Why is there such a disconnect between Catholics and Bible -reading?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 123Strontium
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
WOW - If it weren’t for you being so new here I would be tempted to be insulted by such a sweeping indictment of my fellow Catholics. I suspect that the longer you are here and interact with members of this board you will discover that your sweeping indictment will need to be amended to:
Some Catholics seem to not have time to know God…”
Why would you seek to be insulted for what other people do?

I’ve been around for a while and for every one Catholic that truly has a relationship with the Father through the Son in the Holy Spirit. There are 5000 (don’t hold me to that number) Catholics that think is good and right to bow to statues (For example). It’s a worry some thing. This doesn’t mean that other than Catholics don’t have their issues, but we are talking about Catholics here. The church the world looks to for the Christian view on issues the world is dealing with. It’s not a indictment, its just the way it is.
I agree much more with this statement…but then trusting the Church is very much in line with Scripture whereas the opposite view is much less so.
Show me in scripture where it says one should trust the church more then what scripture, or the Lord God says.
Agree very much with this…But would also add that there is danger in becoming too isolated. Nowhere in Scripture do we find a “me and Jesus” theology. Rather we see Jesus founding a community that we are to be a part of, tell things to and listen to(Mt 18:15-18 - A community through which, “the manifold wisdom of God might now be made known to the principalities and powers in the heavenly places”. (Eph 3:8-12) And a community in which we can have confidence as being the pillar and ground of Truth (1 Tim3:15)
This is not to downplay our personal responsibility for growing in Christ. The personal journey goes on even within the larger ekklesial community. Both are necessary.
Peace
James
Though needless to say prophecy isn’t private, and edification is for one another, but on the other hand Abraham or Jacob, or Jeremiah or Elijah or Jonah or Job or even Moses for that matter would beg to differ on you comment of “me and Jesus”. Many of the prophets where on their own, other than the Word of the Lord being with them. I would say that qualifies as “me and Jesus” walk wouldn’t you? Though they did it amongst the Israelites, doesn’t mean they weren’t alone in their walk with the Lord.
 
Your suspicions are valid I was rased a Catholic and I know where of you speak. Catholics don’t have time to know God, that’s what they have priests for.
We don’t have time to know God? Why? I have time to read Scripture and pray Morning and Evening Prayer every day. Why wouldn’t other Catholics have time to do the same? I’m just an average person with as much time as anyone else. It is hoped our priests know God, but whether or not they do, as individuals, they certainly don’t know God for us and we let them do all the spiritual work. . No doubt there are those who do, but that’s not because the priests don’t encourage them to have their own life in Christ. I have to ask how many Protestants let their pastors “know God” while they just ride on his/her knowledge? Quite a few, I’m sure.
Hence they trust what the church says more then what the Bible says, and the protestant view is quite the opposite.
Protestants often say the opposite of what the Bible says. I heard plenty of bad theology when I was a Protestant–made up out of thin air. The Bible is the Catholic Church’s book. The NT was written by Apostles and their disciples, not by Protestant pastors. The Bible was compiled for use in the Church’s liturgies, so everyone would be using the same books in prayer and in study. You don’t know history.
You are responsible for knowing what the Lord God says in the Bible and you are to read it for your self so no one can deceive you so easily. Adam and Eve trusted what some one else said about what the Lord God said about eating the fruit of the tree, and you know how that turned out. That is how dangerous it is to intrust one’s own relationship with the Lord unto another.
Each of us will have to give an account of our lives before God. This doesn’t mean that everyone needs to have read the Bible in order to be saved. Infants who die never read the Bible, the mentally impaired cannot read it or perhaps understand it. Jesus never commanded us to read any book. Rather he commanded the Apostles to go and baptize, as well as take the Gospel message to the whole world. Baptism is the initiation into Christian life, not reading the Bible. That is a good thing to do, certainly, but it’s not what we depend upon for our salvation.
 
Your suspicions are valid I was rased a Catholic and I know where of you speak. Catholics don’t have time to know God, that’s what they have priests for. Hence they trust what the church says more then what the Bible says, and the protestant view is quite the opposite.

You are responsible for knowing what the Lord God says in the Bible and you are to read it for your self so no one can deceive you so easily. Adam and Eve trusted what some one else said about what the Lord God said about eating the fruit of the tree, and you know how that turned out. That is how dangerous it is to intrust one’s own relationship with the Lord unto another.
You don’t know what you are talking about. You know nothing about who knows God and who doesn’t. I have been to hell and back. You know nothing about my spiritual life, nor about how anyone else, Catholic or otherwise, has experienced God.

