S
Stepson
Guest
This was from another poster that helped relieved my anxiety about papal infallibility.Hey Stepson,
What’s convinced you that the current Catholic view of the primacy of the pope is ok? Just curious, because this would be the stumbling block for me, in light of the council of Nicea, and Orthodoxy’s rejection of universal jurisdiction and infallibility.
Jon
And thisAlthough I am a revert, this was a problem for me. It turns out I completely misunderstood the doctrine.
Here are somethings I came to learn:
The fact is that the Catholicism has the same problem of secular society trying to creep in. The difference is that there is no one in the Catholic Church has the authority to permit the changes secular society is seeking.
- The Pope does not have authority to override previous dogmatic teachings whether from Tradition, Ecumenical Council, or even Prior Infallible doctrines from previous Popes.
- Papal infallibility is rarely used. Not everything that comes from the Popes mouth is infallible. In fact, in Pope Benedict VI book, Jesus of Nazareth, he explicitly states the book is based on his own opinions and that it is not written under Papal Infallibility and Catholics are free to disagree.
- What made me come to love Papal infallibility was that it was the opposite of what I understood. In fact it turns out that the Pope is actually weaker than any Protestant Leader. Let’s look at the Anglican Church as an example. The Anglican Church ordains women as priests, permits ordained priests to marry, permits the use of contraception. People are always trying to get the Catholic Church to change its position on these issues but the simple truth is that the Pope has no authority to change these positions and neither do ecumenical councils.
I like the part where they poster explains that these beliefs cannot be changed even if secular society wants it to. Again this is comfort, and is not a jump in the river. I still have a lot of learning to do.By the way, I also want to add that the two of the most recent examples of the use of Papal Infallibility were actually more like informal long distance ecumenical councils. The Pope relied on the opinion of the Bishops.
- The Immaculate Conception: First, this is a doctrine we actually got from the East who were the first to establish a feast day for this doctrine. When the Pope wanted to define it as dogma he asked all of the Bishops to please give their opinion as to whether or not they agreed. The overwhelming majority of Bishops agreed with defining it as Dogma.
- The Assumption of Mary: The Bishops were actually the ones that requested this be defined as dogma. The Pope even went out of his way to define it in a way that did not contradict the Eastern version of the Tradition.
I don’t like the way secular society came in and changed the belief of the Lutheran Church ELCA. And now the Presbyterian Church. I understand that the Presbyterian vote took a number of years to pass but this group continued their attack until they got their agenda passed.
Where does this stop? I’m watching this type of secular attack coming in from all angles against our Christian life (Boy Scouts, school, church, attack on the pledge of allegiance.) I want to belong to a church that is a safe harbor from the secular attacks. I know, I know… sounds like I should join hands with my fantasy in a field of flowers and start singing “I’d like to teach the world to sing.”
