A
Almost_convert
Guest
I was just thinking about the catechism’s statements on baptism and how it is necessary for salvation. So necessary in fact that infants are given this sacrament to allow for their adoption into God’s family as early as possible. However many evangelical Protestants don’t see baptism as necessary for salvation but simply a sign of one’s conversion. My question is: if it is so necessary why would it be debatable? I firmly believe that scripture is pretty clear on its necessity, which is just one of many reasons I’m converting. But many of my committed Christian friends don’t believe this. This includes pastors and PhDs - not just your run of the mill pastor-said-it-so-I-believe-it Christians. If it is such a serious issue that involves the fate of a person’s mortal soul, why don’t the scriptures just come right out and say - if you don’t get baptized you are going to hell so baptize infants as soon as you can, and don’t ever let anyone tell you it’s not necessary! Even as I’m writing this I am thinking of John 3 when Jesus basically says that, but other verses like Romans 10:9 just says “confess and believe” without mentioning baptism or good works for that matter. Also just to add to that it also says there in Romans 10 that anyone who calls on the name of The Lord will be saved, but Jesus says many will say “lord lord” and he will say depart I never knew you. You see sometimes it seems for every clear verse there is one to take away the clarity. If this is all so crucial why not be more clear?