-Tim-
 
Why would you seek to be insulted for what other people do?
I don’t seek to - but sometimes it happens…😃
I’ve been around for a while and for every one Catholic that truly has a relationship with the Father through the Son in the Holy Spirit. There are 5000 (don’t hold me to that number) Catholics that think is good and right to bow to statues (For example). It’s a worry some thing. This doesn’t mean that other than Catholics don’t have their issues, but we are talking about Catholics here. The church the world looks to for the Christian view on issues the world is dealing with. It’s not a indictment, its just the way it is.
Don’t worry - I won’t hold you to that number. There is a certain truth in it - just as you say others have issues as well. However - it is good to keep perspective in communication and use qualifiers…“My experience” or “Many Catholics” and so forth rather than simply making blanket statements that cannot be backed up.
For the same reason I have learned to carefully express myself as “The Church teaches” rather than “Catholics believe”…One is generally singular and well documented while the other can vary widely over the 1 billion Catholics in the world.

Just some things I have learned in my time here…👍
Show me in scripture where it says one should trust the church more then what scripture, or the Lord God says.
First of all there does not need to be a distinction drawn between what Scripture says and what the Church says. One does not choose to trust one over the other, but rather each in concert with the other.
However - As to Scripture demonstrating the importance and authority of the Church -
Read Mt 18:15-18 and recognize that “sin” (as used in Mt 18:15) includes teaching a false gospel (doctrine). This passage clearly states to "Tell it to the Church and to Listen to the Church. This is the instruction.
Then go to Acts 15 to read this instruction put into practice on a doctrinal matter between distant church locations.

Scripture further states that we can have confidence in the above, since it is The Church which is the Pillar and ground of Truth (1 Tim 3:15) for it has been ordained:
*"that through the church the manifold wisdom of God might now be made known to the principalities and powers in the heavenly places. This was according to the eternal purpose which he has realized in Christ Jesus our Lord, in whom we have boldness and confidence of access through our faith in him *(Eph 3:10-12)
Though needless to say prophecy isn’t private, and edification is for one another, but on the other hand Abraham or Jacob, or Jeremiah or Elijah or Jonah or Job or even Moses for that matter would beg to differ on you comment of “me and Jesus”. Many of the prophets where on their own, other than the Word of the Lord being with them. I would say that qualifies as “me and Jesus” walk wouldn’t you? Though they did it amongst the Israelites, doesn’t mean they weren’t alone in their walk with the Lord.
you are right in calling me on this…I should have been more specific. I was thinking NT Scripture - not Scripture as a whole…(See, I’m still learning to communicate clearly too…;))

Certainly there are private aspects to the faith and the journey and the Lord has raised up great leaders in both the Old covenant and the New…Yet it can be seen by the passages I provided above, along with the many exhortations to unity found in the NT, that we are meant to work in a community, “testing the spirits” one with the other so that we may be of one mind. Unity is what Jesus prayed for us in John 17:20-21.

Peace
James
 
You don’t know what you are talking about. You know nothing about who knows God and who doesn’t. I have been to hell and back. You know nothing about my spiritual life, nor about how anyone else, Catholic or otherwise, has experienced God.

-Tim-
I’m sorry I though the subject was about why the Catholic church doesn’t seem to focus on scripture like some others do.

**I didn’t know it revolved around you personally, maybe you should have notified every one that this was all about you. **
 
I don’t seek to - but sometimes it happens…😃

Peace
James
LOL

Yea I can relate to that, it don’t take much does it? I blame it on “Grumpy Old Man Syndrom” but no ones buying it. thanks for the replies.
 
I’m sorry I though the subject was about why the Catholic church doesn’t seem to focus on scripture like some others do.

**I didn’t know it revolved around you personally, maybe you should have notified every one that this was all about you. **
You said that Catholics don’t have time to know God. You said that Catholics don’t trust God.

I’m tell you flat out, and would tell you to your face in public, that you know nothing about anyone elses spiritual life. You know NOTHING about who knows God and who hasn’t, who has experienced God and who hasn’t and who trusts God and who doesn’t. N-O-T-H-I-N-G. Nothing.

I know a Catholic woman who’s father and brother got tied up and shot in the back of the head execution style, and she stood up on court and forgave the murderer. I know men who have given up their entire lives - everything, including their possessions - to walk into a hell-hole country and serve Jesus by serving the poor. I know men who get up every day at 4:00 AM to pray, and who pray seven hours every day. I know Catholics who would follow Christ in to Hell itself.

