A
acseawell
Guest
This is very interesting. To what denomination do you refer, and which of the 7 books do you make pretty heavy use?Yes, we do. We also make pretty heavy use of them in our hymnody, as well.
This is very interesting. To what denomination do you refer, and which of the 7 books do you make pretty heavy use?Yes, we do. We also make pretty heavy use of them in our hymnody, as well.
“Now Thank We All Our God” comes from Ecclesiasticus, and “It Came Upon a Midnight Clear” in part from Wisdom, as I recall, as examples.This is very interesting. To what denomination do you refer, and which of the 7 books do you make pretty heavy use?
He removed them because they did not fit his teachingHe didn’t, He just placed them in a secondary position. I think it was more that his attitude toward them was strong enough that it justified, in most Protestant’s minds, removing them altogether. At least no one was upset enough to not buy Bibles from the printer who removed them.![]()
What is it about Judith that does not fit his teaching?He removed them because they did not fit his teaching
This doesn’t sound like the words one would say if a book didn’t “fit his teaching”.This is another book not to be found in the Hebrew Bible. Yet its words and speech adhere to the same style as the other books of sacred Scripture. This book would not have been unworthy of a place among them, because it is very necessary and helpful for an understanding of chapter 11 of the prophet Daniel. For the fulfilment of Daniel’s prophecy in that chapter, about the abomination and misfortune which was going to befall the people of Israel, is here described—namely, Antiochus Epiphanes—and in much the same way that Daniel [11:29–35] speaks of it: a little help and great persecution by the Gentiles and by false Jews, which is what took place at the time of the Maccabees. This is why the book is good for us Christians to read and to know.
IMHO, this is the equivalent of figuring out how much you want to deduct on your taxes THEN looking through the tax code to find support. I believe that Maccabees did not fit Luther’s teaching and maybe he resurrected (no pun intended) Jerome’s argument even though it was broader than his goal. He also did not like James and Revelation and I believe he put them in a separate section also (again, I read this somewhere, I did not know the man personally and with this kind of stuff people tend to embellish a little on the truth I have found). Now we know that since then fragments of some of these books have been discovered in Hebrew so the argument that they were written only in Greek is not valid.This doesn’t sound like the words one would say if a book didn’t “fit his teaching”.
But I am willing to listen to how it does because, frankly, I’m not satisfied with “its not in the Hebrew Bible” as a reason to hold them second to the universally attested books.
Jon