Why Jesus over Lord Krishna?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ben_Sinner
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
God becoming fully humane in Jesus is the fulleness of gods revelation. This is what makes Christianity the completion of Gods revelation, none of the other world religions have this.
 
What gives Jesus the edge of authority over someone like Krishna if you were to compare the both of them. At face value, they look pretty evenly matched.

Jesus was God in the flesh and said “I am the way”
Krishna was God posing as a human who also said he was the beginning, middle, end, the way.

So they are both claiming to be God, not just a prophet or messenger.

Jesus performed many miracles
Krishna performed many miracles

Thy both performed many miracles.

I’m trying to find the edge that Jesus has over Krishna. What would that edge be?

Many will say the resurrection, but the other Gods fulfilled promises to “prove” they are God as well in different ways. What makes the resurrection so special compared to those?
What did Krishna did for the world that merit worship? He didn’t die for us. Christ did. Krishna did a lot of killing, Christ none. Christ was meek and humble and suffered for us. Krishna lived the life of royalty and had many wives and children.

Unfortunately comparisons done this way is not meaningful. We believe in one God. Which unfortunately for Krishna, mean we have no room for other gods. Whereas the other has many other gods to choose and supplement.

Therefore, for one who must discern the “greatness” of the 2 choices must study the message and moral thought of these 2 men and decide who is worthy of worship. The caste system already is a major stumbling block. For Christ, his Love for us and capacity for forgiveness is supreme.
 
You will need to do both material and spiritual research. You will find that every Manifestation of God had a ‘golden age’ and you can find the Hindu golden age in wiki and other places.

In very old religions like Hinduism a lot of the original teachings have been lost and a lot of practices have crept in that were nothing to do with the original teachings such as the caste system.

Originally, like all Manifestations of God Krishna taught one God and to do good and this had a great spiritual affect on Indians even today but as religion declines it needs to be renewed and thus Krishna has stated in the Baghavad-Gita …

“In order to deliver the pious and to annihilate the miscreants, as well as to reestablish the principles of religion, I advent Myself millennium after millennium.” (chap. 4)

Krishna also taught things like karma and that we are not our body but are eternal soul or spirit that only uses the body like a vehicle. Reincarnation was not an original teaching taught by Krishna but a superstition that crept in later as did idol worship.

A virtuous life, to be good, holy, saintly and pure. You can do more research.
 
What did Krishna did for the world that merit worship? He didn’t die for us. Christ did. Krishna did a lot of killing, Christ none. Christ was meek and humble and suffered for us. Krishna lived the life of royalty and had many wives and children.

Unfortunately comparisons done this way is not meaningful. We believe in one God. Which unfortunately for Krishna, mean we have no room for other gods. Whereas the other has many other gods to choose and supplement.

Therefore, for one who must discern the “greatness” of the 2 choices must study the message and moral thought of these 2 men and decide who is worthy of worship. The caste system already is a major stumbling block. For Christ, his Love for us and capacity for forgiveness is supreme.
I totally agree with you. There is no reason for you to even consider Krishna, Jesus should be more than enough to meet all your needs. So you should just forget that you ever heard about Krishna.

The problem is that once you get hung up on this dogma that there can only be One Son of God, what will you do when another Son of God (who is not Jesus) shows up?

Muslims are expecting the Imam Mahdi, a Messenger/Manifestation of God any day now. Jesus will return too, but maybe a few years later after the Mahdi appears.

Are you then going to reject the next Son of God - the Mahdi? Are you going to resist or fight his followers? What if some Church leaders accept this Mahdi? Are you going to fight them?
 
The problem is that once you get hung up on this dogma that there can only be One Son of God, what will you do when another Son of God (who is not Jesus) shows up?

Muslims are expecting the Imam Mahdi, a Messenger/Manifestation of God any day now. Jesus will return too, but maybe a few years later after the Mahdi appears.

Are you then going to reject the next Son of God - the Mahdi? Are you going to resist or fight his followers? What if some Church leaders accept this Mahdi? Are you going to fight them?
Aha! Christ already foresaw that and warn us of false prophets. If another were to bring another gospel that is contrary to his, that will be the anti-Christ I suppose. There is only one Son of God. Those who claim to be gods or additional sons of Gods and with enough tricks up their sleeves to pass off as gods, I guess will have to fight that out among themselves. That is not our realm. Our responsibility is to worship God and no other gods. Thousands of years ago, the Israelites were presented with the God of Abraham or Baal. Some chose Baal to their demise.

Many will follow the anti-Christ. All that has been prophesied. Those who wants to follow the latest fad is their choice. Fortunately for us, we have a Church that has been guaranteed by Christ himself to hold off the devil. When Christ comes again, that will be the end of the world. There won’t be any advance warnings or sending of scouting agents ahead on behalf of Christ. There won’t be a John the Baptist equivalent. No one knows the day or time of his second coming. If other churches or church leaders were to abandon the Church or to ignore the Bible and to hang around the Mahdis of the world, that is their choice. But they can not be said not to have been forewarned.
 


The problem is that once you get hung up on this dogma that there can only be One Son of God, what will you do when another Son of God (who is not Jesus) shows up?



Are you then going to reject the next Son of God - the Mahdi? Are you going to resist or fight his followers? What if some Church leaders accept this Mahdi? Are you going to fight them?
Who is “hung up” is their own affair. Every one of us must look to themselves.

