Why don't religious orders have permanent deacons?

  • Thread starter Thread starter MarcusRoffensis
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
The priest vests as a priest and serves as a concelebrating priest…he does not serve as a deacon…pre Vatican II priests would vest a deacons and serve as deacons…this if no longer permitted.
The point is that every priest is also a deacon. There is no such thing as a Mass without a deacon because every priest is a deacon.

The deacon has a threefold ministry in the Church - word, liturgy and service. When a deacon is ordained, he becomes the ordinary minister of the Gospel. The deacon is the proclaimer of the Gospel in the Church.

When a priest steps to the ambo and proclaims the Gospel, no matter how he is vested, he is fulfilling the ministry he recieved as proclaimer of the word when he was ordained as a deacon.

It doesn’t matter how the priest is vested - Word, Liturgy and Service are the ministries he recieved when he was ordained a deacon. Most priests will tell you that most of their time is spent in diacanoia - service - rather than sacradotal functions.

-Tim-
 
40.png
UncleBill:
I don’t believe this is permitted since VII.

Actually, when a priest reads the Gospel, he does so as a Deacon.
 
This is a little late to the conversation, but priests may act as deacons in both extraordinary and ordinary forms of the mass. This photo is from the ordinary form during Ash Wednesday from a few years back.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top