Yes. This is how most modern Americans think, including me much of the time. Everything has to be really practical fast food at a bargain price.One would have thought that it was the content of any publication that was of primary importance not its appearance.
I agree with you. While I attend the Ordinaria I really wish we used the full missal. Learning to use the missal is a skill (albeit a simple one) that helps us to be active in the liturgical life of our Church. I think when you bother to learn the missal you’re more likely to keep up with readings on a daily basis and to know when feast days are and not to be “surprised” by days of obligation and such.Well, they’re tacky because they’re cheap and usually ugly. But I don’t subscribe to the current pet obsession of some that we shouldn’t be reading at Mass. Humans are actually (gasp) capable of multi-tasking and reading from a Missal while listening.
That’s an idea that has several problems with it.Just like for the NO, easy to follow without the backswitching ???
Produced monthly and then pitch the old ones !!
That’s an idea that has several problems with it.
The first is that there are just a whole lot fewer Tridentine mass goers out there, so there isn’t as much of a need for them. Many Tridentine mass goers have their own hand missals already, and many of the remainder prefer to hear the mass without a missal, some engaged in the rosary or other devotions during mass.
The Tridentine mass doesn’t have a three year cycle of readings, but instead the schedule is used each year. Makes it easier to keep in a single volume, if its the 10th Sunday after Pentecost 2007, you will have the same exact gospel and epistle as the 10th Sunday after Pentecost 2006, and will have in 2008.