You know nothing.

-Tim-
 
I’m not sure that there really is a disconnect. I’m a cradle Catholic. My family had bibles in the home and listened to Old and New Testament readings as well as portions of the Psalms at every Mass. We can read along with the priest in our missals or missalettes.
Our prayers (the Our Father and Hail Mary draw from the bible (the annunciation and the prayer Jesus taught). Much of the language of the Mass is drawn from the Bible.
By the time I graduated high school, I had read the bible through at home several times myself, in addition to reading along with and listening to the Mass readings and prayers and portions of the Bible which were used in religious instruction outside of Mass.
It is unfortunate that Catholics are sometimes stereotyped as not being Bible readers. Hopefully this misunderstanding will diminish in time.
 
I’m sorry I though the subject was about why the Catholic church doesn’t seem to focus on scripture like some others do.

**I didn’t know it revolved around you personally, maybe you should have notified every one that this was all about you. **
You said that Catholics don’t have time to know God. You said that Catholics don’t trust God.

I’m tell you flat out, and would tell you to your face in public, that you know nothing about anyone elses spiritual life. You know NOTHING about who knows God and who hasn’t, who has experienced God and who hasn’t and who trusts God and who doesn’t. N-O-T-H-I-N-G. Nothing.

I know a Catholic woman who’s father and brother got tied up and shot in the back of the head execution style, and she stood up on court and forgave the murderer. I know men who have given up their entire lives - everything, including their possessions - to walk into a hell-hole country and serve Jesus by serving the poor. I know men who get up every day at 4:00 AM to pray, and who pray seven hours every day. I know Catholics who would follow Christ in to Hell itself.

You know nothing.

-Tim-
WOW folks…Cant take it down a notch?

D,
there was no reason to make this personal. This is not “all about Tim” and it is unfair of you to say so.

Tim,
It is also unfair to say that D, “knows nothing”.

What is occurring here is that you are each making blanket and unsupportable statements and as the exchange continues, charity is quickly being lost.

I suggest that this exchange be dropped so that no one is moved to sin and that the conversation can move forward in a more productive way.

Peace
James
 
I don’t know if it’s some conspiracy by Protestants to put catholics down on the internet about how Catholics don’t believe in the Bible and how they don’t consider Bible-reading to be important?

What is going on?

But I can’t help thinking it’s partially true:
Even when speaking to catholics I know, they will tell me about catechism type rules, but they don’t sound spiritual in how they explain it e.g. They don’t mention how it relates to scripture, they just expound it like a rule, and not like a personalized belief. They say something like ‘You’re not supposed to such and such’ and ‘You’re supposed to go to confession’ etc. Like I can’t imagine having a conversation with a catholic about the life of Jesus or his teachings, because I suspect they either don’t believe it or haven’t read about it for themselves.
I love the Bible! I will discuss anything from the Bible with you anytime! It is the divinely inspired, revealed word of God, so if you say you are a Catholic, you really should read the Book and study it.

But I know what you mean. It makes me very uncomfortable when I try to discuss teachings from the Bible with other Catholics, and they come back at me, not with Scripture, but with a rule from the catechism. This is like substituting the teachings of Christ for the traditions of men, which we are expressly warned not to do. I think a lot of the reasons for many Catholics not being comfortable with the Bible is because traditionally the church did not encourage people to read it or understand it without the direction of a priest or religious. Again, the Bible itself exhorts us to do the opposite.
I find the many discrepancies between what I read in Scripture and what the church teaches to be quite fascinating and a great source of the deepening of my own personal faith in and knowledge of Jesus Christ.
 
Isn’t the bible that one block of wood that people put their right hand on in the courtroom that makes them sinless, in that they are unable to lie?

if we could only turn them into hats, we’d all be perfect. 😉
 
“I find the many discrepancies between what I read in Scripture and what the church teaches to be quite fascinating…” Care to share?
 
No, this simply isn’t true. Monastics have always spent hours every day reading and meditating on the written word of God, often reading and rereading single books for months and years until it became part of their though patterns, part of who they were.

It still takes place today. The monks I know meditate on God’s word and pray it back to God two hours every day. It is an incredibly important part of their life.

You do have a point about literacy and the avaibility of Bibles, but Catholics have not universally emphasized the Mass over scripture reading. The sacraments, worship, prayer, study and meditation of God’s word - these are all part of a well rounded spiritual life.

I can’t always get to Mass but I can read the Bible anywhere.

