Why is Latin Mas always far away?

  • Thread starter Thread starter latingirl
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Man you guys are lucky! I cant imagine a latin mass within 2 hours. I live in the most populous area of my state. The nearest Latin mass in my diocese is offered about once a month 8 hours away in a different time zone! Or if it is snowy or bad weather you have to go through 3 states to get to it. Unless one attended the SSPX chapel near by. that would be about 45 minutes away.
 
When the EF was the only form, all parishes had it.

Now the OF is the (as the letters stand for) ordinary form.

There is no way of telling what most people want, because a very large number of them have never been exposed to the EF.

However, there is evidence that where the EF is offered, only a very small segment of those within a reasonable distance attend it. Part of that may be due to many attending the OF having no knowledge that the EF is offered reasonably close by.

Part of that is undoubtedly due to many simply preferring the OF.

Part of that may likely also due to people wanting to attend Mass with others whom they have come to know, and consdier as part of their family, if you will. People can become very attached to a parish. If they have to go to another parish, thank you they will stay in the one they are fgamiliar with.

For those who particularly prefer the EF, I have heard comments that they cannot understand why ogthers are not also attracted to it.

It may not be the best of analogies, but if one referred to music, in any given area where there is a symphony, only a very very small part of the population will attend. Why? Most don’t have a strong appreciation for the type of music most symphonies play.

So also, some are very attrated to Latin; and others do not want to attend a Mass that is in all Latin. That is not to get into a side issue of whether or not parts of the Mass, even in the vernacular, should be recited in Latin; the point is, they do not wnat to attend a Mass that is all in Latin; and that is probably more impoprtant to them than orientation, or specific rubrics, or canon said, or other issues.

And that is not likely to change, as the number of people who want a Mass in the EF seem to be a small minority.
This is all true. Certainly this describes the situation in our city, where we have had the Latin Mass since the 1990s. (offered daily, and several times on weekends). There is a small (around 400) and delightful group of Catholics who attend and are involved with the Latin Mass parish and school, but the vast majority of Catholics are happy attending OF Masses offered at their parishes.

I think that, as you say, parish love/loyalty transcends Mass form love/loyalty for most Catholics, at least in our area. We pay more attention to each other rather than the form of the Mass.

And I don’t think that most of us are as concerned about music, Latin, outward shows of reverence, dress code, etc. as some of the members of CAF seem to be. I know a lot of Catholics in my area who are much more concerned about casting off besetting sins, learning to be truly good and holy out in our unholy city, evangelizing others (especially beloved family members) to the Lord Jesus and the Church, becoming saints, and going to heaven than they are about whether or not the Mass contains any Latin. Different priorities, I guess.
 
This is all true. Certainly this describes the situation in our city, where we have had the Latin Mass since the 1990s. (offered daily, and several times on weekends). There is a small (around 400) and delightful group of Catholics who attend and are involved with the Latin Mass parish and school, but the vast majority of Catholics are happy attending OF Masses offered at their parishes.

I think that, as you say, parish love/loyalty transcends Mass form love/loyalty for most Catholics, at least in our area. We pay more attention to each other rather than the form of the Mass.

And I don’t think that most of us are as concerned about music, Latin, outward shows of reverence, dress code, etc. as some of the members of CAF seem to be. I know a lot of Catholics in my area who are much more concerned about casting off besetting sins, learning to be truly good and holy out in our unholy city, evangelizing others (especially beloved family members) to the Lord Jesus and the Church, becoming saints, and going to heaven than they are about whether or not the Mass contains any Latin. Different priorities, I guess.
Actually there are two reasons why I prefer Latin Mass and it’s not about appearances. I attended the OF for years and had no problem with it. First, it was the Latin Mass that drew me to the Catholic Church in the first place, when I was a non-nonpracticing Protestant. It opened my eyes to the Catholic Church and got me attending Mass and eventually I converted. Second, I am tired of seeing liturgical abuses and/or irregularities. I don’t like fearing what is going to happen during Mass because every church I go to the priest does something totally different, sometimes to the expense of reverence and honor to God during Mass. The likelihood of abuse and/or irregularities is smaller in the current Latin Masses… There, I can concentrate on honoring God and not worry about the priest forcing me to socialize with people. (I love socializing but hate being “forced” to at Mass when my mind should be on higher things)

