G
Ghosty
Guest
Mark T: Baptism is also a Sacrament, and can be performed by a layman as well. What you highlighted are the reasons why the Church requires that the Sacrament be performed the traditional way for it to be licit, but it does not explain the Sacrament. The actual description of the Sacrament is here:
Now, all this being said, if you were in such an illicit marriage and wanted recognition from the Church, you would still have to have the proper ceremony performed, reexchanging vows and everything in front of the priest and congregation. That’s because that’s the way the Church recognizes that the marriage happened, and has very good reasons for doing so. The Sacrament doesn’t “happen again”, however, it’s merely being publically recognized by the Church.
It’s actually been a matter of some debate throughout Church history, and you can read more about it here:
newadvent.org/cathen/09707a.htm
Again, my understanding could definately be faulty.
You’ll see that the the “indispensable element” of Marriage, the way the Sacrament is bestowed, is the consent between the spouses; no priest is mentioned. The Church normally requires the elements you listed, but this is explain as it being fitting and as protection for the spouses in question, not because of any Sacramental requirement. In other words, the Sacrament happens when two free adults consent to marriage (with all the implications of working towards having children that implies); the Priest is an assistant, and blesses the marriage, but he is still a “dispensable element”.1625 The parties to a marriage covenant are a baptized man and woman, free to contract marriage, who freely express their consent; “to be free” means:
1626 **The Church holds the exchange of consent between the spouses to be the indispensable element that "makes the marriage."127 **If consent is lacking there is no marriage.
- not being under constraint;
- not impeded by any natural or ecclesiastical law.
1627 The consent consists in a “human act by which the partners mutually give themselves to each other”: “I take you to be my wife” - "I take you to be my husband."128 This consent that binds the spouses to each other finds its fulfillment in the two "becoming one flesh."129
1628 The consent must be an act of the will of each of the contracting parties, free of coercion or grave external fear.130 No human power can substitute for this consent.131 If this freedom is lacking the marriage is invalid.
Now, all this being said, if you were in such an illicit marriage and wanted recognition from the Church, you would still have to have the proper ceremony performed, reexchanging vows and everything in front of the priest and congregation. That’s because that’s the way the Church recognizes that the marriage happened, and has very good reasons for doing so. The Sacrament doesn’t “happen again”, however, it’s merely being publically recognized by the Church.
It’s actually been a matter of some debate throughout Church history, and you can read more about it here:
newadvent.org/cathen/09707a.htm
Again, my understanding could definately be faulty.