Why I reject fatima

  • Thread starter Thread starter someperson555
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
A lot of my statements were just my opinion. Yes, a lot of them are a tangent to Fatima itself. I have no reason to believe the eyewitnesses were lying. If we can believe what 12 guys saw 2000 years ago, then we can believe what 70,000 people saw 100 years ago (many of whom were atheists who had come out to mock the whole affair).

I was simply talking about devotion to Our Lady of Fatima. My skepticism lies not with the events themselves, but the wild and often baseless speculations about this, that, and the other thing. So, by association, I had to distance myself from Fatima (without distancing myself from Mary, of course).

Let’s put it this way: Fatima devotion got me into the culture wars, of which I now have PTSD. It gave me the impression that the world is royally fudged if I don’t say enough rosaries or do good enough penances. It made me scrupulous and constanly worried that the fate of the world depends on my actions.
Yeah, these people have a very narrow and distorted view of the world and of history. Socialism is not a bad thing. In fact the early Christians were basically socialists. But these people mix religion with culture and tradition. That leads them to be blind to new ideas and scared of anything unfamiliar. The world is actually no better or worse now than it was a thousand years ago. There was always killing and slavery and sex slavery and homosexuality.
 
Precisely. Especially when numerous people all report seeing different things. The power of suggestion is a very powerful thing. So I guess all those people who see the virgin Mary in their toast have experienced a genuine miracle :rolleyes:
I know an old lady at my parish who claims to see her deceased husband and relatives during mass. But she is clearly not normal, you can tell shes highly suggestable and just plain mentally ill. She has an equally wierd old lady friend who claims to be a " sensitive" and that once her dead dog came back to visit her. :D. I mean COME ON, are you serious? The atheists are right to demand evidence. Look, I think that many times people who claim to have visions are just very imaginitive and depressed and disconnected from life. They crave excitement so they imagine talking to saints and angels with fire and brimstone messages.
I don’t know what I said in my post that makes you think I equate the miracle at Fatima with seeing Mary in a piece of toast. And the experiences you mentioned are not even close to thousands of people witnessing the same vision.

Personally, I don’t have a particular devotion to any Marian apparition. My point was simply this: if the church, the one you profess to believe in, has, after careful (and may I say skeptical) investigations, sanctioned a vision, you are out of line in trying to convince your fellow Catholics otherwise.
 
you either accept it or you don’t. For a start why would 70,000 people want to stare at the sun? Secondly if you stare at the sun for more than ten seconds, you’ll start to permanently damage your eye sight. This means there should have been 70,000 people with eye problems, but there were no reports of that. One of the things that was stated was that people could stare at the sun and it didn’t hurt. That’s odd in itself.

ewtn.com/fatima/apparitions/october.htm
if this is true then i believe.
 
You need to read “Meet the Witnesses” by John Haffert. The author went to Portugal in 1960 to interview any surviving witnesses to the Miracle. He placed an ad in the newspapers asking anyone who was there in Fatima that day to come forward to be interviewed. He had thousands of responses. He interviewed hundreds of them. He asked all of them the same questions. One question was, “Are you aware of anyone who was there in the Cova that day, who DID NOT see anything?” Every single one of the witnesses replied, “No”. As far as they knew, everyone who was there that day saw the sun dance.
I’ll second this - I have this book and it is great!
 
I see some pretty disturbing comments about the Apparitions of Our Lady of Fatima here. I’ll leave you with this. Never has any pope condemned this particular apparition. Quite the opposite…high praise! Most have visited there, and the Church always celebrates enthusiastically the anniversary of this event. St. Pope John Paul ll is convinced that it was in fact Our Lady herself who spared his life in the assassination attempt on him which happened on May 13, 1981, the 64th anniversary of the first apparition of the Virgin Mary to the three shepherd children in Fatima. In fact, John Paul gave the bullet that was taken from his abdomen to the shrine in Fatima; that bullet now forms part of the crown of the statue of the Virgin of Fatima. The Church has always accepted this apparition, like Lourdes before it, to be genuine. I also am not aware of any theologian that condemns the apparitions at Fatima. Fatima wannabes…Fatima fanatics? My suggestion would be to stear clear of these sensationalist sites that make these doomsday prophesies, and stick with authentic sites such as here, here, and
here.

Peace, Mark
 
I was staring at the sun and guess what. I saw psychedelic rainbow colors like the people reported in fatima and as I stared longer the sun seemed to zigzag as I moved my eyes. So. Dont you think THATS what the spectators at fatima saw?

Ask yourself, what are the fruits of fatima? (…)It only fuels the fire for these ultra trad zealots to remain in their errors. Vatican 2 was a very GOOD and necessary thing. It clarified many of the church’s teaching s and therefore cleared up many misconceptions. Im sorry but im going to take the word of the church over the words of a phantom any day. Its as the bible says: " if an angel should come down from heaven and teach something other than the word, let him be damned".
I’ve stared at the sun when I was a child, and as far as I remember I saw no rainbows, just the image of the sun repeating itself in different points. Its the same if you look for some time at a lamp. When you move your eyes the lamp / sun moves as well. And no I don’t think that’s what people saw. I think they really witnessed something out of the ordinary.

