Do Catholics ever advance in their faith anymore? Do they ever get to the point that they actually accept the Faith in their heart? Is the Christian message, as expressed by the Church, so unconvincing that participation in the EUCHARIST needs to be enforced under penalty of sin? If so, the case for the presence of Christ on our altars has not been made. And if the case for Christ has not been made, the whole “obligation” thing is really worthless.
There is no virtue and no grace in attending Mass out of obligation. What is needed is a better explanation as to WHY faithful Catholics should attend Mass. Christians should be drawn to the Eucharist, not forced at the point of a bayonet. Leave the entry-level theory of “obligation” for the first graders and prison camp inmates.
Any takers?
Of course Christians advance in their faith. But it is not a linear line. In some seasons of faith, we are excited to go to Mass and go at every opportunity, but in other seasons of Faith, it is not that easy, regardless of what we know intellectually.
Just because you “accept the Faith in their heart” (whatever that means) doesn’t mean that some things (like attending Mass) are still not difficult sometimes.
This past winter my youngest child was an absolute terror at Mass, and I (also being 4-5 months pregnant) did not always feel very well. I would spend the entire Eucharistic prayer out in the vestibule with a screaming child, hoping I could keep my breakfast. I wanted to go to Mass, but I didn’t want to go and have to take care of this child or get sick in a public place. But knowing that I had an obligation to attend Mass and would have to seriously discern whether my obligation was dispensed, motivated me to go to Mass. It was not the Mass that I did not want to attend, but it was the earthly things that made Mass difficult. (In my case it was a child, and my own body).
Your reasoning falls flat, their is virtue in attending out of obedience and obligation. (or obedience wouldn’t be a virtue). To go to Mass to worship God even when we don’t want to go, is a virtue. Just like when we don’t feel like loving (or being loving to our spouses) but we do it anyways, yes out of obligation and charity. This is a form of love, I choose to love even when I don’t “feel” loving, even when it is hard to love.
You mistakenly equate obligation with fear of hell or mortal sin, but it is not, sometimes it is just the body is weak, though we want to attend Mass and receive graces and worship God. But even if it was true, is not fear of hell or mortal sin a form of love as well? If we are honest about why we fear hell or mortal sin, it is because we fear separation from God. If we fear separation from God, then wouldn’t that mean we Love God?
We are sinful and weak, thus an obligation, just because at one point in our faith journey we don’t or shouldn’t need an obligation, does not mean that that at other times the obligation is useful to us. Besides God commanded us to keep Holy the Lord’s Day, sometimes people need to be told that they are going against God’s commandments, the easiest way to do that is with an obligation.