The form of the Mass isn’t a shallow thing at all. It is a catechesis of the blessed life to come and sustenance for this life. Mass is a teaching. What are we being taught? I have been taught alot of the times that Mass is just social, happy time, it is just a celebration and nothing else. While Mass is celebration, it is also Calvary, a re-representation of Jesus’s sacrifice. Do we clap and sing secular songs at the cross? Everything the priest does up there is a teaching. What are we being taught about Jesus’s sacrifice through the form? To some people, the form of the liturgy teaches us to be saints.

We all have different and totally legitimate reasons for preferring Latin Mass.
I don’t think it’s right for you to assume us Latin Mass folks are more about appearances then fixing ourselves or becoming saints.
 
Actually there are two reasons why I prefer Latin Mass and it’s not about appearances. I attended the OF for years and had no problem with it. First, it was the Latin Mass that drew me to the Catholic Church in the first place, when I was a non-nonpracticing Protestant. It opened my eyes to the Catholic Church and got me attending Mass and eventually I converted. Second, I am tired of seeing liturgical abuses and/or irregularities. I don’t like fearing what is going to happen during Mass because every church I go to the priest does something totally different, sometimes to the expense of reverence and honor to God during Mass. The likelihood of abuse and/or irregularities is smaller in the current Latin Masses… There, I can concentrate on honoring God and not worry about the priest forcing me to socialize with people. (I love socializing but hate being “forced” to at Mass when my mind should be on higher things)

We all have different and totally legitimate reasons for preferring Latin Mass.
I don’t think it’s right for you to assume us Latin Mass folks are more about appearances then fixing ourselves or becoming saints.
Are there any monasteries near you? I think you’ll find that in most monasteries (certainly Benedictine monasteries) the liturgy will be very consistent and free of liturgical errors, even in the OF. You’ll also be more likely to hear at least some Gregorian chant or vernacular plainchant. Monks as a rule are an obedient lot.

However do expect to find some liturgical differences between monasteries and parishes: different calendar, different traditions.
 
In my diocese in NJ, only the Shrine Chapel of the Blessed Sacrament has Latin Mass. I go there for Mass and leave my offering to that Mass. If more people start attending and supporting the Diocese at this Shrine, I figure they will know there is a demand for it.

Go where you have to go for the Latin Mass, they will see the need. I understand what the parishes are going through, with merging parishes and higher workload for the Priests. They also need training or refresher courses to properly say the Latin Mass. Encourage friends to go with you, spread the word.

At my home parish, they have many Masses, but in English and Spanish. If Latin had never been abandoned, English speakers and Spanish speakers could attend one Mass and not be segregated. To me it really does nothing for unity by having Mass in the vernacular. It is almost an unintended “Jim Crow” setting, separate, but equal. People who speak foreign languages would be helped to better themselves by learning the language where they live from other members and the sermons.

It is also nice to request it from time to time and get others to do so.
 
Are there any monasteries near you? I think you’ll find that in most monasteries (certainly Benedictine monasteries) the liturgy will be very consistent and free of liturgical errors, even in the OF. You’ll also be more likely to hear at least some Gregorian chant or vernacular plainchant. Monks as a rule are an obedient lot.

However do expect to find some liturgical differences between monasteries and parishes: different calendar, different traditions.
Oh goodness I wish!!! vernacular chant is beautiful. I don’t care what anyone says there!
 
In my diocese in NJ, only the Shrine Chapel of the Blessed Sacrament has Latin Mass. I go there for Mass and leave my offering to that Mass. If more people start attending and supporting the Diocese at this Shrine, I figure they will know there is a demand for it.

Go where you have to go for the Latin Mass, they will see the need. I understand what the parishes are going through, with merging parishes and higher workload for the Priests. They also need training or refresher courses to properly say the Latin Mass. Encourage friends to go with you, spread the word.

