Why don't more Catholic pastors solve important issues that are well within their competency and authority to solve?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Exegete
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Because no matter how tactful I might have been, one or more of those people would have then went to our pastor and sunk a political knife into my back
How do you know that?? You’re saying that they would have tried to destroy you if you would have spoken to them about it? That doesn’t make sense unless there is some underlying resentment already there.

But you’ve posted pictures of them online accusing them of grave sin. What is that if not a stab in the back?

All in all, your method of going about this isn’t very good. It’s probably not going to get results, and may sink you if the people in that photo find out about it. I’m also guessing that your accusation along with the photo is a violation of CAF’s Terms of Service. I would think it would be best to delete the photo, and continue on with your thread without it.
 
I mean, let’s look at how much time it would take to address this. Either mention at each mass one weekend “please don’t come into the sanctuary after mass” or ask someone to make a small sign you can tape to the altar that says the same thing
 
How do you know that?? You’re saying that they would have tried to destroy you if you would have spoken to them about it? That doesn’t make sense unless there is some underlying resentment already there.
From personal experience, and from observing others. It does make sense depending on the parish. The political infighting at my parish is ugly. I stay clear of it. I have seen a number of very good people leave over it.
 
You’re right…

But it should go deeper than that. There’s clearly something already broken when people comport themselves in the manner shown in the photo.

Lay out the law, sure, but it also needs to be coupled with a bit of catechesis. Not a huge project though.

Oddly enough there is a sign that rolled out into place that says “please do not enter the sanctuary.”
 
I also suspect some or all (except for the sacristan) wouldn’t even realize how unacceptable their behavior is. The old proverb “familiarly breeds contempt” no doubt plays a part in this matter.
I don’t know your age, but I suspect that there could be a generational distinction here. Being an old guy myself, I can recall times when there was a quite sharp distinction between the sanctuary and the rest of the church. Only the priest and the altar servers routinely entered the sanctuary during Mass, and the sacristan and others tended to the sanctuary after Mass. People never entered the sanctuary unless for a serious purpose. It was akin to the Holy of Holies.

With the advent of lay lectors and EMHC’s and others, that changed, and sometimes people who had such duties during Mass came to treat the sanctuary as a sort of personal domain. In doing so, the sense of being in a holy place seems to have diminished. I doubt that they find anything wrong with chatting in the sanctuary. It’s a matter of what one has become accustomed to.
 
Nobody here has any way to tell whether you’re telling the truth or not about the people in your picture. The time has come to flag your posts and ask @camoderator to take a look at them.
 
It’s like deja vu all over again
40.png
Do you appreciate reverence and decorum in the celebration of the Mass Liturgy and Sacraments
Do you appreciate the presence of reverence and decorum in the celebration of the Mass? Do you appreciate when it’s clear that those in the sanctuary adequately prepared to execute their parts of the celebration to the best of their abilities and with great dignity? Are you thankful for all the underpinnings (from the mindset and expectations of those in the sanctuary, to their intrinsic abilities, to the the church building and all of its furnishings) which made possible the celebration of t…
 
I have been thinking and praying about this photo since Ash Wednesday when I took it.
Couple of thoughts come to mind…would use of cell phone or other cameras be something to curtail inside the sanctuary?..why is calling things to the attention of lay ministers exclusively the burden of the pastor, aren’t we all called to charitable fraternal correction?
 
In doing so, the sense of being in a holy place seems to have diminished. I doubt that they find anything wrong with chatting in the sanctuary. It’s a matter of what one has become accustomed to.
I concur, and that’s sad.
 
This is not just any fire and if the pastor is capable at their job,
How would you like your pastor to remedy the problem?

& is it your pastor’s job to fix this “problem.” The sacrastan in the midst of his duties, does he have a responsibility to shush people away from the altar?

Do you have any elders? Church council? Any respected member of the congregation who can help improve the standard of sanctity in your sanctuary?

My only real concern about this situation is you said it’s two minutes after mass. I know your priest has other concerns two minutes after mass.

We do a bad job of doing our part. Pastors come & go. These are our parishes
 
You may not put things not needed for mass on the altar. That includes signs. One priest in our diocese may be pastor of three churches. I don’t know how they even get to all the masses so when a priest says he doesn’t have time as one did here believe him.
 
Seeing other responses on here, I’m a little embarrassed. As an ex-Protestant and new convert—being received into the Church this Easter, yay!—I researched extensively the reverence and decorum one ought to have when around our Lord present in the Blessed Sacrament, partially so I can avoid causing a scandal. I agree wholeheartedly, based only on what I can see in the photo and off your commentary, that absolutely, something is terribly wrong here.
When I was a Baptist, I was hesitant to step even on the stage for preaching, because it was above my state, so perhaps I’m merely naturally more reverent. But to lean against the wall or the lectern and chat idly (what it looks like, particularly when you explain there are no clergy in the photo) is frankly ridiculous. I have no answer to the main question you presented, but I did want to weigh in and say I’m on your side. They should be more respectful of the reality in that tabernacle next to them, and the altar on which it was consecrated, at the same distance.