The fruits of Fátima I see them everyday. Portugal has a little more than 10 million people, and about 80% of those people identify themselves as Roman Catholic. Faith is the biggest fruit from Fátima. Conspiracy theories are just that. Theories for those who wish to be part of a group of special people who think they know the real “Truth” about everything.

So you trust the church concerning the Vatican II but not so much about the Fatima apparitions being worth of belief. Mind you, I’m not catholic (yet) but I thought catholics didn’t pick and choose what the Church teached / deemed worth of. I don’t want to be offensive or anything of the sort I just don’t understand your reasoning. 🤷
 
I mentioned before that the people stared at the sun. Here’s a photo of them doing so.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miracle_of_the_Sun#mediaviewer/File:People_looking_miracle_sun.jpg

There are a number of photos of people staring at the sun at Fatima, and since cameras would have been rare in Portugal of that time, somebody came prepared.

google.com.au/search?q=photographs+of+people+staring+at+the+sun+at+Fatima&biw=1366&bih=589&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ei=P6WvVPaRKouK8QXv14HQAw&ved=0CBwQsAQ

Likewise I also mentioned it had rained for hours. This appears to be a photo taken of the crowd before the “sun episode”.

bookofdaystales.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/sun6.jpg
 
The supposed " miracle" itself wasnt very impressive. It can very easily be explained by non divine causes. I think it can be attributed to auto suggestion. I mean consider the fact that those over zealous spectators were WAITING for a miracle. And interestingly they only saw something AFTER lucia pointed at the Sun and said " look the sun". :rolleyes:

The hypothesis of auto suggestion is further backed up by the fact that everyone saw something DIFFERENT. (Some saw nothing at all) that indicates that the alleged " miracle" was probably just mass hysteria.
Second, moving on to the supposed “secrets” . Isnt it suspicious that they were written down and revealed AFTER the events took place? ( ill get to the third “secret” later).
Heres what I think really happened at fatima and why. Lets take a look at Lucias personal and family life. People said that lucias father was overly religious to the point of being mentally ill. Furthermore it is also revealed that he had some dislike towards the local priest. And vice versa. So much so that they went to the parish in the neighboring town! Hmm dont you think it wouldve benefitted him if all of a sudden his daughter would recieve " messages" from the blessed virgin? Ill bet that he thought that would show that priest how “holy” his family is. Another suspicious thing is that lucias FATHER took her to the alleged apparition sites EVEN after her mother forbade it. The picture is coming together now, isn’t it?
So thus in conclusion I think fatima is a man made fabrication. But youre probably thinking why I posted this. Well I see a troubling trend among catholics to just blindly believe ANY claim of an apparition or miracle. Further more I dont think its good that theres so many versions of the virgin Mary. Theres only ONE virgin. No lady of akita, no lady of this and that. Second if you examine the alleged apparitions words at fatima they are quite alarming. The virgin Mary seems to repeatedly keep glorifying herself. “God wants to establish a devotion to MY heart”. She also never talks about leading people to God. It seems she wants people to trust in HER and not God. As for the third secret, remember the bible verse: " beware of false prophets, YOU WILL KNOW THEM BY THEIR FRUITS" well the third secret has only caused discord in the church. It has only caused people to distrust the church. Usually all these apparitions claiming corruption of the church are very suspicious. YhThe REAL virgin Mary would never reveal information that is damaging to the church or that would harnm the faith of the faithful.
http://yourdivineinspirations.net/w...kimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/4e/Zeitun.gif
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Our_Lady_of_Zeitoun
google.com/search?q=Our+Lady+of+Zeitoun&es_sm=93&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ei=nHehVOjrBpeioQShnYDADA&ved=0CAgQ_AUoAQ&biw=853&bih=560
youtube.com/watch?
 
Having said that, my great grandmother was present at Fatima, and unlike when you look at the sun directly and your eyes start to hurt because it starts burning your retina (that’s why you don’t look into the sun through a telescope), her account was that it didn’t hurt at all, that when the clouds disappeared and Lucia said “Look at the sun” the sun started to move weirdly or “dancing” as you will find it over the internet. She was a religious person, thus she attributed it to God. Some people who she knew that were not all so convinced, became a lot more devout or even converted on the spot. And then there were the people who saw “Nothing” because well let’s be honest here. It suits them better. 🤷
Whatever some people “saw”, it must have been in their mind. As we all know, the sun doesn’t move and the motion of the sun is caused by the earth rotating on its axis. Nothing has happened to the earth’s rotation and people on half the planet (the half which had daylight) didn’t notice anything unusual happening to the image of the sun.

So there wasn’t anything “physical” happening. When we talk about a miracle, does it only imply some physical change, which we can test and measure independently, such as the healing of a person, or do we include perceptions which are not verifiable?
 
Whatever some people “saw”, it must have been in their mind. As we all know, the sun doesn’t move and the motion of the sun is caused by the earth rotating on its axis. Nothing has happened to the earth’s rotation and people on half the planet (the half which had daylight) didn’t notice anything unusual happening to the image of the sun.

