M
Melchior
Guest
Who said anything about a fossil? Not me. A fossil can not be observed in the sense we sare using. Why is there no living transitional species or even ahistorical record of them in all of human history? This alone is highly suspect. And why were ancient bats always just bats according to the fossil record? You are confusing random fossils as proof of transitional species. Fossils are not observable phenomena. Your definition of evidence is, respectfully, deficient.Apparently giving you what you ask for is not going to work. We have repeatedly given you instances of one species branching out into others. It has been observed. We’ve told you where & how. That’s as “transitional” as evolution gets.
Since this isn’t working, why don’t you tell us some example of what a “transitional” fossil is? I suspect that you still misunderstand the science. There really is no such thing as a “transitional” fossil — what are you really looking for? What is an example of some observation that you would say, “Aha! Now that is a transitional fossil!”
Plus, why do Paleantologists (tons of them) find the evolutionary fossil record so suspect?
I gotta go, I am having lunch with a Piltdown man now.
Merry Christmas,
Mel