At my home parish, they have many Masses, but in English and Spanish. If Latin had never been abandoned, English speakers and Spanish speakers could attend one Mass and not be segregated. To me it really does nothing for unity by having Mass in the vernacular. It is almost an unintended “Jim Crow” setting, separate, but equal. People who speak foreign languages would be helped to better themselves by learning the language where they live from other members and the sermons.

It is also nice to request it from time to time and get others to do so.
I agree about the unity of language thing. It also was more helpful for travelers and pilgrims because no matter where they were, if they knew Latin, they could understand Mass. The Hispanics are separated from the others at my parish. Whenever we have a Mass together, it is a confused jumble of English and Spanish. I wish things were different.
 
Latin Girl, I can’t speak to Florida as I have never been there. But I have been to multiple parishes in North Dakota, Washington, Oregon, California and Utah and I have been amazed constantly that I can seem to find Masses in all of those states which are reverent, said properly, have no abuses, and don’t seem to match what I hear so often in these forums.

And none of those Masses were the EF; they were all the OF. Two of them, one in Portland and the other the cathedral in Salt Lake have had choirs which sang in Latin; the one in Portland singing works from Palistrina and the one in Salt Lake a children’s choir singning Gregorian chant.

Maybe I am just lucky.

Or maybe I just know the rubrics enough to know where there are variations allowed, and that they are not abuses (and I do not suggest that what you have seen were not). My own parish has the Mass in English, sings our of OCP hymnal, the vast majority receive in the hand, we use EMHCs and the parish has also had 24/7/363 Perpetual Adoration for something like well over 15 years.

There are times we suffer from irregularities.

There are other times we suffer from not having what we want.

Several years ago I came across information of where the EF was being celebrated; or rather, where the Mass was being celebrated in Latin (it was not entirely clear that the listings were only for the EF). Giving it the benefit of the doubt, I chose several dioceses that seemed to have a large number, and the best I could find was under Francis Cardinal George’s Archdiocese. That amounted to about 3%+ of the parishes and missions; and therre was no indication that any of them were EF only; so it is possible that out of all the Masses said in the Archdiocese on a Sunday, three tenths of one percent were the EF. That says to me that while a given EF might have a large attendance, it is rather miniscule in relation to the total attendance throughout the archdiocese. And that, in short, is why the parishes with an EF are so far apart; there simply is not enough interest to spread further, except very gradually.

That is not to say that there are not more people who want the EF; but they are scattered all over and that makes it hard to get anything moving.
 
My suspicion is that, given the circumstances of the present age, the TLM mainly appeals to intelligentsia. The hoi polloi don’t know it, don’t care about it, aren’t interested in it, and will probably get mad if it’s spoken of in their presence, so it falls to the patricians to organize and support them. Natural (Catholic) patricians are rare, so TLMs are rare, and they tend to be city-dwellers, so you tend to find TLMs in cities. For instance, in my diocese, there are three TLMs I’m aware of: two diocesan TLMs in Waco and Austin, and an SSPX mission in Austin. In nearby dioceses, there’s one in Dallas (FSSP parish), two in or just outside Houston (another FSSP parish and an elderly monsignor ordained pre-Vatican II), and I think one in San Antonio.

A secondary factor is age. Where there is preference for the TLM it seems to be motivated mainly by young people, probably an understandable reaction against the excesses of their parents’ generation. In my experience, if I walk into a parish and see an ocean of gray hair, I know I will hear nothing but Haas and Haugen that day; whereas, by contrast, every TLM I’ve been to was filled with folks my age or slightly younger, keeping a half-dozen kids in line.
I think you managed to insult most everyone. At least the hoi polloi, the older people, and the well educated. I am glad that you think that your generation is the cream of all humanity. Keep in mind that is what every young generation thought. God willing your turn will come when you are a sweet gray haired elderly person being ridiculed by those who should have been taught to respect and cherish their parents and their elders.
 
