Why Muhammed Preached about God?

  • Thread starter Thread starter meedo
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I thought that Muhammed initially spoke about God by way of revelations that he said were being given to him. He felt a presence come upon him while he was praying in a cave. He himself wasn’t sure if it was a benevolent spirit or a demon, but he felt something came upon him and was compelling him to memorize its message, which he later preached. In the first encounter, he was so terrified that this spirit would possess him that he ran from the cave and had thoughts of jumping off a cliff to avoid possession. But his wife convinced him to return to the cave and receive more revelation. So, what was this spirit? A demon, the invention of a mentally ill mind, the Angel Gabriel? Whatever it was it was the impetus for him to initially “preach about God”.
 
Gabriel appeared to Daniel, in the book of Daniel. And Daniel was afraid. What did Gabriel say to him? “Daniel do not be afraid.” Gabriel appeared to Zechariah in the temple. He was troubled and was afraid. What did he say? “**Zechariah do not be afraid.” **Well, Gabriel appeared to Mary, the mother of Jesus. She was troubled. What did he say? “Mary, do not be afraid.” When he appeared to Mohammed, if he was Gabriel, we would have expected that the first thing he would say to Mohammed would be, “Mohammed, don’t be afraid.” But that didn’t happen. Mohammed went trembling, scared, fearful, terrified, to his wife, and he said, "A spirit came to me and squeezed me."And he needed someone else to tell him it is gabriel as if Khadija or Waraqa ever met him. Very UN-Gabriel like.
 
All in all, what did Muhammad profit from preaching about God? well money, unlimited women, power and respect. Would any man wish better? Did Jesus or even Paul whom Muslims hate benefit the same way? nop.
 
All in all, what did Muhammad profit from preaching about God? well money, unlimited women, power and respect. Would any man wish better? Did Jesus or even Paul whom Muslims hate benefit the same way? nop.
They both got killed for their beliefs, in fact. Kind of the opposite.
 
To begin, in his youth Mohammad was a member of a polytheistic Arabic religion in
which the adherents worshipped 360 pagan gods in the ‘Kabal’ in Mecca. He eventually felt that polythesism was wrong, probably
at the time when he had been tutored by Monophosyte monks - Christian heretics who rejected the belief in the divinity of Christ.
Also, at this time in his life, there was a large population of Jews and Christians on the Arabian peninsula who brought the
concept of monotheism with them. By the time Mohammad grew up, the peninsula was torn by civil strife among warring clans,
Mohammad being a member of the ‘Quraish’ tribe. Upset by the political situation in his land, the young prince attempted to unify
the peninsula by espousing a monotheistic religion: the concept of One Undivided God whom the nation could politically and so-
cially emulate. The new “universal” religion of Islam was to supersede the Old and New Testaments of the Holy Bible. Jews and
Christains were to be associated with as ‘the people of the book’ whose earlier prophets pointed towards the coming of the
prophet Mohammad. Having been influenced by Gnostic teachings, Mohammad naturally denied the divinity of Christ
and rejected the concept of the Holy Trinity. For any division in God smacked of disunity and disharmony in this world.
All this had occured by the late seventh century.

The legitimacy Islam had to prove could only be claimed by showing a historical connexion with the Old Testament.
Moses and the prophets and the seer King David say nothing about Mohammed. On the contrary, they prophesy
only of Christ as God’s Annointed One. An Old Testament figure, of some apparent significance, had to be pinned down
to assure Islam its rightful place in God’s revelation to mankind: that character was Ishmael.

Let us turn to the first
book of the Old Testament: Genesis. As the foundation of their faith, Muslims believe that Ishmael was their father
and that he received the Covenant of God through Abraham. In the Koran, Surah lll reads: “We believe in God, and
that which has been sent down to us, and sent down on Abraham and Ishmael, Isaac and Jacob, and the Tribes, and
in that which was given to Moses and Jesus, and the prophets, of their Lord; we make [no distinction] among any of them
and to Him we surrender.” This is where Mohammed had obviously distorted the Old Testament account of the legitimate
heir of Abraham and where Christian theologians were led to accuse the Muslim prophet with “bastardizing” the teachings of
the Bible.

In the Book of Genesis, we read that Ishmael was the son of Abraham and Hagar, Sarah’s handmaid or bondswoman.
He was conceived in adultery and sin, when Abraham slept with his maidservant, and so the child was to be an out-
cast forever. So God established His covenant through Isaac, Abraham’s legitimate son. And thus Ishmael was disinherited.
Once Ishmael was outcast, he is mentioned only in genealogies, and in his alliance with the disinherited son of Isaac, Esau.
God clearly says: " I will establish my covenant with Isaac. For an everlasting covenant, and with his seed after him"
[Genesis 17:19]. Biblical history clearly reveals the events concerning Ishmael and God’s Covenant, which Mohammed
deliberately twisted and distorted. “And we Allah made covenant with Abraham and Ishmael” [Surah ll]. “And mention
in the book Ishmael; he was true to his promise, and he was a Messenger and a Prophet. He bade his people to pray and
give alms, and he was pleasing to his Lord” [Surah XIX]. Mohammed goes further to claim that Abraham was no Jew,
but a Muslim, and “one of pure faith” [Surah lll]. History, rational thinking, and scholarly research show that Islam was founded
on a lie.
 
We have sent thee inspiration, as We sent it to Noah and the Messengers after him: We sent inspiration to Abraham, Isma’il, Isaac, Jacob and the Tribes, to Jesus, Job, Jonah, Aaron, and Solomon, and to David We gave the Psalms. Surah 4.163

wrong chronoligical order of patriarchs and the great prophets of the Bible from the eighth century BC onwards, are entirely absent in Quran and there is nothing of the teaching of the writing prophets of the OT and practically nothing of the teaching of the NT.Yet there are numerous stories in the Qur’an relating to the earlier prophets and NT figures which are borrowed from Jewish Talmudic sources and Christian apocryphal writings .It seems that Muhammad’s knowledge of the Bible was limited to information from secondary sources thou this knowledge did improve with time…one can give many repetitive historical passages in Quran where Muhammad added new details each time…i can digest it that Allah did not prohibit alcohol abrubtly but needed time to reveal it step by step…but why would it take Allah MANY verses to recount a historical event, each time adding a new detail?😉

Check this about Gabriel:

Bukhari 4.827
I got the news that Gabriel came to the Prophet while Um Salama was present. Gabriel started talking (to the Prophet and then left. The Prophet said to Um Salama, “(Do you know) who it was?” (or a similar question). She said, “It was Dihya (a handsome person amongst the companions of the Prophet ).” Later on Um Salama said, "By Allah! I thought HE WAS NONE BUT DIHYA, till I heard the Prophet talking about Gabriel in his sermon.” :whacky:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top