Would you use your individual initiative and discretion based on the merits of the situation to “fight” (in any sense) anybody, whether Mahdies, non-Mahdies, etc?
 
… There is no reason for you to even consider Krishna … So you should just forget that you ever heard about Krishna.

It’s plenty fine to know as much as we like about Krishna! Post 112 is good on the subject.
 
The Promised One has already come. Christ has already returned and His New Name is Baha’u’llah and the entire world is in the process of accepting Him.

But those with huge and massive vested interests like billions of followers will insist it’s anti Christ and false and the word of false prophets like they accused Christ before. No different.

Scoffers will deny and scoff. Do people honestly think leaders of religion are going to give up billions of their congregation to Christ when He returns? They’d crucify Christ again and will oppose Him as they see it is against their interests. No religious leaders will accept Christ’s return but will be the first ones to oppose Him.

Every eye shall see Him refers to spiritual as as it is said Let Him that has eyes let Him see.

2PE3.3 Knowing this first, that there shall come in the last days scoffers, walking after their own lusts,

2PE3.4 And saying, Where is the promise of his coming? for since the fathers fell asleep, all things continue as they were from the beginning of the creation.
 
As it has been said people are waiting for Krishna and Jesus to return, they are equal and not to be preferred above each other.

Baha’u’llah has explained this in detail in the Book of Certitude - reference.bahai.org/en/t/b/KI/ki-3.html

After putting forward many logical proofs, Baha’u’llah warns us like this;

“…Great God! Notwithstanding their acceptance of the truth of this tradition, these divines who are still doubtful of, and dispute about, the theological obscurities of their faith, yet claim to be the exponents of the subtleties of the law of God, and the expounders of the essential mysteries of His holy Word. They confidently assert that such traditions as indicate the advent of the expected Qá’im have not yet been fulfilled, whilst they themselves have failed to inhale the fragrance of the meaning of these traditions, and are still oblivious of the fact that all the signs foretold have come to pass, that the way of God’s holy Cause hath been revealed, and the concourse of the faithful, swift as lightning, are, even now, passing upon that way, whilst these foolish divines wait expecting to witness the signs foretold. Say, O ye foolish ones! Wait ye even as those before you are waiting!”

Regards Tony
Tony, I laid out the evidence as to why Christ is owed greater fealty. For one thing, he demanded it (unlike Krishna), Jesus is our creator and without him nothing was made that was made (Krishna is not your creator), Jesus is the sole cause of our salvation and us being able to be reconciled with God through his sacrifice on the cross (Krishna is not). That last point however is important because Hindu’s and Bahai have to deny it, despite that being what is in the New testament.

Let’s ask two important questions.

What do I lack in not worshipping or adoring Krishna? Nothing. In that my status before God is unaffected because Krishna is not necessary.

What do I lack in not worshipping and adoring Christ? Everything. If I deny or do not recognise Christ, his incarnation and sacrifice for sins, then salvation very probably eludes me. If I do not look at Christ, I am not looking towards God but towards something else.

In this discussion we have been taking for granted the authority of the New testament, Christian, Bahai and Hindu. The New testament speaks as to how Christ is greater than Moses, specifically in Hebrews. Moses gave to the Jews the Law and was closer to God than anyone before him, so much so that scriptures says he saw the back of God. Yet the New testament goes one step further and tells us Jesus is greater than Moses, Moses being a faithful servant, Jesus being the builder of God’s household.

How does the argument for Krishna in that context make any sense? Moses was not worthy of worship, he was in fact a man who erred (when he disobeyed God in Numbers 20). Moses was greater than Krishna and Jesus is more necessary than anyone before and after him by virtue of him being the redeemer and reconciler of God and Man.
 


Krishna claimed to be the Supreme Personality of Godhead. … Disunity and wars have sprung from supremist ideals not from the original teachings.

“For whenever Right declines and Wrong prevails, then O Bharata, I come to birth. 8 To save the righteous, to destroy the wicked, and to re-establish Right I am born from age to age.”

(Bhagavad-Gita)
It was claimed on his behalf. Which does not at all prevent us taking those words on their merits.

When Vishnu comes back, will he bring an even better Paraclete?

Religious truth is like my friend’s flat - he “couldn’t find his car logbook” - it’s “in there somewhere”! 😉
 
It was claimed on his behalf. Which does not at all prevent us taking those words on their merits.

When Vishnu comes back, will he bring an even better Paraclete?

Religious truth is like my friend’s flat - he “couldn’t find his car logbook” - it’s “in there somewhere”! 😉
Lol

Excellent analogy Vic!!

If we look with an intention to find commonality and unity between religions we will find it in abundance.
For me, at least, there is no doubt that all the worlds major global religions Coke from the one same God 🙂

.
 
Who is “hung up” is their own affair. Every one of us must look to themselves.

Would you use your individual initiative and discretion based on the merits of the situation to “fight” (in any sense) anybody, whether Mahdies, non-Mahdies, etc?
I personally would not fight anyone even if I did not believe in him. But there are many in the world today who are gearing up to fight ‘false’ Messengers, anti-Christs etc.

If a muslim Mahdi or ‘Son of God’ appears many Christians may think they need to ‘fight’ him and his followers. Even some Muslims may believe he is a false Messiah and think they need to ‘fight’. In some cases, this could lead to violence. Such violence has already been predicted.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top