Why is God so mean?

  • Thread starter Thread starter PJM
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I don’t worship anything. I’m curious about why you assume that we have to worship something.
To worship is to value something more than anything else in the world. It is impossible not to value anything. Otherwise you would not value your opinion or bother to express it! I leave you to decide what your supreme value is…
 
You are assuming pain, death and solitude are directly inflicted by God. Even the archsceptic David Hume recognized that God is not the cause of evil, either moral or natural.
Right, because Hume believed that God did not exist. If this is not what you meant, show me the quote, I’d be interested in seeing it. Although I greatly respect the opinion of David Hume, I do not necessarily agree with all the opinions of him, or any other atheist. Atheists make mistakes too, and I look at the quality of the arguments, not just who is making them.

If God exists, he is definitely the cause of natural evil. He created the entire universe and the laws of nature. He could have easily made the laws such that natural evil did not exist, since he is omnipotent. So how could God not be the cause of natural evil?
 
To worship is to value something more than anything else in the world. It is impossible not to value anything. Otherwise you would not value your opinion or bother to express it! I leave you to decide what your supreme value is…
This is not how the word ‘worship’ is typically defined. It is typically defined as something like this: the reverent love and devotion accorded a deity, an idol, or a sacred object or the ceremonies, prayers, or other religious forms by which this love is expressed. I value many things in this world: my life, the life of my family, and the lives and happiness of every person and animal on earth. But I do not think it would be appropriate to say that I worship anything.

If you allow someone to use definitions that are different from how the words are normally used, you can get people to say very incorrect things. For example, if I defined God as Zeus, then you would say that you don’t believe in God. But people would not interpret it as meaning disbelief in Zeus if you said: “I don’t believe in God.” Furthermore, if you defined the word ‘babies’ the same as the word ‘pizza’, then you could get me to say that I enjoy eating babies. I think we should just stick to commonly accepted meanings for words instead of trying to redefine them in every conversation.
 
How do you know that? Have you ever created a universe? 🙂
I have described some ways in which God could reduce the amount of evil in the world. God is all powerful, so there can be no additional constraints on him. God would have even created the laws of how universes behave. So he could have created universes in whatever way he wanted.
 
=anEvilAtheist;5319158]If God made the natural laws, he could have made them whatever he wanted (he would not have been constrained by the way matter behaves in our universe). He could have made the world the same as it is now, except without any natural disasters.
“EvilAtheist” you may not know it but your “bride” is PRIDE!

Yes He could have, wanna take a guess at why He did not?

Love and prayers,
 
“EvilAtheist” you may not know it but your “bride” is PRIDE!

Yes He could have, wanna take a guess at why He did not?

Love and prayers,
No, I’m not sure which of the various possible reasons you like. I am not saying that all evil cannot be consistent with an omnibenevolent God; I’m just saying that I think there are particularly problematic types of evil which an omnibenevolent God could not cause or permit.

By the way, I’m curious what makes you think my “bride is pride”. I think I’m generally pretty humble about the fact that there’s tons of stuff that I don’t know.
 
*If God made the natural laws, he could have made them whatever he wanted (he would not have been constrained by the way matter behaves in our universe). He could have made the world the same as it is now, except without any natural disasters. *

But to return to the point you made before, if there is no God, then the universe is really the villain, isn’t it, because now you have no one else to blame for natural disasters but the universe. Either way, you are going to blame someone or something for a less than perfect world. Do you ever think about whether people bring on their own personal evils, and that Christ has offered every ounce of his own blood to help them overcome their own personal evils? Why does the prospect of hell grieve you so much when the prospect of heaven earned by God’s grace and your own free will should fill you with hope and joy?

That perfect world you are pining for exists, but you have to earn it. You can also earn the other world that is opposed to perfection … hell. That is an existential choice you have to make … and I think at the hour of your death you just might be singing a rather different tune about natural disasters … what with the possible personal disaster looming straight ahead for anEvilAtheist. 😉

What say you?
 
I think I’m generally pretty humble about the fact that there’s tons of stuff that I don’t know.

That’s not the point. Are you generally pretty humble about the tons of stuff you do know?
 
*If God made the natural laws, he could have made them whatever he wanted (he would not have been constrained by the way matter behaves in our universe). He could have made the world the same as it is now, except without any natural disasters. *

But to return to the point you made before, if there is no God, then the universe is really the villain, isn’t it, because now you have no one else to blame for natural disasters but the universe.
I guess you could call the universe the villain, although there is certainly too much good in the world to see it as pure evil. However, I generally don’t like blaming things on inanimate objects. I might be upset when the weather is bad, but I don’t see that as the weather being evil.
Either way, you are going to blame someone or something for a less than perfect world. Do you ever think about whether people bring on their own personal evils,
Many people do. I think that most of our suffering is brought on by our own decisions. However, I do not think that all people who grow up in war-torn countries in a state of near starvation brought on their own suffering.
and that Christ has offered every ounce of his own blood to help them overcome their own personal evils? Why does the prospect of hell grieve you so much when the prospect of heaven earned by God’s grace and your own free will should fill you with hope and joy?
It’s just that based on everything I’ve read, there doesn’t seem to be any good evidence that Jesus died for our sins or that heaven and hell exist.
That perfect world you are pining for exists, but you have to earn it. You can also earn the other world that is opposed to perfection … hell. That is an existential choice you have to make … and I think at the hour of your death you just might be singing a rather different tune about natural disasters … what with the possible personal disaster looming straight ahead for anEvilAtheist. 😉