Are there any monasteries near you? I think you’ll find that in most monasteries (certainly Benedictine monasteries) the liturgy will be very consistent and free of liturgical errors, even in the OF. You’ll also be more likely to hear at least some Gregorian chant or vernacular plainchant. Monks as a rule are an obedient lot.
There’s a St. Procopius Abbey near me. (Lisle, Ill) I received my masters from the college there (Illinois Benedictine) but it’s been about 40 years since I attended Mass there. I’ll check it out again one of these days. If there is English chant, I might have to leave early. 🙂
 
I guess I’m lucky; I can walk to a Latin Mass in about 15 minutes.
 
To the OP

Why is the “Latin Mass” always far away? My own personal opinion on this is due to resistance from the bishops. Blessed Pope John Paul II asked bishops to be generous in providing Mass in the EF. They were not and there are many reports of where they actively obstructed its provision.

It was due to the lack of generosity in providing the EF that gave rise to Summorum Pontificum. Pope Benedict XVI made it very clear that any priest could celebrate the EF without the need for consent from his ordinary.

I can’t imagine that any bishop, after being overruled by the pontiff, is going to go out of his way to encourage and support the EF.
 
well guys, I tried to attend a Latin Mass within my diocese, found a church about 2 hours away and tried to drive there. It was so far and in an unfamiliar place, I couldn’t even find it. (not everyone has GPS).
/QUOTE]

FWIW, you could always look it up on Google Maps and print out the driving directions from your home. You could also do what I do–attend my own parish 3 weeks out of the month, and take a road trip for a Tridentine Mass on the other Sunday of each month. Although we are supposed to support our own parishes, I don’t think God begrudges us our liturgical tourism!

I’m recovering from back surgery, and can’t tolerate long drives right now. Once I build up my back strength, I’ll go back to doing that.

Unless, of course, we do get lucky with an assistant priest assigned from the new group that will be ordained in May. We really ought to: The consolidated parish has 3,000 families, and we’re the regional vicariate in this part of the diocese.

A side note: I’m a cradle Catholic, and have lived through V II, folk Masses (gick,) altar girls, and so forth. I’ve never seen an actual liturgical abuse committed by the celebrant, even though I’ve heard bad liturgical music badly performed, seen the felt banners (yuck,) and so forth. I’ve come to the realization that just because something at Mass is esthetically jarring, it isn’t liturgical abuse. I find that term batted about frequently, and sometimes wonder if people know what it actually means.

A second side note: The college I did my postgraduate work at had an elderly priest who celebrated the OF Mass in Latin. It reminded me a lot of the old Latin dialogue Mass, and I found that I really liked it from the sense of feeling more included by active participation. I believe this is the same format of the Mass that is broadcast daily on EWTN.
 
well guys, I tried to attend a Latin Mass within my diocese, found a church about 2 hours away and tried to drive there. It was so far and in an unfamiliar place, I couldn’t even find it. (not everyone has GPS).

Back then, even a poor, barefoot person without a car could walk to a Latin Mass. Now transportation and a full tank of gas are required to make it there. My question now is, why is what was once commonplace, now only a luxury for those who can afford to travel?
Sorry to hear about the travel issues. There is a Latin Mass in my area (in Fresno, California). It’s actually closer than the regular parish I attend. The parish that holds the Latin Mass was actually helped constructed by my now deceased grandfather-in-law decades ago.

I agree with those that say it’s because of the variety of religions. If Protestantism didn’t exist, every Christian church would be a Catholic church. What a wonderful thought that is. I pray that the Lord blesses you and people in your area with a parish that offers the Latin Mass as well. God bless.
 
Latin Girl, I can’t speak to Florida as I have never been there. But I have been to multiple parishes in North Dakota, Washington, Oregon, California and Utah and I have been amazed constantly that I can seem to find Masses in all of those states which are reverent, said properly, have no abuses, and don’t seem to match what I hear so often in these forums.

And none of those Masses were the EF; they were all the OF. Two of them, one in Portland and the other the cathedral in Salt Lake have had choirs which sang in Latin; the one in Portland singing works from Palistrina and the one in Salt Lake a children’s choir singning Gregorian chant.

