Y
YHWH_Christ
Guest
Devil’s advocate here (currently debating an agnostic).
Sure maybe you can argue philosophically for the existence of God but, why believe that God is Yahweh of the Bible? There are thousands of religions out there, and the adherents of those religions believe in them just as strongly as other adherents in other religions. What evidence is there for Christianity over Judaism or Islam or Hinduism or Buddhism or any other religion? And on top of that, why does it appear that there are so many contradictions or errors in traditional belief? When reading the Hebrew Bible Yahweh appears as no more than a tribal deity, indeed Biblical criticism has demonstrated quite well the evolution of Israelite religion and it appears to not be that different from the other religions in the near east at that time. Why should I believe it’s superior? Why should I have faith in absence of compelling evidence? It seems that many religions, especially the Abrahamics, often move the goal post in defining what God is in light of theological developments or philosophical developments or scientific ones. For example, although the Bible certainly isn’t a science book and isn’t trying to teach science, the cosmology it presents is the primitive cosmology of the ancient near east and many core ideas in Judaism and Christianity come from that. The cherubim, for example, seem to be based off the ancient near eastern mythological creatures known as the lamassu, why should I then believe that the cherbuim have an ontological existence over any other near eastern mythological creature?
Sure maybe you can argue philosophically for the existence of God but, why believe that God is Yahweh of the Bible? There are thousands of religions out there, and the adherents of those religions believe in them just as strongly as other adherents in other religions. What evidence is there for Christianity over Judaism or Islam or Hinduism or Buddhism or any other religion? And on top of that, why does it appear that there are so many contradictions or errors in traditional belief? When reading the Hebrew Bible Yahweh appears as no more than a tribal deity, indeed Biblical criticism has demonstrated quite well the evolution of Israelite religion and it appears to not be that different from the other religions in the near east at that time. Why should I believe it’s superior? Why should I have faith in absence of compelling evidence? It seems that many religions, especially the Abrahamics, often move the goal post in defining what God is in light of theological developments or philosophical developments or scientific ones. For example, although the Bible certainly isn’t a science book and isn’t trying to teach science, the cosmology it presents is the primitive cosmology of the ancient near east and many core ideas in Judaism and Christianity come from that. The cherubim, for example, seem to be based off the ancient near eastern mythological creatures known as the lamassu, why should I then believe that the cherbuim have an ontological existence over any other near eastern mythological creature?
Last edited: