inJESUS:
Cathgal, please do not answer to his posts unless he answers whether mohammad denied Jesus Son of God or not…if he doesn’t, it’s a sign for you not to waste your time…
Mr. inJESUS,
Are you at the false impression that there can be no other explanation/interpretation other than what you or your Catholic Church teaches you?
If so, then consider carefully this different interpretations DILEMMA within the Catholic Church.
**The fate of children who die before baptism has interested Christians since the religion’s earliest days. **
The idea was first suggested by
St Gregory of Nazianzus (329-390 AD), who believed that the unbaptised would neither be punished nor access the full glory of God.
This was dismissed by **St Augustine ** of Hippo (354-430 AD), who insisted instead that baptism was necessary for salvation and that even babies would be consigned to hell if they were not baptised.
[
jesus-is-savior.com/Fals…_confusion.htm]](
http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Fals…_confusion.htm])
What do you think about
St Gregory of Nazianzus (329-390 AD) and **St Augustine ** of Hippo (354-430 AD)? Do they have one interpretation? Not to mention what recent popes say/believe/interpret this issue.
Now as to the “Son of God” issue, would you please qoute **Acts 3:26 ** from two Catholic Bibles ( The New American Bible and The Douay Rheims Bible)?
Lets see if these both Catholic official Bibles have ONE interpretation, let alone non-Catholic Bibles of other denominations, sects and cults of Christiandom.
Again, I am just asking you to qoute **Acts 3:26 ** from two Catholic Bibles (i.e. *The New American Bible * and
The Douay Rheims Bible). And below are the links:
Douay Rheims Bible:
drbo.org/
The New American Bible:
usccb.org/nab/bible/index.htm
.