All that said, I will agree to caution against assuming things—because assuming is for Mary. ba-dum tss

Sorry. Just wanted to make that joke.

EDIT: Thinking again with all the calls to charity, I’m gonna use a reductio ad absurdum: the money changers in the temple. By the same principle, to be “charitable,” according the standard here, Jesus should have just ignored them, assuming instead they were raising money for charity, or were going to give all their proceeds to the temple, or even were just trying to feed their family. Is that what Jesus did?

No! Heaven forbid! He saw the disrespect for His Father’s house, and drove them out with a literal whip. How much more should we mourn and take action against the disrespect shown to the body of our Lord?
 
Last edited:
All this falderal and yet no one has tried to answer my original question: "Why don’t more Catholic pastors solve important issues that are well within their competency and authority to solve?"

Other than what amounts to “I don’t have the time” of course.
It may amount to “I have a lot of other equally/more important issues to deal with AT THIS MOMENT”.
As has been said already, charity requires we think the best of everyone (pastor and parishioners alike.

He may have a quiet word to the parishioners at another time … or he may ask the sacristan or whoever to do so … so as not to embarrass anyone (that’s part of being pastoral as well)

Most importantly it doesn’t seem to me that he is particularly required to account for what he does or doesn’t do about an issue to someone who, it appears, hasn’t even brought said issue up with him. Is he (or any priest) supposed to read your mind and so discern that this is clearly a burning issue with you?

And what if it is? Is he required to allocate every issue exactly the same priority or urgency that it has for you? I wouldn’t think so, given that you aren’t privy to everything else he may have to deal with.
 
This is not just any fire and if the pastor is capable at their job, it shouldn’t flare up again. This is not a project that would take hours of preparation and a series of meetings to complete.
So, let me make sure I understand what you’re saying here. You want a pastor who will essentially lay the law down, is that right? Someone who will just waltz up there and say, “Hey, this isn’t the place to be having your conversation. Take it somewhere else.” That’s all well and good. But, such an approach (if in fact such an approach was warranted in this case and I’m by no means convinced that it was), has ramifications. Please see below.
That sounds like more of a dismissive excuse than anything else. What I find that poisons parishes are pastors that ignore problems. That also drives people away, or in this case, question things like the Real Presence.
Absolutely. It is dismissive. Here’s the reality…we get dozens of these types of emails all the time. At least an email has a name attached to it. Usually it’s a note stuck in the mailbox with no name, or dropped in the collection, or something like that. Those go straight to the garbage. The truth of the matter is that my job as a priest is to preach the Gospel, to lead people to Jesus Christ, to help them grow in holiness. To the extent that dealing with things like this leads to that end, I will address it. When it doesn’t (most of the time), I won’t.
Because no matter how tactful I might have been, one or more of those people would have then went to our pastor and sunk a political knife into my back. Also one of the first things my pastor would have said is “mind your own business.” As incredulous as it might seem, I also suspect some or all (except for the sacristan) wouldn’t even realize how unacceptable their behavior is. The old proverb “familiarly breeds contempt” no doubt plays a part in this matter.
This continues my answer from above on your first point. As you rightly note, because you refused to go to them yourself, a pastor going in and “laying down the law,” so to speak, carries with it ramifications. Among them, just off the top of my head, are alienating people in the parish and publicly berating someone in an inappropriate manner. If what you say is true, why should your pastor subject himself to the same treatment? Especially if he’s new and doesn’t have the same level of familiarity with the people? Should he sabotage his ministry right at the outset?

There are a myriad of ways to address something like people talking in the sanctuary. Personally, I subscribe to the adage that more is “caught than taught.” People need to see examples. Want people to stop talking in the sanctuary? Start praying the rosary before or after Mass. Expose the Blessed Sacrament and foster Eucharistic adoration. Things like that. People are led to understand what our faith professes about Christ’s True Presence. And the pastor doesn’t have to say, “Hey! Shut up!” It takes a long time to correct things. Rome wasn’t built in a day, as they say.
 
Do the people in your picture know that you, a fellow parishioner, took their picture and have now posted it on the web for public discussion and comment about how you think they’re all being irreverent and doing things that are wrong (except the one lady doing her ministry)? When I enlarge that photo on my laptop, I can see the people facing the camera well enough that I could recognize them if I knew them.

I know the US does not have strong privacy laws, but this seems pretty tactless of you. I would not be happy if somebody from my parish was taking pictures of me and the priest and other parishioners, and then putting them on CAF with many critical comments.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top