-Tim-
Actually, the Church does place emphasis on the Liturgy and Sacraments over private Scripture reading. Otherwise two-thousand years of people would have gotten the short-end of the stick (literacy is still low in many parts of the world). The point that many miss is that Scripture is ALWAYS an essential part of Liturgy. In fact, the whole first Liturgy is the LITURGY OF THE WORD. The Church has been teaching the Bible to illiterate people for two-thousand years. Even when it was read in Latin, the priest was there to explain it, along with stain glass, statues, and paintings.

The Sacraments and Liturgy have always taken precedent over personal Scripture reading. They are, after all, the normative means of Christ giving His saving grace through the Church. But the Mass involves Scripture. They cannot be separated.

*Note that I said “personal Scripture reading.” Scripture reading in the Liturgy is absolutely as important as the Mass because, well… it IS the Mass. The first half, anyway.
 
No, it is not accurate, nor is it factual.

The Church does not desire its members to remain ignorant. Pope Benedict XVI didn’t write “Jesus of Nazereth” so that individual Christians could remain ignorant.

The Church encourages reading and study of scripture. That is fact.

-Tim-
Do you think that a subculture might have come about of not reading the scripture, of even being proud of such, that is not encouraged by priests at all? This is how it has always struck me.

That said, the individuals in question have not necessarily been blessed with good moral discretion, so it is not unimaginable that a priest might say to them “just adhere to the teachings of the church” rather than recommending daily readings - in much the same way a doctor does not suggest people ask Dr Internet for information on medical matters.
 
This is not meant sarcastically or disrespectfully, but most Catholics have been taught, by word or action, that the only thing they have to do to stay in good standing with the church is to attend Mass on Sunday to meet a legalistic requirement. Doesn’t really create a fulfilling relationship.
Who has taught this? No one. Never.
 
This is not meant sarcastically or disrespectfully, but most Catholics have been taught, by word or action, that the only thing they have to do to stay in good standing with the church is to attend Mass on Sunday to meet a legalistic requirement. Doesn’t really create a fulfilling relationship.
Who has taught this? No one. Never.
Michael…I’m afraid I must disagree with your comment here. Certainly such has never been an official teaching, yet official teaching is not the only way in which one receives their faith. More important is what one learns from their parents and from the lives of their fellow parishioners.
I can speak from personal experience how some would consider themselves to be just fine with the Lord because they attended mass etc…Yet would present quite an unchristian example through their lives.
The children of such people are being “taught” the type of error that ChurchSoldier describes above.
So - I don’t think we can make the statement that “No one. Never”, teaches this.

Now - do most Catholics teach this - or learn this? That may be flip side of the overstatement coin.

Many may “learn this” but most do not intend to “teach” it…

Peace
James
 
I don’t know if it’s some conspiracy by Protestants to put catholics down on the internet about how Catholics don’t believe in the Bible and how they don’t consider Bible-reading to be important?

What is going on?

But I can’t help thinking it’s partially true:
Even when speaking to catholics I know, they will tell me about catechism type rules, but they don’t sound spiritual in how they explain it e.g. They don’t mention how it relates to scripture, they just expound it like a rule, and not like a personalized belief. They say something like ‘You’re not supposed to such and such’ and ‘You’re supposed to go to confession’ etc. Like I can’t imagine having a conversation with a catholic about the life of Jesus or his teachings, because I suspect they either don’t believe it or haven’t read about it for themselves.
Many religions believe that the original text is important. Catholicism teaches that the original text can only be understood through interpretation of a hierarchy. This belief gave legs to Protestantism. I think that there is a desire to connect directly which Catholicism appears to reject. How could anyone admire the pomposity of Catholic hierarchy? That is the big question which colors the discussion. People who just want to connect with God tend to reject the institution and its interference with that understanding and connection, which is perceived to be mainly focused on earthly power and wealth.

It is not a Protestant conspiracy. Just take a quick peek at the splendor or St Peter’s, and even the vestments of the Cardinal’s as they perform their ceremonial procession. To the Protestant, this looks like pomposity. If you read the bible and pay attention to what was said about wealth and avarice, and then look at the gold plated ceilings and art treasures… there is something there which resonates personally and spiritually. What do you think Jesus would have made of the Vatican and the procession of Cardinals into the Sistine Chapel? I am sure that this is deeply moving in one way to Catholics for its historic resonance. It is also resonant for others in a very different way.

Precisely what Catholics celebrate is precisely what some other Christians reject as materialism and disconnection from the Word.

