Why is the world catering to just 14%?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Righteousone
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
The concern about paying tribute was that it may be seen as an act of worship. Like Hiram worshiped King Solomon with all the gold in Ophir.

1 Kings 10:14 Now the weight of gold that came to Solomon in one year was six hundred threescore and six talents of gold,
I am afraid you have completely misunderstood that verse in the Bible. First of all, paying tribute is not, and was not then regarded as an act of worship. Whenever a powerful nation conquered another nation, they would often bring it into tribute, meaning that they were obliged to pay money in the form of gold and silver, or real goods such as food or cloth etc, to their masters at a given rate year by year. It was a form of “conquerors tax”. During the reign of David and Solomon, the kingdoms of Israel and Judah became very powerful, in fact the most powerful in the region, and they succeed in bringing many of the surrounding nations in subjection to themselves, and thus bring them under tribute. Here is a typical example reference from the OT:

2 Samuel 8:

2 And he smote Moab, and measured them with a line, casting them down to the ground; even with two lines measured he to put to death, and with one full line to keep alive. And so the Moabites became David’s servants, and brought gifts.

6 Then David put garrisons in Syria of Damascus: and the Syrians became servants to David, and brought gifts. And the Lord preserved David whithersoever he went.

1 Chronicles 18:

2 And he smote Moab; and the Moabites became David’s servants, and brought gifts.

6 Then David put garrisons in Syria-damascus; and the Syrians became David’s servants, and brought gifts. Thus the Lord preserved David whithersoever he went.

“Brought gifts” means that they became tributaries to King David. Thus paying tribute was not regarded as an act of worship. It was something that a conquered nation was obliged to pay to its conqueror. In fact, this is something that God had commanded the Israelites to do:

Deuteronomy 20:

10 When thou comest nigh unto a city to fight against it, then proclaim peace unto it.

11 And it shall be, if it make thee answer of peace, and open unto thee, then it shall be, that all the people that is found therein shall be tributaries unto thee, and they shall serve thee.

12 And if it will make no peace with thee, but will make war against thee, then thou shalt besiege it:

Secondly, the “gold” that is mentioned in 1 Kings 10:14 did not just come from Hiram. They came from many sources, including many nations that were tributary to Israel, as well as those who voluntarily bought gifs, such as the Queen of Sheba did, and also including Solomon’s own trade. In fact, Solomon became very prosperous, and his kingdom became extremely rich:

2 Chronicles 9:

13 Now the weight of gold that came to Solomon in one year was six hundred and threescore and six talents of gold;

14 Beside that which chapmen and merchants brought. And all the kings of Arabia and governors of the country brought gold and silver to Solomon.

20 And all the drinking vessels of king Solomon were of gold, and all the vessels of the house of the forest of Lebanon were of pure gold: none were of silver; it was not any thing accounted of in the days of Solomon.

21 For the king’s [Solomon’s merchant] ships went to Tarshish with the servants of Huram: every three years once came the ships of Tarshish bringing gold, and silver, ivory, and apes, and peacocks.

22 And king Solomon passed all the kings of the earth in riches and wisdom.

23 And all the kings of the earth sought the presence of Solomon, to hear his wisdom, that God had put in his heart.

24 And they brought every man his present, vessels of silver, and vessels of gold, and raiment, harness, and spices, horses, and mules, a rate year by year.

26 And he reigned over all the kings from the river even unto the land of the Philistines, and to the border of Egypt.

27 And the king made silver in Jerusalem as stones, and cedar trees made he as the sycomore trees that are in the low plains in abundance.

zerinus

Continued . . . /
 
/. . . Continued

Thirdly, Hiram was never a “tributary” to Solomon or to Israel. Hiram was a great friend to Solomon (and previously to his father David), and for this reason Solomon decided to seek his help in building the great Temple at Jerusalem, which Hiram happily provided. Solomon in fact hired Hiram’s artisans and craftsmen for building the Temple, and paid them for their services (See 1 Kings chapters 5 to 10). Thus your idea that Hiram “worshipped” Solomon by paying him tribute is totally wrong. He did not pay him any “tributes” at all; and even if he had, it would not have been regarded as an act of “worship”.

The bottom line is that paying tribute to Caesar was not regarded as an act of worship, and that is not why Jesus was asked that question. It was a trick question to which He gave the appropriate reply.

zerinus
 
I don’t think the Egyptian Eye of Ra is supposed to be the Christian God, is it?
that is not the eye of RA on the great seat of the us on the money.

kids.niehs.nih.gov/triviadollar.htm
(from the above link)
although Franklin’s committee did not suggest a pyramid, it did originate the suggestion of the eye. However, the term “the all-seeing eye” was never officially used when describing it. The Franklin committee wanted the seal to include a reflection of divine providence and discussed a variety of themes including the Children of Israel in the Wilderness. This All seeing Eye also appears above the Altar at the Catholic Church I attend. Its not the eye of Ra.

Peace in the Lord

Scott
 
It is the tomb of Pharaoh.
No its not. In fact Pyramids have been used by most ancient peoples for various reason and uses. the one on the seal has many different symbols with in it as it is unfinished, there are 13 row leading to the top and others. It may resemble the great pyramid in Egypt but not a tomb of pharaoh.

Peace in the Lord

Scott
 
Since Ceaser delcared himself a “god” and since his image was on his coin, I would think that it would be quite likely that, FoA stated, the concern was that paying money to ceaser might be a form of worship.
 
Since Ceaser delcared himself a “god” and since his image was on his coin, I would think that it would be quite likely that, FoA stated, the concern was that paying money to ceaser might be a form of worship.
:doh2: Julius Caesar was posthumously procalimed to be a god by his successor Augustus. Coins would have more likely have bore the face of the contemporary emperor, Tiberius. An emperor could not have asserted his own divinity in his own lifetime in this time period because the senate still had some of the power. The emperor had to make it look like a republic, or he might find a knife in his back, as Nero would. Nero was insane in other ways, but he also forced people to bow down to him as if he were a god.

Finally, there is some passage somewhere that says that the Jews must not let a foreign power rule over them. Paying taxes was a form of subservience (intolerable for the Jews), and refusal to pay was rebellion. That is why the Pharisees asked Jesus if it was legal to pay taxes- if he said that taxes should be paid to Rome, he was an accomplice with the occupiers, and if he told people not to pay, he was a rebel.
 
:doh2: Julius Caesar was posthumously procalimed to be a god by his successor Augustus. Coins would have more likely have bore the face of the contemporary emperor, Tiberius. An emperor could not have asserted his own divinity in his own lifetime in this time period because the senate still had some of the power. The emperor had to make it look like a republic, or he might find a knife in his back, as Nero would. Nero was insane in other ways, but he also forced people to bow down to him as if he were a god.

Finally, there is some passage somewhere that says that the Jews must not let a foreign power rule over them. Paying taxes was a form of subservience (intolerable for the Jews), and refusal to pay was rebellion. That is why the Pharisees asked Jesus if it was legal to pay taxes- if he said that taxes should be paid to Rome, he was an accomplice with the occupiers, and if he told people not to pay, he was a rebel.
It was a form of subservience because God was supposed to be their king from the start. Jesus was drawing the line between worship and simply paying taxes when he said give to God what is God’s, that was the real question there.
 
It was a form of subservience because God was supposed to be their king from the start. Jesus was drawing the line between worship and simply paying taxes when he said give to God what is God’s, that was the real question there.
Jesus’ answer was completely unexpected. No one saw paying taxes as worshipping Caesar:rolleyes: But Jesus reminded people to “pay taxes” to God as well. (in quotes for a reason, don’t misinterpret it!)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top