So there wasn’t anything “physical” happening. When we talk about a miracle, does it only imply some physical change, which we can test and measure independently, such as the healing of a person, or do we include perceptions which are not verifiable?
👍
 
what about guadalupe?
Im on the fence about guadalupe and akita. Please understand im not trying to play the skeptic here. I just really think that we as Catholics should be ultra cautious before believing any claim of an apparition.
Right now im still leaning towards disbelieving fatima. However if it is indeed true that even people miles away from the crowd noticed unusual solar activity, then I believe.
 
Im on the fence about guadalupe and akita. Please understand im not trying to play the skeptic here. I just really think that we as Catholics should be ultra cautious before believing any claim of an apparition.
Right now im still leaning towards disbelieving fatima. However if it is indeed true that even people miles away from the crowd noticed unusual solar activity, then I believe.
O my Jesus, forgive us our sins, save us from the fires of hell, lead all souls to Heaven, especially those most in need of Thy mercy. Amen. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fatima_Prayers

One of the things that came out of Fatima was this prayer to add to the Rosary would this have happen if these apparitions came from the devil ?
 
[SIGN][/SIGN]
O my Jesus, forgive us our sins, save us from the fires of hell, lead all souls to Heaven, especially those most in need of Thy mercy. Amen. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fatima_Prayers

One of the things that came out of Fatima was this prayer to add to the Rosary would this have happen if these apparitions came from the devil ?
Ah! Valid point, valid point. Unclean spirits do not call us to holiness.

I see both sides of the issue here. I find the arguments for the events at Fatima themselves convincing. And considering the children were mocked and antagonized for their claims, I don’t think they were lying.

At the same time, apparitions are not required for Catholics to believe. I think healthy skepticism is necessary, lest we be hoodwinked by charlatans. I wouldn’t put it past someone to exploit such a thing for money, fame, etc.
 
Whatever some people “saw”, it must have been in their mind. As we all know, the sun doesn’t move and the motion of the sun is caused by the earth rotating on its axis. Nothing has happened to the earth’s rotation and people on half the planet (the half which had daylight) didn’t notice anything unusual happening to the image of the sun.

So there wasn’t anything “physical” happening. When we talk about a miracle, does it only imply some physical change, which we can test and measure independently, such as the healing of a person, or do we include perceptions which are not verifiable?
Our Lady never said the miracle would be seen by the entire daylight world… The Miracle was seen in Cova da Moura (Fátima) and some people report seeing the event from some miles away. I’m pretty sure if it was God’s Will he could make the sun movement visible in just a certain radius, since he is Almighty, Physics don’t have to apply. Likewise, those atheists that are waiting for a Biological / natural explanation for Jesus Ressurection are not going to get it. That is why it’s called a Miracle or a supernatural phenomenon.
 
Im on the fence about guadalupe and akita. Please understand im not trying to play the skeptic here. I just really think that we as Catholics should be ultra cautious before believing any claim of an apparition.
Right now im still leaning towards disbelieving fatima. However if it is indeed true that even people miles away from the crowd noticed unusual solar activity, then I believe.
The dancing sun at Fatima was an apparition for the benefit of the people there. It wasn’t seen on the Western Front. It was still miraculous on two counts - they all saw it and it wasn’t a mass hallucination. The other miraculous aspect was that people could stare fixedly at the sun and it didn’t hurt their eyes.

The sudden, almost instantaneous drying of ground and clothes after hours of rain was also miraculous, an event which would normally require an enormous amount of energy, but it was a local miracle.

But so were Christ’s miracles - local. The wedding at Cana was a local wedding. The cursed fig tree was a single tree. Lazarus was a single man with a local family. Only the disciples witnessed Him walking on the water. Only they witnessed Him telling the storm to “be quiet”. Any other passer-by may have been struck by the suddenness of the storm stopping, but they would not have been aware of the cause.

If you’re not prepared to accept Fatima with 70,000 witnesses (and circumstantial evidence in the form of photos) from 98 years ago, then why are you prepared to accept 12 witnesses to Christ’s miracles from nearly 2000 years ago? Even fewer in the case of the empty tomb.

Once again, you’ll either believe it or you won’t. I do.

I also think it’s a judgment on a divided church.
 
I have no use for apparitions, especially when they advance political action – or at least people become politically active and claim it’s because Mary wants us to.

The last thing Mary said, as far as I’m concerned, that’s binding on me, is “do what He says.” And He never said to believe in a bunch of other people’s visions about His mother advocating political action.

And plus I don’t hear anything coming out of it that is transformational in the way that I believe Jesus most wanted us transformed. Our treasure in the things of the kingdom; not in our efforts to control worldly powers. And certainly getting people all ginned up about world events is contrary to what Jesus said; that is these things will happen and they will get worse, but that we should be at peace – not “we will not rest until things are right.”

Correct me if I’m wrong; and there is nothing in the content in any “approved” apparition that calls us to go to Caesar to do the work of God.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top