The issue of language and religion is problematic. The BBC did an excellent series on language and religion, where they investigate the problem of actually understanding original sources in religion, and where language plays a role. Anyone interested in this topic might enjoy that series.
 
Nicely written post. I think that you do point out some very real issues…but I’m not sure how these tie into the subject of Catholics reading the. 🤷

That said - I do think that your post demonstrates certain misconceptions people have about the Church it’s structure and it’s teachings.
Many religions believe that the original text is important. Catholicism teaches that the original text can only be understood through interpretation of a hierarchy.
This is the first error in thinking. Interpretation does not come through the “interpretation of the Hierarchy”. Interpretation comes through the Holy Spirit to the “Ekklesia”…The community (universal) acting together to seek the Truth on a given matter. The hierarchy, the Magisterium, is the structure by which the various views, ideas and debates are filtered so that the Truth is preserved and error weeded out. Then - the “hierarchy” acts as the repository and disseminator of that Truth.
Where problems creep in is where people try to “re-interpret” something that has already been revealed by the Holy Spirit to The Church. Then those who wish a different interpretation try to accuse “the hierarchy” of being the problem.
This belief gave legs to Protestantism.
I agree with this…but in order to properly understand these things one must do some considerable study and try to understand the conditions at the time of the Protestant Reformation…and also be willing to question critically whether the conditions prevalent then are still applicable today.
I think that there is a desire to connect directly which Catholicism appears to reject. How could anyone admire the pomposity of Catholic hierarchy? That is the big question which colors the discussion. People who just want to connect with God tend to reject the institution and its interference with that understanding and connection, which is perceived to be mainly focused on earthly power and wealth.
“Appears to” - - - “perceived to”…These are the key phrases here.
The Catholic hierarchy is not pompous (though some individuals may be). The institution does not interfere with connecting with God.
Such things, if they are seen as true by an individual are, as you say, perceptions. And largely wrong ones.
It is not a Protestant conspiracy.
Agreed. Protestants themselves are too dis-unified to be able to mount a “conspiracy”.
Just take a quick peek at the splendor or St Peter’s, and even the vestments of the Cardinal’s as they perform their ceremonial procession. To the Protestant, this looks like pomposity. If you read the bible and pay attention to what was said about wealth and avarice, and then look at the gold plated ceilings and art treasures… there is something there which resonates personally and spiritually.
And yet - How many “bible Christians” have no problem with a “Joel Olsten” and others owning big houses and private airplanes etc…
How many have fallen for the “health and wealth” gospel while simultaneously looking down on the Catholics for the supposed wealth of the Vatican.
Is one acceptable and the other not? If so why?

Again - it gets into this thing of “perception”
What do you think Jesus would have made of the Vatican and the procession of Cardinals into the Sistine Chapel? I am sure that this is deeply moving in one way to Catholics for its historic resonance. It is also resonant for others in a very different way.
Well - considering that Jesus said not one word against the Jewish temple in Jerusalem - with all of it’s adornments - nor did he say anything against the rites and rituals contained therein…I don’t think he would have anything negative to say about this.
Jesus DID predict what would happen to the temple…and He did speak to the hearts of the men who were performing the rites and rituals…but that is different.
Precisely what Catholics celebrate is precisely what some other Christians reject as materialism and disconnection from the Word.
So - does this say more about us…or them…
The issue of language and religion is problematic. The BBC did an excellent series on language and religion, where they investigate the problem of actually understanding original sources in religion, and where language plays a role. Anyone interested in this topic might enjoy that series.
Agree - language is problematic. All too often we can find ourselves talking past one another.

Do you have a link for the program you mention above? Is it available on-line?

Peace
James
 
Too much to reply to, so I will simply relate my experience on this matter.

I was born and raised a Presbyterian. I am a Catholic Convert.

I married a Cradle Catholic. We raised our children in both churches. We attended either service randomly and the kids went all the religious programs available to each. As young adults, they chose confirmation as Catholics. When they had left home, I had no problem attending Catholic services with my wife.

Let me then state here categorically that NOBODY reads the Bible like Catholics do.

I grew up listening to preachers read the bible in church. I went to bible studies and in Sunday School I had to memorize 100 bible verses to win the “Coveted white Bible” (What an oxymoron that is!) I attended the Presbyterian youth group and we read the bible. I went on retreats and we read the bible. I was confident that I had a good biblical understanding of Christianity because for all my life I had been reading the Bible.

