E
Elizabeth502
Guest
And you would know this how?.People already do fake confessions in person…
And you would know this how?.People already do fake confessions in person…
How about marriage by proxy or letter?The issue plain and simple is that sacraments must take place in person to be valid.
I think you misunderstood. The poster was stating that a person who is considered to be an invalid (one who is house-bound or hospital-bound) can have someone bring the Eucharist to him. He was not saying that the Eucharist was not valid. Communion can be brought to an invalid by either a Eucharistic Minister or an EMHC, and the communion would be both valid and licit.ok I am going to assume you meant an Extra ordinary minister of holy communion and not a Eucharistic minister, as a eucharistic minister would be a deacon, priest, or bishop. Give that If the EMHC was not validialy commissioned for this ministry the yes it would be illict but not invalid. the only way to recv an invalid communion would be if the Priest or bishop did not consecrate the bread and wine.
How about marriage by proxy or letter?VC
I’m not sure of all the details, but my (fallible) recollection is that it was possible to effect a sacramental marriage without the personal presence of both parties, i.e. one party and a proxy (or letter) which expresses the absent party’s consent.Is it truly a sacrament if the two never meet? I may need to brush up on my sacramental theology of marriage.
Because a Priest going to the home of a shut-in is out of the question…?The only method I see that could work for shut ins would be some sort of video conferencing such as face to face skpye because you are seeing the person via a webcam.
A Eucharistic Minister is the priest. An EMHC is not a Eucharistic Minister.Admittedly, and stated so…ok…wrong idea. However, never would “drive by communion” enter my mind… as did the idea re: confession via electronics…a Eucharistic Minister can bring an invalid communion, and for that matter, I can baptize as long as the formula is correct…for that matter an atheist can baptize…as long as the formula is accurate upon the request of a recipient, as might be the case of impending death…
far fetched?..well, I can tell you many many persons who have returned to the faith via EWTN…brought to you by television>>>>>![]()
CORRECTION…ABOVE WORK INvalid, should have stated “valid”…A Eucharistic Minister is the priest. An EMHC is not a Eucharistic Minister.
Well, a phone is allowed in the case of people who have trouble hearing (within a single physical confessional booth where both parties are physically present) to assist hearing…An interesting question is whether using email between a confessor and penitent would be valid if they are in each other’s presence.