Every time I think I’ve heard every possible wacky objection/complaint about the Catholic Church, I come across another one like this.
Well, most Catholic churches don’t have central heating. As most of them have very high ceilings it would be very expensive and most of the heat would be wasted high up in the rafters. As most protestant churches are smaller and have lower ceilings, this shouldn’t be a problem. (And I guess the protestant “mega-churches” have so much money it’s not a problem either.)
I’ve never thought of it as “rude” or “unfriendly” to leave one’s coat on if it’s cold. When you go to a football game or some other outdoor activity in winter, you don’t take your coat off, and you still manage to be friendly.
Well they were just weird. Every Catholic parent I know makes sure that their sons take their hats off in church.
Unfortunately you’ll find there are a lot more people who hate and want to harm/rob Catholics than there are who hate protestants. I’ve never heard of a coat being stolen during Mass, but I have witnessed stolen/vandalised cars.
I’d be a bit shocked if I ever heard a priest telling the congregation to bring their valuables to Communion. I’ve noticed some old spinsters do go up to communion clutching their handbags.
My wife goes to the opposite extreme, I guess as kind of a statemnent that she trusts her fellow parishioners: She always leaves her bag sitting on the end of the pew, wide open with her purse, phone, car/house keys and PDA clearly visible.
Petergee, I would appreciate my query not being labelled as “wacky.”
First of all, I think that most Catholic Church buildings, like most buildings in general in the U.S., are heated. It may not be toasty warm, but it isn’t non-heated. That’s hard on pipes, drywall, etc. Besides, Catholic church sanctuaries are generally in use EVERYDAY (Mass, prayer, etc.), unlike many Protestant church sanctuaries which are in use twice on Sunday morning, and once on Wednesday night.
(Many of the new Protestant church buildings have a "multi-purpose room that doubles as a sanctuary, lecture hall, fellowship hall, and gymnasium.)
Secondly, the majority of Protestants churches, even the contemporary ones, in our city, have very high ceilings. And many of the contemporary ones have high ceilings, too, so that they can double as a gymasium during church socials. I’ve seen very few Protestant churches with low ceilings.
Are you serious? If someone came to YOUR HOME for dinner, and left their coat on throughout the evening, you wouldn’t think that is strange? And comparing a church service to a football game…they’re not the same thing! A football game is an outdoor recreational activity–of course people are jolly! But a Mass is an indoor spiritual worship discipline–people aren’t going to be doing a victory dance every time the priest says Amen.
I’m extremely disappointed in my Catholic brothers and sisters, that they are using arguments along the lines of “We don’t want to be like the Protestants and have a warm, comfortable building for people to receive Jesus in.” I thought only Protestant thought that way. I’m really taken aback by the lack of hospitality in Catholic churches–to me, turning up heat so that people are comfortable is just basic good manners. It’s not “Protestant,” and if it is, well, they got that one right.
Some of you say it is too expensive to turn up heat in a church building and that the money should be used for others. Do you also leave the heat off in YOUR homes, and then give the money that you would have paid the gas or electric company to the Church? Why don’t you stop eating any food other than what is necessary to sustain life, and give all THAT money to the Church? Or give away all your possessions except what is necessary for life, and give all THAT money to the Church? Sorry, I don’t buy that argument. It is not extravagent spending to help people stay warm and comfortable at Mass.
As for those of you who say that warmth isn’t necessary for friendliness–well, OK. But why can’t you have both?
And someone mentioned turning a cloak room into an Adoration Chapel. Wonderful, but again, why can’t you have both? Our church built an Adoration Chapel in a different building away from the sanctuary. I’ve seen other churches where the Adoration Chapel is in a separate building than the main building. Why do you have to eliminate a useful part of the building? Just do both. Or leave a part of the cloak room when the Adoration Chapel is built.