What say you?
On a personal level, I’m not very concerned about heaven and hell because Christianity in general seems pretty implausible to me (for a variety of reasons). But we’ll both be in trouble if the true God is something else entirely. 😉
 
I think I’m generally pretty humble about the fact that there’s tons of stuff that I don’t know.

That’s not the point. Are you generally pretty humble about the tons of stuff you do know?
I would say that I’m humble about that as well. In fact, I’m probably the most humble person who has ever lived. 😉

But more seriously, I recognize that the amount of stuff that I know is only a miniscule portion of all that there is to know. And even the things I say I “know”, I don’t know with 100% certainty. I realize that my own existence is about the only thing that I can be completely certain of. This is why I see myself as an agnostic atheist. But the non-existence of the Christian God is one of the things that I am more confident of. I could be wrong, just as I could be wrong about the Greek gods not existing, but in the end all we can do is use the minds that we have to try to get as close to the truth as we can. And if there is a benevolent God, I doubt he would punish me for my honest search for the truth.
 
anEvilAtheist

*And if there is a benevolent God, I doubt he would punish me for my honest search for the truth. *

No, God will not punish anyone for an honest search, if it is honest. The question is, and always must be, Have I been honest? You admit that you may be wrong about the Christian God? You admit that maybe instead of you judging God for his benevolence, you concede that it is God who must judge you for yours? You are convinced it is highly improbable that there is a God? Is that an intellectual conviction, or just a personal preference?

My experience talking with most atheists is that they are not absolutely certain there is no God, yet they are not willing to give God the benefit of the doubt. To me this suggests that disbelief in God is rooted more in the will and in the emotions than in the intellect. When the atheist realizes why he does not want God to exist, the objection against God’s so-called lack of benevolence will begin to collapse. Then the real focus that is needed and necessary, the focus on one’s own benevolence, begins to emerge. And then the real wrestling match begins!

Consider that God will judge us for the exercise of our free will. God does not force anyone into hell, if hell is our choice. In that sense God is truly benevolent. What he does say is that the choice is ours to make, and he will honor our choice, and we should have no complaint when the choice is made and the judgment is due. Christ is very up front about this, and there is no way to avoid his meaning: that there can be no honesty in denying him.

“Everyone who acknowledges me before others I will acknowledge before my heavenly Father. But whoever denies me before others, I will deny before my heavenly Father.” Matthew 10:32-33
 
=anEvilAtheist;5320093]No, I’m not sure which of the various possible reasons you like. I am not saying that all evil cannot be consistent with an omnibenevolent God; I’m just saying that I think there are particularly problematic types of evil which an omnibenevolent God could not cause or permit.
Two very good questions so I will address both:)

Nothing can exist outsidw the perview and Divine Providence of God, who is “The First Cause” of everything and everyone. additionally, this same God by virture of being The Creator" actually keeps all CREATED THINGS moving and in existence.

So all Good is directly or indirectly caused by God, and all evil is permitted by God, at times for reasons only God Himself is able to understand.

Isaiah 55:8 "For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways, says the LORD. 9 For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways and my thoughts than your thoughts."
By the way, I’m curious what makes you think my “bride is pride”. I think I’m generally pretty humble about the fact that there’s tons of stuff that I don’t know.
Sorry it sounded too personal:blush:

But lack of understanding is driven by and through ones pride. It is therefore the favorite tool of Satan, who takes advantage of one who is willing to accept that they may know more and know better.

I suspect that truth can only be discovered through great humility, which is NOT a natural attribute, but a gift from God to be sought along with Wisdom.🙂

Love and prayers,

Pat
 
Right, because Hume believed that God did not exist. If this is not what you meant, show me the quote, I’d be interested in seeing it. Although I greatly respect the opinion of David Hume, I do not necessarily agree with all the opinions of him, or any other atheist. Atheists make mistakes too, and I look at the quality of the arguments, not just who is making them.