But after I was married and started to attend Catholic Mass, I discovered something that I was amazed at. Catholics read the bible at mass EVERY DAY! Not only that, but they read different parts of it EVERY DAY. Not the same thing over and over again. Suddenly I heard stuff I had never heard in a protestant sermon. There were parts of the Bible that I had not only never heard of, but passages that contradicted some of what I had been taught my whole life! Somebody told me that if I went to mass every day I would hear the entire Bible read in three years!

This was interesting. All my life I was taught that this scripture or that passage was proof that we should act in a certain way or believe a certain thing. Suddenly as I read further down the page I found that there was a further explanation of the thought, or a caveat that changed the whole meaning of the passage. WOW! Who knew? Well, the Catholics knew.

Catholics don’t read or understand the bible? Are you kidding? They WROTE it. Who better to understand it? Faith without works? Preposterous. Sola Scriptura? By what authority? All you need to do is read the bible to understand? Surely you could get a lot out of it that way, but how could you truly understand unless you have read the ancient manuscripts and studied the languages and what them meant at the time they were written? A man by himself can never accomplish what thousands of scholars over thousands of years have done and understand.

Was the church keeping people ignorant on purpose for its own good? Of course not! Christ himself told us to go out into the world and preach the gospel. Paul tells us that all Holy Scripture is good for teaching the word of God. It is in the basic best interest of the Church to continually spread the word as Crist taught us!

Then why weren’t the people allowed to have bibles in the early days? The only available written bibles at the time were hand lettered, hand drawn copies, laboriously worked on for months or years at a time and only the churches could afford to have one. There were not family bibles handed down from father to son with genealogies and pictures of Grandma in them. People simply had no access to a bible until Johannes Gutenberg devised a way to print them in mass. And that didn’t happen until fourteen hundred years after Christ. It was far from a Papal conspiracy, it was simple economics.

I converted at Easter Vigil in 2010. Here’s what I have discovered about Catholics in general:

Many cradle Catholics don’t completely understand their faith. Perhaps they are born into a very devout family that attends mass every Sunday and goes to Religious education classes but aren’t really told the meaning of things Many parents answer questions with “Because that’s the way we do it.” It’s not that they’re bad parents, but merely parents, trying to keep a child from misbehaving.

Religious education is taught by lay teachers, volunteer parents and people who are trying to teach a serious, important lesson while herding cats.

My wife often speaks about the “Rules of the church.” I speak of them as the “beautiful gifts” of the church. What is the difference? As a child, when you are told to do something it is a rule. There are rarely explanations, only instructions.

By itself, confession sounds pretty awful. But like putting scripture into its proper context, when confession is put into the context of reconciliation and preparedness for accepting the VERY BODY AND BLOOD of our Lord Jesus Christ, it is a beautiful gift that makes us worthy of accepting His sacrifice. HOW AWESOME IS THAT? Sometimes it is only as willing accepting adults that we can see that.

As an adult, who has grown and matured and is ready for the truth, you will hear it and accept it. And these converted Catholics are the zealots that keep the faith alive and vibrant, who understand that Catholicism springs from the Holy Scriptures, nurtured by the Church traditions, taught by the church fathers and EXPLAINED by the Catechism.

I believe that all misunderstandings about the Catholic Church stem merely from ignorance. The lack of knowledge about what Catholics do and why.

I teach the youth in our church: Question everything. Find the answers. Look it up. There is not a question that you can ask about the Catholic Church that doesn’t have 2000 years of study, observation, analysis and tradition to back it up. There is nothing superfluous, noting added and nothing taken away from the scriptures and the teachings of our Lord Jesus Christ.

If you have a question about the faith, the Catholic Church has the answer based on scripture. Even the traditions of the church have their basis in scripture. Who would know these things better than the very people who wrote them?

NOBODY reads the Bible like the Catholics.

Michael Hager
Some Thoughts
 
This is the first error in thinking. Interpretation does not come through the “interpretation of the Hierarchy”. Interpretation comes through the Holy Spirit to the “Ekklesia”…The community (universal) acting together to seek the Truth on a given matter. The hierarchy, the Magisterium, is the structure by which the various views, ideas and debates are filtered so that the Truth is preserved and error weeded out. Then - the “hierarchy” acts as the repository and disseminator of that Truth.
Where problems creep in is where people try to “re-interpret” something that has already been revealed by the Holy Spirit to The Church. Then those who wish a different interpretation try to accuse “the hierarchy” of being the problem.
James,

The whole post was filled with good info, but for me, the quoted paragraph above really stands out. * “the “hierarchy” acts as the repository and disseminator of that Truth.”* – I love it! 👍
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top