F
faithful437
Guest
Saw this referenced on another thread. And for that matter, why is it in the Catholic Canon? Seems to have some adulterous themes in it. 
Esther herself prefigures Mary as she risks death to enter the kingâs throne room unannounce and without being summoned. To do so was punishable by death, even for the wife of the king, but she does so and intercedes on behalf of her people.Esther is a wonderful book!
One could say 2nd Samuel (with Bathsheba-Gate) has adulterous themes. Genesis (Lot and his girls, just to name one of many) would also be included.Saw this referenced on another thread. And for that matter, why is it in the Catholic Canon? Seems to have some adulterous themes in it.![]()
two correctiions: to set a precedent for establishing a non-Torah feast in the Jewish calendar, and âŚnot drinking enough wine.I have a Jewish commentary on Esther from the Jewish Publicatioin Society â so this is a mainline commentary.
That author and the author of the Jewish Study Bible âspinâ the Book of Esther as a rollicking comedy. In the Jewish Masoretic version, God is not mentioned, presumably not to be sullied with all the bawdy stuff that goes on there.
The experts looking at Esther from a historical criticism point of view give up quickly, because the type of things said there are not verifiable. For example, in Esther, it says that the king could not retract a decree, but no such prohibition existed in the Middle East when that book was written.
The humorous elements consist of all these sudden twists when the plot quickly shifts from disaster to victory. Hamon (is that his name, I havenât read this for a year), wants to exterminate the Jews, but he ends up on the gallows, eetc.
they figure the book was put into the Jewish canon for two reasons. 1) to explain the origin of the feast of Purim. 2) to set a precedent for establishing a non-Biblical feast in the Jewish calendar.
The saying goes, among the Jews, that if youâre not having a good time on Purim, youâre not drinking enough.
Since when did the Bible have to be coy?Saw this referenced on another thread. And for that matter, why is it in the Catholic Canon? Seems to have some adulterous themes in it.![]()
Indeed: Song of Solomon, anyone??Since when did the Bible have to be coy?
Genesis! With all that talk about âthose without foreskinsâ Song of Songs seems so last yesterdayIndeed: Song of Solomon, anyone??