B
Balaco
Guest
Having a bit of trouble understanding the concept.
The blood is the life. It is used to seal covenants, because covenants are declarations made of our lives and in making you mine and me yours.Deuteronomy 12: 23 Only be sure that you do not eat the blood; for the blood is the life, and you shall not eat the life with the flesh.
What do you mean by covering sin? Do you me forgiven of sin?Having a bit of trouble understanding the concept.
They are suffering in our place, they are being punished for our sins.Having a bit of trouble understanding the concept.
No. It was not a matter of penal substitution. It’s not that the suffering of animals was intended to make up for our sins or satisfy God’s justice. It was a stand in for us, but what you said is not the reason why. At least not in Catholic teaching.They are suffering in our place, they are being punished for our sins.
Jesus suffered for usNo. It was not a matter of penal substitution. It’s not that the suffering of animals was intended to make up for our sins or satisfy God’s justice. It was a stand in for us, but what you said is not the reason why. At least not in Catholic teaching.
It should also be noted that it was not just animals that were offered. Grains and other such things were offered, too. Another reason for such offerings is the idea that we offer God the first and the best of what we reap. We don’t offer him nothing. We don’t offer him the defects or even what we can do without. We offer him the prizes among what we own. The best. The most perfect. And that is true today. We should put God first, not just in places that least interfere with our lives.
Let’s suppose that you go out to dinner with your family, and when the food arrives, one meal is not prepared well. You speak to the waitress, and she takes it back to the kitchen. But by the time the second plate arrives, you’ve been waiting a long time.Having a bit of trouble understanding the concept.
This is ALMOST the Jewish understanding of the blood sacrifice. Yes, the life is in the blood. But, the victim had to be unblemished, male. and young, for that matter. It wasn’t the blood that was purified by the altar, but the other way around. The altar was purified by the blood. The Temple altar was dedicated and consecrated with blood, and the repeated sacrifices and sprinkling with blood RE-DEDICATED the altar, at least twice a day (morning and evening sacrifices) SO THAT GOD WOULD NOT DEPART FROM THEM because of their constant and repeated sinning (which desecrated the altar and God’s dwelling in the Holy of Holies).The blood is the life. …
The animal blood on the altar was a stand in for our own blood and our fallen state. By splashing the blood on the altar, the blood it stood for, which was unclean by sin, was purified and made clean. Though the truth is that animal blood, even if symbolic, could never truly stand in for us in a perfect way.
It’s not that God desired blood. But blood is precious. It is our life. That is how the culture understood it, and so it was incorporated into worship.
Only the divine man, in which the blood of man is truly in contact with the divine nature and made clean, could redeem us in His blood, and in which it is given as a sign of an everlasting covenant and a declaration that God is adopting us into his family (his blood, in a sense). In the blood, which is life, could God give his divine life with us, and make us brothers and sisters of His Son.
Thank you! I’ve never quite understood the concept either and these ideas actually make sense to me. And thanks to the OP for posing the question, which I’ve not been able to formulate properly to ask.This is ALMOST the Jewish understanding of the blood sacrifice. Yes, the life is in the blood. But, the victim had to be unblemished, male. and young, for that matter. It wasn’t the blood that was purified by the altar, but the other way around. The altar was purified by the blood. The Temple altar was dedicated and consecrated with blood, and the repeated sacrifices and sprinkling with blood RE-DEDICATED the altar, at least twice a day (morning and evening sacrifices) SO THAT GOD WOULD NOT DEPART FROM THEM because of their constant and repeated sinning (which desecrated the altar and God’s dwelling in the Holy of Holies).
This blood offering, of course, symbolizes and pre-figures Jesus. Without the Tabernacle offerings in this manner, the manner of Jesus’ death would not be clear, at all.It would not be clear why he had to die (for our sins) on the cross.
People who ridicule the Bible simply don’t understand it. We have to go inside the Bible and submit to it to understand who Jesus is and what he did for us. This is the reason the “old testament” doesn’t just go away after Jesus comes. In fact, C. Joseph Ratzinger says the “new testament” doesn’t make sense without the old testament.
There had been many crucifixions and deaths, but only one that atoned for our sins and the sins of the world.
Well, thanks for writing before the phone died. This makes great sense to me and I have wondered too about the “blood”!The blood is the life. It is used to seal covenants, because covenants are declarations made of our lives and in making you mine and me yours.
