Logos Research Systems, Inc…) 1995.
That’s it! I knew I “knew” that from somewhere in my Protestant past! THANK you!

Lord: Thank you for Strong!
 
Hey gang, this thread is 21 posts over the limit. See you on a new incarnation of this thread?
 
Of which sins, in particular, do you accuse her? Was she a thief? An adultress? An idoloter? Perhaps a murderer? 🤷
She was aware of her need of a Savior which means she saw herself as a sinner. See Luke 1:47.
Also some influencial men in the early church saw her as a sinner.
Augustine Bishop of Hippo “Whatever flesh of sin Jesus took, He took of the flesh of the sin of his mother. Jesus did not partake of sin, but took of his mother, which came under the judgment of sin.”
Augustine “ He, Christ alone, being made man but remaining God never had any sin, nor did he take of the flesh of sin. Though He took flesh of the sin of his mother.”
Pope innocent the third (1216 a.d.) “She (Eve) was produced without sin, but she brought forth in sin, she (Mary) was produced in sin, but she brought forth without sin.” ( De festo Assump., sermon 2)

Pope Leo 1 (440 a.d.) “The Lord Jesus Christ alone among the sons of men was born immaculate”(sermon 24 in Nativ. Dom.).
.N.D. Kelly comments:
“Origen insisted that, like all human beings, she [Mary] needed redemption from her sins; in particular, he interpreted Simeon’s prophecy (Luke 2, 35) that a sword would pierce her soul as confirming that she had been invaded with doubts when she saw her Son crucified.” (Early Christian Doctrines [San Francisco, California: HarperCollins Publishers, 1978], p. 493)

Its not necessary to know the specific sins of people to claim they are sinners. There mere fact that they are conceived through a a man and woman causes them to inherit the sin of Adam.
 
Pantas is the nominative, plural, masculine of “Pas.”
I am no linguists either. But conceptually, and semantically, a masculine form seems to be conspicuous in implying at best around “half” or “many” in its semantic silence of the feminine context through gender exclusion. Yes? 😉

James
 
I am no linguists either. But conceptually, and semantically, a masculine form seems to be conspicuous in implying at best around “half” or “many” in its semantic silence of the feminine context through gender exclusion. Yes? 😉

James
Sorry. Can’t play that card here!
 
Huh? I’m having trouble tracking you here. What does 1 Cor 15:3-4 have to do with Our Lady?
*For I delivered to you first of all that which I also received: that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures, and that He was buried, and that He rose again the third day according to the Scriptures, 1 Cor 15:3-4
*

Now according to the Scriptures Mary was to be a virgin not a sinless virgin.
  • Therefore the Lord himself shall give you a sign; Behold, a virgin shall conceive, and bear a son, and shall call his name Immanuel. Isa 7:14 *
According to the Scriptures all of humanity is sinful and Mary is part of sinful humanity.

Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned: Rom 5:12.

.
 
She was aware of her need of a Savior which means she saw herself as a sinner. See Luke 1:47.
A person who is saved is no longer a sinner. If Mary was saved, then she was not at the same time a sinner.
Also some influencial men in the early church saw her as a sinner.
Augustine Bishop of Hippo “Whatever flesh of sin Jesus took, He took of the flesh of the sin of his mother. Jesus did not partake of sin, but took of his mother, which came under the judgment of sin.”
St. Augustine was strongly influenced by the Manicheans, who believed that all flesh is sinful. This led to some unfortunate conclusions in many of his writings, including that sex between married persons is sinful, as well. When it comes to matters of “the flesh,” St. Augustine is simply not a reliable source, even though on other subjects, he is better than most.
 
I am no linguists either. But conceptually, and semantically, a masculine form seems to be conspicuous in implying at best around “half” or “many” in its semantic silence of the feminine context through gender exclusion. Yes? 😉

James
In Mt 16:18, the “bedrock” (Gk petra), upon which Christ will build His church is "feminine."

Now what do you do, James? Repent, perhaps? 🙂
 
Is this an admission that there is nothing in Scripture to signify that Mary ever sinned?
Is there anything in Scripture that says “Emeraldisle” told a lie in “somedate” 2002?

Am I along with Mary part of sinful humanity?
*
Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned: Rom 5:12.*

.
 
Is there anything in Scripture that says “Emeraldisle” told a lie in “somedate” 2002?
No, of course not. The canon of the Scriptures predates such an event by nearly two millenia.
Am I along with Mary part of sinful humanity?
You are a human being, but if you are in Christ, then it is to be hoped that you are not “sinful” - have your sins not been washed away in His blood? If they have, then you are no longer a “sinner” - you are among the redeemed, alongside Mary, who was redeemed at the moment of her conception.
Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned: Rom 5:12.
Consider the context. He is saying that without Christ, we are in our sins. But with Christ, our sins are washed away, and we become righteous (that is, without sin).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top