D
drbible1611
Guest
Did I say that?You mean we didn’t have a single true Bible believing Christian until 1611?![]()
Did I say that?You mean we didn’t have a single true Bible believing Christian until 1611?![]()
Just read the passages-it’s as simple as that-no interpretation needed.I didn’t really see anything that seemed Protestant in those passages. Could you explain how exactly they help your case?
Also I’d appreciate it if you didn’t imply that Catholicism teaches that Luther is Hell bound. Only God knows who goes to Hell.
You demand do you? Evidently I have ruffled some feathers?I demand explicit Biblical citation for every single one of your claims
Yup!
Really?God only inspired and preserved one Bible for the English speaking folk THE KING JAMES BIBLE.
Amen.Well, you got me—I mean, declaring the 17th century Bible translation of King James, a mere 1600 years too late for the apostolic age, to be the infallible instrument of God…
Waitaminute----why’d it take so long?
Better put away the brimstone and bring logic, reason, and evidence to bear. Bluster gets you nowhere around here. I can get bluster at any intersection in Uptown Charlotte.
Yes you did.Did I say that?
Oh, marvelous. Please tell us more about what we believe. Come back tomorrow. I’ll tell you all about what YOU believe…Ha, ha , ha…
No you believe tradition and what the Catholic Church tells you to believe!
Super. Tell me about these, perhaps a link. By whose authority were these canons defined?The Syriak and OLD Latin Bible circa 100-150 AD did NOT contain the Apocrypha.
Boy Oh boy where do you get your information from?Really?
What about all the people who spoke English before 1611? They did have Bibles, before. . .they even had Bibles that were written in English. . .
Why did God wait so long (Chaucer wrote in the 1300s–good old Middle English-)?
And why did He wait for ENGLISH people to preserve a Bible?
Which Bible did God inspire and preserve for the non-English speaking folk, anyway?
And finally, where in the Bible do we find a list of books which are **to be included **in the Bible, the verse that says that the Bible is the only or ultimate authority, and **to whom **authority is given to **authentically interpret **the Bible?
![]()
Excuse me…I hate to butt in here, but you seem to have sailed right past my post #39.I have given you historical facts and Biblical facts that confirm the apocrypha is not part of the OT canon.
Address the issue!
I second this. Those passages do not say what drbible says they do. Perhaps he will provide a sound exegesis.I didn’t really see anything that seemed Protestant in those passages. Could you explain how exactly they help your case?
Don’t your beliefs rely exclusivly on the Bible even though the Bible never says to do so?You demand do you? Evidently I have ruffled some feathers?
You are demanding Biblical quotations. How come? Doesn’t the Church rely on Tradition and the Magisterium as well?
Teflon93,
We believe the Bible.
**Ha, ha , ha…
No you believe tradition and what the Catholic Church tells you to believe! **
Good thing both of those tell us to believe the Bible.
If you believed the Bible you would get saved and start preaching the gospel to a world that is on it’s way to Hell.
Post 39.Let’s face it-the Catholic Church has been caught with it’s pants down with regards to the OT canon as I have proved from the words of Jesus Christ and historical fact (go to your local synagogue and have a look at the Hebrew Scriptures).
The Catholic Church NEVER gave us the Bible, but hid it as history clearly proves.
If it wasn’t for the English Reformer’s you Catholic ‘Bible Believer’s’ would be still be having your priests reading from the LATIN VULGATE an ‘unknown’ tongue.
Not one of you has been able to disprove THE FACTS I have given you!
Jesus often quoted from the Septuagint, which contains all the same books as the Catholic OT. He even quoted verses from a few of the deuterocanonical books. If you’d rather side with the Jews today who reject Jesus as the Messiah, more power to ya. I think I’ll stick with the Bible Jesus read, unedited.Let’s face it-the Catholic Church has been caught with it’s pants down with regards to the OT canon as I have proved from the words of Jesus Christ and historical fact (go to your local synagogue and have a look at the Hebrew Scriptures).
History says otherwise, actually. The Catholic Church preserved all the manuscripts, even your beloved Textus Receptus was the result of Catholic monks spending their days copying manuscripts.The Catholic Church NEVER gave us the Bible, but hid it as history clearly proves.
If it wasn’t for the English Reformer’s you Catholic ‘Bible Believer’s’ would be still be having your priests reading from the LATIN VULGATE an ‘unknown’ tongue.
Facts? I’m seeing a lot of unsupported, uncited propaganda, but no facts.Not one of you has been able to disprove THE FACTS I have given you!
Are you suggesting that we as Christians should rely on the authority of a Jewish council held a century AFTER the death, resurrection and ascension of our Lord as to what the CHRISTIAN Bible should contain? They had ALREADY rejected the Messiah…and the authority that had been vested in them by God had been stripped from them and given to the Church. Yet you expect us to look to them to tell us what is God-breathed scripture?Let’s face it-the Catholic Church has been caught with it’s pants down with regards to the OT canon as I have proved from the words of Jesus Christ and historical fact (go to your local synagogue and have a look at the Hebrew Scriptures).
anyone familiar with the history of the Catholic Church, which for 2,000 years has been preserving and protecting the Word of God, recognizes how ludicrous this is. It was is only by the authority of the Catholic Church, which collected the various books of Scripture in the fourth century, that we have a Christian Bible at all. And it is only because of the Church that the Bible survived and was taught for the many centuries before the printing press made it widely available. All Christians everywhere owe it a great debt for that.The Catholic Church NEVER gave us the Bible, but hid it as history clearly proves.
Baloney. It is a fact usually ignored by Protestant historians that many English versions of the Scriptures existed before Wycliff, and these were authorized and perfectly legal (see Where We Got the Bible by Henry Graham, chapter 11, “Vernacular Scriptures Before Wycliff”). Also legal would be any future authorized translations. And certainly reading these translations was not only legal but also encouraged. All this law did was to prevent any private individual from publishing his own translation of Scripture without the approval of the Church.If it wasn’t for the English Reformer’s you Catholic ‘Bible Believer’s’ would be still be having your priests reading from the LATIN VULGATE an ‘unknown’ tongue.
I haven’t seen any “facts”…only assertions.Not one of you has been able to disprove THE FACTS I have given you!