If God exists, he is definitely the cause of natural evil. He created the entire universe and the laws of nature. He could have easily made the laws such that natural evil did not exist, since he is omnipotent. So how could God not be the cause of natural evil?
He is not the direct cause. He permits evil because the only alternative would be not to create beings with free will. Would you prefer never to have existed? Even if you said “yes” why should everyone else be deprived of the opprtunity because of your lack of appreciation?🙂
 
anEvilAtheist

*On a personal level, I’m not very concerned about heaven and hell because Christianity in general seems pretty implausible to me (for a variety of reasons). But we’ll both be in trouble if the true God is something else entirely. *

We agree? If Jesus Christ is not God, I prefer there would be no god. Any other god would not be near so compassionate and forgiving. As you say, we’d “both be in trouble”! :bigyikes::bigyikes:
 
Originally Posted by anEvilAtheist
Right, because Hume believed that God did not exist. If this is not what you meant, show me the quote, I’d be interested in seeing it. Although I greatly respect the opinion of David Hume, I do not necessarily agree with all the opinions of him, or any other atheist. Atheists make mistakes too, and I look at the quality of the arguments, not just who is making them.
If God exists, he is definitely the cause of natural evil. He created the entire universe and the laws of nature. He could have easily made the laws such that natural evil did not exist, since he is omnipotent. So how could God not be the cause of natural evil
God is the “cause” of “Natural Evil” is a very limited understanding of God.

God did create everything

God does keep everything in existence

God who is "All and only good perfectly" could prevent SOME disasters, bit please note that I did not include the word “natural.” Why is this?

A majority of “Natural disasters” are seen and perceived by humanity, on the basis of how they effect humanity. IF these same disasters took place in an area uninhabited by humanity, we would hardly take notice. So does God make people live where they freely choose to live? If you live by the sea, should one not expect, floods hurricanes ECT? If one builds on the cliffs in California and knows about the rainy season, who is at fault if there is a mud slide?

It seems to me we are quick to blame God for our own stupidity, greed, choices, but reluctant to give Him Credit, for any good.

There is a natural cycle of regeneration world wide that takes place, ice periods come and go, fires cause by lightning are for a reason, as are floods and the like.

Earth has existed for eons, and is still doing just fine, despite our efforts to screw it up, thank you very much.

But lets not blame God for our choices, why its un-Godly!
 
anEvilAtheist

*And if there is a benevolent God, I doubt he would punish me for my honest search for the truth. *

No, God will not punish anyone for an honest search, if it is honest. The question is, and always must be, Have I been honest? You admit that you may be wrong about the Christian God? You admit that maybe instead of you judging God for his benevolence, you concede that it is God who must judge you for yours? You are convinced it is highly improbable that there is a God? Is that an intellectual conviction, or just a personal preference?
I think there is no good evidence that the Christian God exists. So I think his existence is about as likely as the existence of any other conceivable God.
My experience talking with most atheists is that they are not absolutely certain there is no God, yet they are not willing to give God the benefit of the doubt.
I do not think it would be proper to say that it is impossible for some specific non-logically contradictory God to exist, and there are versions of the Christian God that are not logically contradictory. That doesn’t mean I think there is a decent probability that Christianity is correct. I am not willing to give the Christian conception of God the benefit of the doubt, and I am unwilling to give the Flying Spaghetti Monster the benefit of the doubt (since the probability of either one existing is incredibly small).
To me this suggests that disbelief in God is rooted more in the will and in the emotions than in the intellect. When the atheist realizes why he does not want God to exist, the objection against God’s so-called lack of benevolence will begin to collapse. Then the real focus that is needed and necessary, the focus on one’s own benevolence, begins to emerge. And then the real wrestling match begins!
I’m sure that some people don’t want to believe, and that contributes to their disbelief. Not for me. I just haven’t seen any reasons to think that Christianity is true.
Consider that God will judge us for the exercise of our free will. God does not force anyone into hell, if hell is our choice. In that sense God is truly benevolent. What he does say is that the choice is ours to make, and he will honor our choice, and we should have no complaint when the choice is made and the judgment is due. Christ is very up front about this, and there is no way to avoid his meaning: that there can be no honesty in denying him.

“Everyone who acknowledges me before others I will acknowledge before my heavenly Father. But whoever denies me before others, I will deny before my heavenly Father.” Matthew 10:32-33
So do you think I would rather spend eternity in hell then heaven?
 
Two very good questions so I will address both:)

Nothing can exist outsidw the perview and Divine Providence of God, who is “The First Cause” of everything and everyone. additionally, this same God by virture of being The Creator" actually keeps all CREATED THINGS moving and in existence.

So all Good is directly or indirectly caused by God, and all evil is permitted by God, at times for reasons only God Himself is able to understand.

Isaiah 55:8 "For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways, says the LORD. 9 For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways and my thoughts than your thoughts."
But if God is all powerful, there can be no constraints on God’s power. So God could prevent some incidents of evil and still achieve all the beneficial side-effects of that evil by some non-evil means.
Sorry it sounded too personal:blush:

But lack of understanding is driven by and through ones pride. It is therefore the favorite tool of Satan, who takes advantage of one who is willing to accept that they may know more and know better.
Well, you think your idea of God is closer to the truth than the ideas of every other religion (otherwise I presume you would be a member of another religion). Maybe a demon is making you think you think that you know better than Muslims, and maybe Islam is actually correct.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top