Maybe I am just lucky.

Or maybe I just know the rubrics enough to know where there are variations allowed, and that they are not abuses (and I do not suggest that what you have seen were not). My own parish has the Mass in English, sings our of OCP hymnal, the vast majority receive in the hand, we use EMHCs and the parish has also had 24/7/363 Perpetual Adoration for something like well over 15 years.

There are times we suffer from irregularities.

There are other times we suffer from not having what we want.

Several years ago I came across information of where the EF was being celebrated; or rather, where the Mass was being celebrated in Latin (it was not entirely clear that the listings were only for the EF). Giving it the benefit of the doubt, I chose several dioceses that seemed to have a large number, and the best I could find was under Francis Cardinal George’s Archdiocese. That amounted to about 3%+ of the parishes and missions; and therre was no indication that any of them were EF only; so it is possible that out of all the Masses said in the Archdiocese on a Sunday, three tenths of one percent were the EF. That says to me that while a given EF might have a large attendance, it is rather miniscule in relation to the total attendance throughout the archdiocese. And that, in short, is why the parishes with an EF are so far apart; there simply is not enough interest to spread further, except very gradually.

That is not to say that there are not more people who want the EF; but they are scattered all over and that makes it hard to get anything moving.
I think you’ve brought up a good point in your final paragraph. If they belong to a denomination that doesn’t have a lot of adherents, many Protestants move to be able to attend a church and associate with people of that denomination.

E.g., the Reformed Church, which was once the largest Protestant denomination in the U.S., has dwindled over the years, and now many Reformed people live in one of three locations in the U.S. (Grand Rapids, Michigan, is one of those places, but I can’t remember the others. I know there’s one place in California where a lot of the Reformed live. Can’t even remember what state the other place is.)

And of course, we all know about the Amish and Mennonites. Many Fundamentalist Protestants also strive to live close to each other. And sometimes, Evangelicals move to be close to a particular church and group of believers.

It seems to me, from reading CAF, that so many Catholics who love the EF Mass experience actual suffering and pain, and are in danger of developing bitterness and discouragement, when they are forced to attend an OF Mass and sit through what they consider in their heart to be a “second-rate” Mass. Even if they admit intellectually that the OF Mass is equal to the EF Mass (which is what the Church teaches), emotionally, they just can’t bring themselves to believe that.

I understand that. I feel the same way about alcohol use by Christians. I admit in my head, with my brain, that it’s OK for Christians to drink. But in my HEART, I can’t accept it. I think it’s awful. So I try to choose not to be around when Christians are drinking. Sometimes I can’t get out of it, but usually, I can easily avoid parish picnics, dinners, etc, where there is drinking of alcohol.

And there’s also the issue of associating with and enjoying fellowship with like-minded people. To me, that’s almost as valuable as being able to attend the Mass of your choice. It’s a great thing when you don’t have be constantly in conflict with others, but rather, can be friends and work/play/pray side-by-side

I know that not everyone can move (e.g., teenagers and the elderly). But I think that a lot more people could move if they would sit down, pray hard, and then work out the knotty logistics. When my husband and I lived in North Carolina and wanted to move back to Northern Illinois (to be near family), we never thought it would happen. But one day, we just sat down and figured it out, and it wasn’t as “impossible” as we thought.

I think a lot more Catholics who love the Latin Mass should really sit down and think hard about a move to a place where there is a thriving Latin Mass parish. I think such a move could revolutionize their faith and make life pleasant and dynamic for them. I just ache when I see (here on CAF) how miserable so many Catholics are who long for an EF Mass. I wish they could find happiness.
 
latingirl;10445533:
well guys, I tried to attend a Latin Mass within my diocese, found a church about 2 hours away and tried to drive there. It was so far and in an unfamiliar place, I couldn’t even find it. (not everyone has GPS).
/QUOTE]

A side note: I’m a cradle Catholic, and have lived through V II, folk Masses (gick,) altar girls, and so forth. I’ve never seen an actual liturgical abuse committed by the celebrant, even though I’ve heard bad liturgical music badly performed, seen the felt banners (yuck,) and so forth. I’ve come to the realization that just because something at Mass is esthetically jarring, it isn’t liturgical abuse. I find that term batted about frequently, and sometimes wonder if people know what it actually means.

