T
tata888
Guest
Why is it so easy for western churches to lose their traditions when the eastern churches can hold onto theirs for such a long time?
Like what, for example?Why is it so easy for western churches to lose their traditions when the eastern churches can hold onto theirs for such a long time?
I’ve seen all of those things practiced regularly. Maybe other chaplets not as much, but the rosary, stations of the cross and Adoration are still pretty common practices.Like the rosary, chaplets, Stations of the Cross, Eucharistic Adoration, reverence…
What? Just sayin.
But in all seriousness, we have had fifty years of ‘sexual revolution’. Not a small problem.
(And above traditions may just be temporarily mispleaced, (never lost!) in the area that I live.)
I object to the “Lost” part.I object to the “so easy” part of the question.![]()
No offense, but this is a superficial comment. Have you been to an Eastern Church? We have our own problems with our own traditions, don’t think we have been immune. We have not.Why is it so easy for western churches to lose their traditions when the eastern churches can hold onto theirs for such a long time?
Thank you for this,No offense, but this is a superficial comment. Have you been to an Eastern Church? We have our own problems with our own traditions, don’t think we have been immune. We have not.
I think people think just because the Byzantine Churches have used the same Liturgy from 400AD means that we have preserved traditions really well. There is a long list of problems and if one would spend some time in Eastern Catholic forums (such as the one here at CAF or at ByzCath) one would easily realize that there are many traditions that has been given up or lost through time. Even the Orthodox are not immune, nobody is. Remember that the Church, for a long time, existed within the Holy Roman Empire, an absolute monarchy dedicated to the faith. That no longer exists and everyone today is subject to a largely secular world. We live in a time similar to the time before Constantine the Great, where there are persecutions (literal physical torture and death in the Middle East of Christians, and the anti-Christian policies of the Western World) and the Church has no backing whatsoever from any government or superpower.Thank you for this,![]()
The problems of the Eastern Churches go beyond Latinizations. I’ve seen concessions made to placate parishioners and sacrifice tradition. Latinization has nothing to do with it. Some feel that its better to sacrifice tradition rather than drive some out of the Church. I don’t know, I can understand if its done because of ekonomia. But often it becomes a precedent.Indeed, the Eastern Church has been through their trials like the Latin Church.
The eastern Churches have been increasingly Latinised the past century or so, and unfortunately, are losing their traditions which are distinctly eastern (I hesitate to group the 22 sui juris churches into Eastern, because they are all their own, but to save time)…
Lately, the churches have been gaining bck their traditions and are slowly de-Latinising.
The Latin Church has not lost it’s traditions, but they HAVE been shoved into a corner by the progressive and leftist lot that came about in the 70’s and 80’s. Haven’t you noticed though, that lately they’ve been emerging more and more? Traditions are not lost, it’s the people who put them away.
Thank you. You said what I wanted to say but better.Others have already mentioned that the “problem” of “losing tradition” is present in every Church, so I won’t go into that. I would like to propose a somewhat different perspective, though:
All of us, and especially traditionalists, tend to look at the past with rose-tinted glasses. There is a tendency not to recognize that what is considered “traditional” now was at some point in time new and revolutionary. Gregorian Chant, for instance, was not around at the time of Christ… in fact Latin chants were not used at all in the time of Christ.
The Catholic Church (more so than the Orthodox) has always advocated for a sort of “development” of doctrine and theology, wherein the initial deposit of the faith is reinterpreted as circumstances in the world change while still remaining true to the fundamentals of the faith.
For instance, it was “traditional” in the Middle Ages to receive communion only a few times a year. That is no longer the case, and I think all but the must staunch traditionalists would agree that that is a good thing.
So my two cents is simply to avoid looking at the past with rose-tinted glasses, while still revering traditional practice as a valuable method of worship.
Can you give an example of failure due to non-flexibility? I’m curious.Thank you. You said what I wanted to say but better.
I cannot say whether or not we have advocated for ‘development’ more than the Orthodox since I have no knowledge about how flexible the Orthodox are historically or even at present.
The Catholic flexibility in it rituals has been helpful in converting many different peoples, though. From the Americas to Africa and Papua New Guinea even to India and China where we have adapted rituals (‘becoming all things to all people’ as Paul did) we have succeeded and where we have not adapted rituals we have failed. Care must be taken to avoid changing that which must not be changed, but I think as a whole we have succeeded remarkably.
I find it interesting with my limited knowledge of perspective. In my state, I don’t know the number of Eastern Catholic Churches, but I suspect they are fewer than the number of fingers on my hand. I summarize, that the issue of “traditions” is less for these churches, as there are simply more of these other churches. There is no further lack of tradition in the Latin Church, as there is in any other Catholic Church. I thank my Lord we are all the same!An interesting range of responses and reactions …
Here’s mine, FWIW.
Perhaps its not so much that the Latin Church has “lost” traditions, per se, but rather that a fair degree of variability in the form of worship in the Mass is manifested in the Ordinary Form in practice. This is sometimes equated with a “loss of tradition”.
There is a greater degree of stability in the liturgical celebrations of the Eastern Catholic Churches, but that does not mean that the Divine Liturgy is celebrated in a completely homogenous fashion from parish to parish. In fact, we often revel in the slight variations in chant one might here from region to region, especially in the Old Country, but also in the diaspora.