The animal blood on the altar was a stand in for our own blood and our fallen state. By splashing the blood on the altar, the blood it stood for, which was unclean by sin, was purified and made clean. Though the truth is that animal blood, even if symbolic, could never truly stand in for us in a perfect way.
It’s not that God desired blood. But blood is precious. It is our life. That is how the culture understood it, and so it was incorporated into worship.
Only the divine man, in which the blood of man is truly in contact with the divine nature and made clean, could redeem us in His blood, and in which it is given as a sign of an everlasting covenant and a declaration that God is adopting us into his family (his blood, in a sense). In the blood, which is life, could God give his divine life with us, and make us brothers and sisters of His Son.
Just a quick sketch. My phone is about to die.
Wow, John, what a lot for an old Catholic to think about and savor… I love it…Not just “any animal”, but the first born male, and there may be no more born; you are risking your own life when you sacrifice this, because what do you live on if there are no more.
You give your first fruits of harvest, but what if there are no more due to a sudden storm; again you are called to give your life back into God.
With Jesus, he came to be man giving his whole being into the Father, by doing his will to the point of death. He did give his life to the Father, but he also gave something into us, his whole body and blood. We eat his flesh and drink his blood. When you are handed that wafer, the priest does not say, “a part of the body of Christ”, nor “a drop of his blood”. He says, as he holds that wafer, this wafer is “The Body of Christ”. You consume All of Jesus Body and Blood in that little wafer and that little sip.
Just as the Son, from eternity, pours his whole being into the Father, the Holy Spirit proceeding from him into the Father, so also, from eternity the Father pours his entire being into the Son, the Holy Spirit proceeding from him into the Son. But in time, the Son is also Man, Jesus. In the resurrection, the life poured out into the Father was now the Father pouring his whole being, life, into the Son, and Jesus rose.
But with what Jesus gave us, his body and blood, the Father does not “ignore” this. But pours his whole being into the body and blood of his son, which is in us. The Holy Spirit proceeds into us who have been given the body and blood for resurrection of Jesus. The resurrection was not just to his body on the third day, but to his body. And where is his body, if you went to Mass on Sunday?
This is ALMOST the Jewish understanding of the blood sacrifice. Yes, the life is in the blood. But, the victim had to be unblemished, male. and young, for that matter. It wasn’t the blood that was purified by the altar, but the other way around. The altar was purified by the blood. The Temple altar was dedicated and consecrated with blood, and the repeated sacrifices and sprinkling with blood RE-DEDICATED the altar, at least twice a day (morning and evening sacrifices) SO THAT GOD WOULD NOT DEPART FROM THEM because of their constant and repeated sinning (which desecrated the altar and God’s dwelling in the Holy of Holies).
This blood offering, of course, symbolizes and pre-figures Jesus. Without the Tabernacle offerings in this manner, the manner of Jesus’ death would not be clear, at all.It would not be clear why he had to die (for our sins) on the cross.
People who ridicule the Bible simply don’t understand it. We have to go inside the Bible and submit to it to understand who Jesus is and what he did for us. This is the reason the “old testament” doesn’t just go away after Jesus comes. In fact, C. Joseph Ratzinger says the “new testament” doesn’t make sense without the old testament.
There had been many crucifixions and deaths, but only one that atoned for our sins and the sins of the world.
I have great difficulty in accepting the Father asking for the torture/sacrifice of his innocent Son in order to appease him for the sins of others. First this is patently immoral even if the son volunteered. Secondly, the guilty , at least, at that instance, remained unpunished. Even if the guilty were to be subsequently punished(which will happen upon their death or Final Judgement) , then the punishment would have been inflicted twice which is also immoral. The Just Father must reject this offer of substitution because two wrongs don’t make it right.Similarly (I hope), God is the aggrieved party when it comes to our sins which offend him. Therefore, if God asks for the sacrifice of a sheep or His own Son, then that is what we present to Him.
Why? How? Because this is what God has asked for.
I had to shorten your quote; I talk too much and went past the 6000 character limit…I …
How did his death actually do that? The world still sin. We still get punished upon death/Judgement. So what does “save us from our sins” really mean? I don’t think it refers to Original Sin either. Add to it is that his death redeemed us all but not all are saved. How did his death redeemed us all? Who was paid off and how did the debt originated? How to put all these together so that all of it makes sense?
Someone please help.