A second side note: The college I did my postgraduate work at had an elderly priest who celebrated the OF Mass in Latin. It reminded me a lot of the old Latin dialogue Mass, and I found that I really liked it from the sense of feeling more included by active participation. I believe this is the same format of the Mass that is broadcast daily on EWTN.
No, according to what some priests have told me, what I experienced was real liturgical abuse. Our priest was breaching the rubrics. And yes, if every OF Mass was like the ones on EWTN you would get absolutely no complaint out of me!
 
It seems to me, from reading CAF, that so many Catholics who love the EF Mass experience actual suffering and pain, and are in danger of developing bitterness and discouragement, when they are forced to attend an OF Mass and sit through what they consider in their heart to be a “second-rate” Mass. Even if they admit intellectually that the OF Mass is equal to the EF Mass (which is what the Church teaches), emotionally, they just can’t bring themselves to believe that.

I understand that. I feel the same way about alcohol use by Christians. I admit in my head, with my brain, that it’s OK for Christians to drink. But in my HEART, I can’t accept it. I think it’s awful. So I try to choose not to be around when Christians are drinking. Sometimes I can’t get out of it, but usually, I can easily avoid parish picnics, dinners, etc, where there is drinking of alcohol.

And there’s also the issue of associating with and enjoying fellowship with like-minded people. To me, that’s almost as valuable as being able to attend the Mass of your choice. It’s a great thing when you don’t have be constantly in conflict with others, but rather, can be friends and work/play/pray side-by-side

I know that not everyone can move (e.g., teenagers and the elderly). But I think that a lot more people could move if they would sit down, pray hard, and then work out the knotty logistics. When my husband and I lived in North Carolina and wanted to move back to Northern Illinois (to be near family), we never thought it would happen. But one day, we just sat down and figured it out, and it wasn’t as “impossible” as we thought.

I think a lot more Catholics who love the Latin Mass should really sit down and think hard about a move to a place where there is a thriving Latin Mass parish. I think such a move could revolutionize their faith and make life pleasant and dynamic for them. I just ache when I see (here on CAF) how miserable so many Catholics are who long for an EF Mass. I wish they could find happiness.
I do suffer some pain. I never really had a problem with attending the OF until I moved to Florida where it is so often celebrated sloppily. When our new priest started wearing vestments of a non-approved liturgical color, improvising prayers and introducing secular songs like Happy Birthday to the Mass, I was scandalized really badly. I am just now getting over it after switching parishes. I am starting once again to look forward to Mass instead of dreading it. Though I am quite satisfied with my new parish, my ears yearn for the sound of beautiful Latin chant , my lips yearn to give Our Lord that praise- and I can’t chant it myself because no one ever taught me. (Another part of the reason I left my old parish was because I was in the choir and ostracized for suggesting and expressing desire to learn and sing these traditional hymns.)

Liturgy is a dead serious thing to me and in my personal experience, not saying it is absolute truth here, the Latin Mass seems to introduce the aspect of liturgy and sacrifice more seriously. I feel different there, can’t explain it. Plus, bringing in the factor that I am an artist and the beauty of Catholicism is an important thing to me. But as I stated previously, appearances are one thing. To me, and according to the Catechism I was reading last night, liturgy is a teaching and the summit of Christian teaching (and Christian life) I hate seeing it treated carelessly and if I had the choice to move, believe me I would have been elsewhere in a second!😃 Thank you for your insights!
 
The closest Latin Mass for me is about 35 or so minutes away (highway) and at 3pm on Sundays. Not the most ideal time for me when I can go down the street and go to a OF Mass any time from 7am to 12:30pm.
 
I’m 5 minutes by car to Latin Mass on Sunday and Thursday nights (Eucharistic Adoration). :amen:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top