R
Robert_Sock
Guest
What’s preventing the feeding of all people? We live in such a technologically advanced world, yet we cannot care for our own.
Is it capitalism?
Is it capitalism?
ThisThere is most certainly enough food. Corrupt governments and regimes often prevent the equitable distribution of food and other necessities.
Hardly!Robert Sock
Is it capitalism?
It sounds like a problem with greed. LOVE needs to become the dominant value in society. Capitalism spreads greed.Hardly!
The sneer of “capitalism” came from the Karl Marx of Communism, and Bl John Paul II in Centesimus Annus clearly dislikes the term, preferentially substituting instead, and seeing the great worth of, the “modern business economy” and the functioning of the “free market”, as well as the “market economy or simply free economy.” (#42).
Not only has free enterprise raised the welfare of untold millions out of poverty, but is emphatically affirmed by Bl John Paul II.
There is a solid basis of economic Catholic thought from the fourteenth century. In the fifteenth century the Late Scholastics who were Thomists (followers of St Thomas) “writing and teaching at the University of Salamanca in Spain, sought to explain the full range of human action and social; organization.” They “observed the existence of economic law, inexorable forces of cause and effect that operate very much as other natural laws. Over the course of several generations, they discovered and explained the laws of supply and demand, the cause of inflation, the operation of foreign exchange rates, and the subjective nature of economic value…” For these reasons Joseph Schumpeter applauded them as the first real economists. (Thomas E Woods Jr, The Church And The Market, Lexington Books, 2005, p 8).
In today’s world it is vital to explain what free enterprise is about. No wonder Pope Benedict XVI felt it necessary to teach that “Society does not have to protect itself from the market, as if the development of the latter were ipso facto to entail the death of authentically human relations…Therefore it is not the instrument that must be called to account, but individuals, their moral conscience and their personal and social responsibility.” (Caritas et Veritate, Benedict XVI, 2009, #36).
Totally unwarranted – and still obsessed with the sneer.Robert Sock #6
Capitalism spreads greed
I’ll take corporatism, with the addition of LOVE, as an inevitable outcome of capitalism. Corporatism with LOVE can most efficiently solve societies’ problems.Totally unwarranted – and still obsessed with the sneer.
Some PEOPLE are greedy, unjust, intemperate, swindle, cheat.
Like so much teaching, Catholic social teaching has developed and the recognition of the worth of the free economy is confirmed by Pope John Paul II in Centesimus Annus, built on the fundamental human right to economic initiative in Sollicitudo Rei Socialis.
What is missed here is that the free enterprise system was painstakingly developed by the Catholic Late Scholastics – it is absolutely fundamental to human nature, as is the right to economic initiative that enabled the escape from dire poverty of untold millions. The light of truth cannot be hidden under a bushel. They employed logic and reasoning for the development of mankind. Chafuen incisively points out: “The Doctors offered utilitarian arguments to show that goods that are privately owned are better used than commonly owned goods. This explanation offers a budding theory of economic development: the division of goods and their ultimate possession by private individuals facilitates increased production.” Christians For Freedom, Alejandro A Chafuen, Ignatius, 1986].
Free enterprise is not “greed driven” it is common good driven for the welfare of the greatest number and dependant on consumer satisfaction and competition, dependant on the laws of cause and effect involving God-given reason, and based on a standard social principle of Christ’s Church – subsidiarity.
Not quite true. I have seen food companies give enormous amounts of food to the poor, usually through either governmental agencies or charitable groups. That’s not entirely unselfish, of course, because they get to deduct the value of it.Companies which produces large amounts of food never consider giving surplus to the poor.
Thank you for the reply. I should always remember to never say never.This isn’t a really great example, but it’s the kind of thing a lot of food companies do. Also, they provide a lot under other programs. But this is the only one I could find readily.
meatpoultry.com/News/News%20Home/Business/2012/4/Tyson%20unveils%20mobile%20feeding%20unit.aspx